It's scary just how uninformed and just passive people are. Was pointing out the flock cameras springing up everywhere to a coworker and what they were being used for and he was just uninterested.
I got shingles when I was 30. Thankfully I realized what it was right away and got that herepes antiviral shit cause my grandpa had it and knew what to look for. Still sucked but got to it early enough that I could mitigate the worst of the symptoms.
stress can possibly weaken your immune system leading to an outbreak but heres the thing, the chickenpox virus aka some herpes simplex, I forget which one, is with you for life. it lives in your nerves. the prevailing theory at the moment as to why people are having it break out earlier and earlier in life like I did, is that the chicken pox vaccine become widespread in the mid 90s, leading to less people actually having it. if you aren't exposed to it via the plague bearers known as children, your body gradually produces less and less antibodies for it which eventually leads to an outbreak of shingles.
I've taken those tests a few times over the years for various reasons. I'm about 50/50 INTJ/INTP. But as with all "personality tests", take it with a grain of salt.
Still, the point stands. If you admit that it wasn't directly on his person and even exempt some items due to lack of warrant and an illegal search and seizure, then how do you admit others within? It should be all or none. Fucking kangaroo courts.
Ok I guess my mind is playing tricks on me, I thought they had done an initial search of the bag at the scene where they did not find the gun in the bag.
Like either all of the contents are allowed or none of it. Her "finding" the gun after the initial inventory would mean that initial search was flawed. Wouldnt that open up the argument for a breach in the chain of custody?
poast is pretty fun, dunno what he's on about. (I know what he's getting at and he's right I just think it's funny he singled out poast for some reason.)