Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   :afire: palingenetic man :afire: (anonaccount@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 17:43:59 JST :afire: palingenetic man :afire:

   The judge rules the cops conducted an illegal search and seizure violating Luigi Mangione’s 4th amendment rights, since they didn’t have a search warrant.

   All items found in Luigi’s backpack at the Pennsylvania McDonald’s will not be allowed at trial.
   🔗

   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 17:43:57 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • WhitestTemplar
     Inventory exception is bullshit and is often used to end run the warranty requirement. For example, why would they need to photograph every page of the diary? Does the department do that with every book that find when taking an inventory, e.g. books in impounded cars?
   • Embed this notice
     WhitestTemplar (whitesttemplar@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 17:43:58 JST WhitestTemplar

     in reply to
     Assuming he didn't say anything all else that I know they have on him is a shit tier resolution video from a security camera.
   • Embed this notice
     brokenshakles (brokenshakles@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:48:12 JST brokenshakles

     in reply to
     DEI just bumped Luigi's chances of walking to 50%.
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:48:12 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to
     More. It opens a shitton of options right @Humpleupagus ?
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:49:39 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Nm. Just watched the vid clip. Still it's something.
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:49:39 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to
     Like either all of the contents are allowed or none of it. Her "finding" the gun after the initial inventory would mean that initial search was flawed. Wouldnt that open up the argument for a breach in the chain of custody?
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:51:05 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Ok I guess my mind is playing tricks on me, I thought they had done an initial search of the bag at the scene where they did not find the gun in the bag.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:51:05 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     They didn't. The found the magazine. The gun was discovered during inventory, allegedly.
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:51:06 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Like a gun isn't something small that could easily be mistaken or looked over.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:54:05 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Because looking in the bag at McDonalds was a search, and anything found was unlawfully found.
     
     The inventory at the station was an inventory. The purpose isn't to search for evidence, it's to record the contents for return, etc., like when you bail something. Plain view then kicks in.
     
     The inventory exception is very real and is often misused, but courts allow it. Be aware.
   • Embed this notice
     Heil_Honkler (heil_honkler@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 18:54:06 JST Heil_Honkler

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Still, the point stands. If you admit that it wasn't directly on his person and even exempt some items due to lack of warrant and an illegal search and seizure, then how do you admit others within? It should be all or none. Fucking kangaroo courts.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 19:20:30 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     The real rule is be careful about what you have in you when taken into custody. As long as they wait to "inventory", it's in.
   • Embed this notice
     captainslow (captainslow@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 19:51:34 JST captainslow

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     My maxim is “never break more than one law at a time”
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-May-2026 19:51:35 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Heil_Honkler
     • brokenshakles
     Also note this isn't just about backpacks, a dui will lead to an inventory of everything in the vehicle, which is another example of how broad the exception is.