eu acabei de descobrir que a knorr teve a coragem de lançar lámen já faz tempinho, mesmo depois de eu fazer essa brincadeira por muitos anos. só (sabiamente) não usaram a marca que eu inventei. sem ressentimentos 🙂
ai ai aiquando cortarem as últimas árvores para dar lugar a datacenters em hiperescala, quando secarem os últimos rios e lagos para refrescar datacenters em hiperescala, quando o ar ficar irrespirável por causa de geradores que alimentam datacenters em hiperescala, restará alguma inteligência para entender que não podíamos respirar, beber ou comer lero-lero?
quando pássaros não puderem ser ouvidos por causa do barulho, quando abelhas já não houver, quando plantas não crescerem nem se multiplicarem por falta de água e polinização, quando animais, mesmo humanos, perecerem sem comida, água e oxigênio, o que restará para entender que não havia inteligência nessa tola empreitada?
when birds can't be heard because of the noise, when bees are gone, when plants won't grow and multiply for lack of water and pollination, when animals, even humans, perish without food, water and oxygen, what will be left to realize there was no intelligence in this foolish pursuit?
foi muito bom rever tantes outres companheires de longa data nessa caminhada de luta pela liberdade de software. uma reunião dessas pra falar de software livre como política, como movimento social, não (só) como tecnologia, dá um gás na gente. foi um encontro pequenininho, não pude estender minha permanência em sampa pro pós-evento, mas teve um gostinho de FISL.
taken to the extreme, sharing a universe with a nazi makes it a nazi universe, and everyone in it nazi, which is bonkers. since moving to another universe is not an option, the available rectification possibilities involve termination, either of oneself, of the nazi, or both. ISTM that setting out to terminate others is a feature that strongly identifies nazis, so it follows that if one sets out to terminate nazis, one must end by self-termination. for some reason I can't quite find that prospect very appealing, so I sort of decide to live on sharing a universe with nazis despite preferring them not to be around. and if someone labels me a nazi for that sort of, erhm, tolerance?, well, what else could I do? point out that they, too, share this universe, with the nazi, with myself, and with everyone else? and so, if they set out to terminate everyone in this (nazi bar) universe, and succeed, there won't be anyone left at all
now, I was thinking of elections, just-past and future. if a nazi gets to congress, does that make everyone else in congress who doesn't resign (= leave the table) right away also a nazi? taking the nazi bar analogy further, it would presumably be analogous to a non-nazi supermajority in congress's kicking out the one abomination, but could they actually do so, legally and democratically? 'cause if they can't democratically kick the one nazi out, and they're all supposed to resign (leave the table and the bar) to show they're not nazi, then what follows is a 100% nazi congress (bar), which I don't find appealing at all.
Her friend is happy for her but also worried that maybe she's spending a little too much money.
This leads to an argument about how there was always jealously since they were little kids.
They have a big falling out.
Alone, our protagonist buys the adblocking plan an everything in her life changes. It's so much better and she's a little disturbed to find out just how many things in her life were just ads.
She decided to buy the plan for her best friend too as a gift. To make up.
generate an email so it can be summarized by the recipients LLM being #ActuallyAutistic, I wonder... would people be insulted receiving email with the bulleted points that LLM users would typically feed a (de)generator? should it advise the recipient to feed them to an LLM if they'd prefer a textual version that could then be summarized back to bulleted points?
I don't think I could actually write my emails like that, but ISTM it would be a fun experiment to run
I'm not sure what you're getting at. my point was about copyright in general, so it applies to copyleft as well, inasmuchas copyleft is built on copyright
FTR, I didn't mean to join the entire discussion, just to address a minor point about copyright within your earlier post. I don't really know what the proof standards and requirements look like, I just know that independent works, no matter how similar, aren't supposed to infringe each other's copyrights. this fact has nothing to do with LLMs. using LLMs may bring about doubts about authorship, provenance, and independence, but those don't favor claims of infringement between works made supposedly-independently with LLMs. which is not to say that they can't both be found to infringe on other preexisting works used for training the model; there's plenty of uncertainty there.