When someone who is problematic for the regime ends up convicted for an extreme act like terrorism or pedophilia, I get suspicious.
The Order was a legitimate right-wing terror group that robbed banks and murdered a radio-host, but then there's people like Randy Weaver and the Branch Davidians who may have been eccentric but were no terrorists, despite how the media portrayed them.
So you say, be careful of defending potential child abusers, but that's precisely why I have my doubts. I can say from my personal experience I knew a childhood friend who was accused of rape that I was convinced was guilty, but he ended up being innocent and once the whole story came out I was embarrassed for having jumped to conclusions.
What could have happened is the two of them had a relationship for a time, with him being unware of her age. When he was doxed at the Coeur d'Alene protest, she freaked out at having being dating an evil Nazi. She then went to the authorities, perhaps out of fear for associating with a notorious right-wing insurrectionist.
The feds then simply looked through his phone and found the sexual images he exchanged with the girl he thought was of age.
I also know of a case where a porn addict downloaded massive compilations of porn, unware that CP was included in it. His girlfriend discovered the CP and reported him to the authorities. However, it was later determined that he was sincerely not a pedophile, merely suffering from porn addiction that plagues so many men today, and had never intented to download CP.
And like I said the government or affiliated organizations have attempted to place CP on dissidents before, dissidents with a much greater capacity to defend themselves in court than some homeless twenty-something "neo-Nazi" disowned by his own family. It would not be difficult for the government to do so and who would take the time and the financial and reputational hit to try and prove the government's meddling in this particular case?
He's probably guilty, I'm not saying your next endeavor should be to bail him out of prison, but I personally am not 100% convinced of the story.
And then a few years later they return to Christianity.
Have a listen to The Godcast @Godcast@SuperLutheran . Many listeners who write in went the route from vague Christianity to Atheism/Agnosticism to Paganism to Christianity again.
It is God-centric, not jew-centric. It only seems jew focused if you don't understand the context. The jews were never special, and in fact, were always terrible.
The God of the Bible is the God of the universe. Not some localized forest spirit. Yahweh (actually just YHWH) means "I am that I am". Just another way of saying "God," and that's how it should be translated into English. The term "Yahweh" is a product of modern Judaizing and is not correct.
God isn't specific to the jews. The jews are regularly castigated and punished throughout the Bible for falsely believing they were special merely for being jews, which I talk about in those verses I linked to.
> I realize Rome and Greece are discussed, but usually in negative light from my recollection.
They are presented in a more positive light actually. Jesus asks God to forgive the Romans who crucified him, but not the jews who persecuted him, for instance. Pontius Pilate is portrayed sympathetically as well.
>weird because it seems like when i read the bible, jews and israel were mentioned way more than, oh, i dunno, Germany, Scandinavia, Gaul, Britain, Ireland, etc.
Paul's letters were exclusively addressed to Whites if I am not mistaken. Romans, Galatians, Thessalonians. All sorts of peoples are featured in the Bible: Assyrians (who exterminate the Israelites) Seleucids, Egyptians, Hittites I believe, etc.
It is like a Mexican father who loves his wife and works overtime to provide the best for his family. Versus your deadbeat cousin who is on drugs all the time and abandoned the mother of his child.
That Mexican is a better person than your cousin, but that Mexican also isn't family. It's great that Mexican is a great father, and you can respect him for it, but he's not your family. Your deadbeat cousin is.
So Christians can appreciate Christians of other races, but their responsibility is to their own family, their own ethnicity, and their own race.
>For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed
If you go back a few chapters to Romans 11:28, which refers to how Gentiles should view jews, there is further context:
>As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs
Jesus was a servant of the jews in that he fulfilled the promises of the Old Testament prophets, and he rewarded the VERY FEW jews who remained faithful. It is explicitly mentioned that the jewish people as a collective called for Christ's crucifixion, with only a handful of his disciples being opposed to it.
Matthew 22-25:
>Pilate asked them, “What should I do then with Jesus, who is called Christ?”
>They all answered, “Crucify him!”
>Then he said, “Why? What has he done wrong?”
>But they kept shouting all the more, “Crucify him!”
>When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that a riot was starting instead, he took some water, washed his hands in front of the crowd, and said, “I am innocent of this man’s blood. See to it yourselves!”
>All the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
The jews tricked the Galatians into believing that only by acting as jews, taking on all the ancient jewish traditions, could they be saved. Paul exposes this as a lie, that only faith in Jesus saves, and that the Galatians should return to their own traditions.
The verse is specifically anti-diversity and cautions against trusting jews.
@Snidely_Whiplash@Saber@udongle@Owl@Xeraser A rape fantasy for women isn't some hobo jumping her in an alleyway, it is a famous, handsome, wealthy man who she already finds very attractive becoming so overcome with desire that he can't help himself and must have her.
It's just a sexually aggressive highly desirable man, not a smelly pajeet that wants bobs.
The USSR was initially Team A controlled, particularly Trotsky and his cronies, while the USA was Team B. Gradually the Team A leaders in the USSR were killed, imprisoned, banished, or fled and Russia shifted over to Team B, while the "Russian" Team A players (usually kikes) relocated to America where they gradually shifted the USA to Team A.
It isn't like the 90's where catching sight of some side boob was a big deal. Sure there was still porn but good luck waiting an hour to download a single titty pic on dial up.
Now far more revealing pictures are just a google search away.
@Royper >"Your true values should be placed in something greater: Kindness and Morality"
also these people
"White people have no culture and are all inherently racist bigots and if you don't hate yourself for being White you should be discriminated against, injured, or killed."
and
"It doesn't matter if that black man injured, raped, or killed someone, because a bad thing happened to his people a long time ago he should be set free and allowed to continue injuring, raping, and murdering."
@boburtle@mona@WashedOutGundamPilot@spiral_power This is another problem with feminism. Women are attracted to men with status. Patriarchy fixed this by giving men higher social standing than women. This made even homely men at least tolerable to women. With feminism, men are placed below women, so it is even worse than it was in ooga booga caveman times.
Borzoi had a niece who came out as a lesbian. When his family talked to her about what being a lesbian actually was, she said "ew gross," and was no longer a "lesbian."
I wonder how many of these "gay kids" are confused on what being gay actually entails, or are saying they are gay for the social status and to stave off the stigma of being WHite.