I am very anti getting covid *and also* this Lancet paper actually does a nice job of noting that the small cognitive deficits that persisted after clinically mild pre-vax-world covid may be too subtle to be noticed by the subjects, but there are other confounding factors & mysteries.
IRL many folks are *very* aware of cognitive problems after infection, so this isn't necessarily a case of special sneaky damage that's always subjectively invisible at high severity.
Mostly I want to say: There's a ton of evidence that covid damages cognition to some degree, even in clinically mild cases. But the specific relationship between subjective experience and objective measures is genuinely complex, so it's good not to over-reduce it.
(Metacognition is wickedly tricky, as anyone with a history of "brain fog" and/or loved ones with cognitive decline can attest. Some conditions are subjectively detectable and some not and severity CAN play a role but doesn't always.)
Lastly! (Sorry.) The portents of doom clearly aren't the only reason for Moz going so hard on AI—there's a long history of classic techno-libertarian philosophy within the org that makes a lot of it make sense—and Moz has been looking for ways to diversify for a loooong time, but I do think the intensity of focus has been bumped up by the sense that things could hit a very heavy wall quite soon.
In lieu of an extremely specific reply card: I will not myself be engaging in arguments about whether or not Mozilla's initiatives are "good AI" or whatever.
Also I promise that you do not have to explain to me how Moz is funded or how browser development and/or open source works. ✌️
I haven't said this bc it seemed obvious but since I was snarky yesterday: My assumption is that Mozilla is real into AI (and not into most other things) right now is bc the potential remedies in the Google monopoly suit are an extremely serious existential risk and they're trying to operate where the money is (AI, for now) and maybe do some good—by someone's lights—to prep for that potential doom.
I think one of the hard things about fedi, culturally, is that a whole lot (most??) of us are here because we are refusers of norms. And which norms and which levels of refusal differ.
So even if you’re at the 80th to 99th percentile of resistance to corporate social media OR mainstream party politics OR mainstream journalism OR cars OR the normalization of repeat covid infections, there will always be people popping up to tell you that by not being completely pure, you’re killing everyone.
As people come out of #xoxofest with, inevitably, some positive tests, I would like to reiterate as one of your Original Pandemic Aunties that *this is not your fault*.
Individuals in busted systems can only do so much for so long. Trying matters and/but so does giving yourself grace.
(Also there is a thread in the Slack for noting positive tests so folks can do light contact tracing, just fyi.)
So relieved and delighted to have this stuff out into the world where it can help new (and maybe also some experienced) fedi admins and mods think through their work. And maybe help convey to others at least some of what makes the fediverse such a structurally interesting place.
I'm even more optimistic about the fediverse than I was when we jumped into this—and sobered, too, by how much work there is to be done. But I think it's doable.
Longer post(s) to come after the morning school rush, but!
The Fediverse governance research @darius and I have been working on this year—with the absolutely central participation of so many wonderful Mastodon and Hometown server teams—is out:
A lot of people tried to warn that if we didn’t comprehensively reform the CDC and hold them accountable for covid failures (testing, data, guidance), the next pandemic was going to be a clusterfuck.
Instead of doing any of that, they moved the deck chairs into slightly different configurations and here we are, blindfolding ourselves and hoping it all works out great.
(This is held over from last week bc I was too angry then to post about it.)
I feel like the one of the lowest level human internet problems we haven’t solved is how to be around millions of people, many of whom vocally disapprove of at least some of our thoughts and actions, without letting our hyper-social status-sensitive primate brains either melt or devote themselves to arguing that all our positions are the right positions for everyone.
Like yes, some algos are bad, but we also just built structures we can’t quite handle and are perma-mad at each other about it.
Persistently shocked by how much of adult life is dealing with the consequences of other adults determinedly (and obviously!) playing pretend, with terrible consequences.
Working on governance, risk, and social patterns across federated systems. Previously: COVID Tracking Project + Knight Mozilla OpenNews + editorial and community in tech and culture orgs. I want our tools and networks to be better in more ways for more people in more places. Online 2-3 days a week. <3