@lain@SuperDicq@hfaust It's also not *necessary* without copyright & patent laws enclosing knowledge and rotting out culture.
(There should be no legal protections on trade secrets. The only protection should be having adequate opsec. No opsec, sucks to be you. Not society's problem.)
Copyleft or rather the GPL (or some explicit notification of the four laws) becomes a statement of intent and social expectation absent copyright.
Then one can further go on to liberate code that hasn't been properly released.
@yassie_j@TransTina The actually good war movies (intended to depict historical ones) don't glorify it, they are a macabre slideshow of horror where no one wins anything of value and the protagonists frequently die to no noticeable result.
@Hoss@briankrebs@pluralistic@vic Those at the top profiting just exit their scam in more-or-less orderly fashion if the scam is no longer viable shortly.
What do they care for the consequences on others? This isn't a new dynamic.
@sally You call it pollution, but I do not subscribe to biochauvinism nor bioconservatism.
That being said, I would indeed prefer for implanted devices to have sufficient microrobotic/nanotechnologic features for self-repair and maintenance. Ideally to a much greater and better extent than the flesh I am saddled with. Said organs or devices being fabricated in-situ is also acceptable, that would also permit in-place upgrades & dynamic reconfiguration (very desirable).
Flesh actively uses nanotechnology, it is essentially nanotechnology. Biological nanites from emergent systemic behavior. That kind of pedigree has downsides, however.
I'd also like implantables. Mostly for those things one doesn't want to have forcefully removed without force sufficient for maiming or dismemberment.
Besides being able to fuel something off blood sugar reactions would avoid needing to keep incendiary devices too close.
We do need proper brain-computer interfaces before that's a practical consideration though. Having something compromise ingress protection measures for interaction is no good.
@sally My brain is fundamentally incapable of very basic computation types even a plain 6502 could do. It is slow and unreliable. Deterministic evaluation can only be done symbolically, slowly and even then it is failure prone.
It is likewise unequipped for interfacing with information systems or external equipment in any meaningful way. Its extensibility is limited more than it needs to be. Our auditory apparatus, is capable of sufficiently varied IO that we should be capable of directly sharing various digital data at practical rates, among other options & apparatus.
My memories corrupt themselves trivially over time without any form of error correction. That is a disability that affects every human. My eyes will fail and decay as I age. They will do so long before I have no use for them.
I do not have control over large parts of myself where I should. I live in a blackboxed system that actively spites me.
One's flesh puppet is a tool, so are its various organs & components, and they are not the epitome of perfection. You already rely on those to exist. The only difference is that they are mostly beyond your ability to modify.
You also seem to believe your own flesh will not betray you and rot, despite the fact it demonstrably does so for millions every day. The dystopia you fear is already here. It has been for thousands of years.
This flesh puppet of mine refuses to reconfigure itself according to my will, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of the mechanisms required to enable such an act are present and actively used - beyond user control - for decades.
Incidentally, the self-modification problem is specific to humans and certain other kinds of life. There are animals capable of purposely modifying themselves, though that is limited in a number of ways I would still deem insufficient.
I already addressed the issue of forced removal of apparatus.
@lanodan Indeed, the last leg handover program doesn't need much smarts, it's purely there to isolate between the 3rd-party data parser & the rest of the system.
The player itself could be that program if the parsing part happens in a subprogram. I don't think threads can be isolated that way so subprogram it'd be.
In retrospect, yes I see what you mean, trying to shove invalid bytes in something that expects a sequence of arbitrary byte triples/quads can't really do much of anything. It'll just get displayed/played wrong/right. Validation doesn't make sense in this case.
Hi, I'm Lispi, Lisp (Technomancer) Wizard (to eventually be).You might know me from @lispi314@mastodon.top I like Free Software, #Emacs and resilient computing a lot.I also like anime girls, animes with cute girls doing cute things and artwork with them too. Cute stories are good too.Some Pins:Software and Assumed Privilege, common problems: https://mastodon.top/@lispi314/111253066257920146Writing Privacy-preserving software & services 101: https://mastodon.top/@lispi314/110849018589421824#Kopimism #FreeSoftware #CommonLisp