/me sees folks justifying their use of BlueSky even though they hate it.
Y'know, to share a lesson I learned, the hard way.
Decades ago, I more or less exclusively used SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) aside from work email (I administered that MTA) and access on a handful of shells.
When my marriage fell apart, and my ex-wife took most of our friends with her, I began to go through the arduous process of recreating a social life & making new friends. Albeit, mostly thanks to deejayin this went well in person; & via hacker events I began to meet some more tech savvy sorts in person as well.
A lot of them, were not in the end-to-end encrypted comms software that was built from source level of being tech savvy. ;-/
They were maybe more like: use AIM (OSCAR), Y!M, MSN, LiveJournal, etc.
I maladapted to them. After all I was the more technically adept?
This was a categorical mistake.
The analogy would be: if people are drowning, throw them a life preserver.
Do not jump into the water with them!
By stooping to the lower levels of corporate owned closed source proprietary BS?
Sure, it was easier *for me*.
But it didn't help them from drowning.
It got worse.
Facebook emerged.
Twitter too.
If I had *done the work* and elevated those who could have benefited from my loftier technological ideals?
We would have had more SILC users.
More SILC clients.
More SILC daemons.
Instead?
Well, you can repeat this kind of mistake yourself.
BlueSky is RIGHT THERE!
It may be easier *for you*.
But will it be better?
I already learned that lesson, the hard way.;(