Notices by Light (light@noc.social)

@panoptykon
This person is a shitposter. Pay him no mind.
@Suiseiseki @rysiek

@evan Mmm. You should confirm they violate your federation policy in some way.

@evan Unless it's just a personal block. In which case it's entirely up to you.

@quasi
Also, Emmeline Pankhurst? I looked her up and she was a suffragette. Why would they be peeing on her statue?

@mischievoustomato @r000t @SuperDicq lmao

@Suiseiseki
Why?
@SuperDicq @light

@silverpill
"Social web" rolls off the tongue just fine
@liaizon

@djsumdog
>Yea same here. I can't stand listening to the guy talk.
I knew I wasn't interested from the moment I heard he was all about "hustling" and getting rich and living that kind of lifestyle.

@djsumdog Especially if she can't recognise a brothel when she sees one.

@djsumdog I'm not sure what the connection is between prostitution and coming into debt. And if I (27M) am ignorant of that, probably so could she.

@djsumdog
>If you lie to an adult and mislead them in order to extra money from them, that's a scam and it's illegal. If you tell a girl you love her, then ask her to star in some porn ... like, the girl can say no. Or cant' she? Why can't she?
Isn't this the same thing?

>lie to an adult
>tell a girl you love her [when you actually don't]

>and mislead them in order to extract money from them
>then ask her to star in some porn [presumably while making money off it]

If I'm missing something it's probably because I haven't actually watched any of Tate's courses and am relying on secondhand sources.

@djsumdog

cc: @taylan

@taylan
Ah. This is why:
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/andrew-tate-podcast-spotify_uk_67d2e964e4b0180744f7a80c

@taylan
On second thoughts, I looked on Spotify and can't find it.
Is it real?

This is fucked up: https://www.change.org/p/demand-spotify-remove-andrew-tate-s-harmful-courses-on-how-to-traffic-women

@lain I thought you didn't care what the cunts on Twitter were doing

@ntnsndr For example, Aether (a Reddit-like) had democratic and individualistic moderation (collectively vote on default moderation for newcomers but your vote is your moderator regardless): https://getaether.net/
And Cabal Chat has what they call "subjective moderation" (choose your own moderators): https://cabal.chat/

@ntnsndr To my mind, that means P2P networks and darknets.
Only then can we have truly free speech.
But they needn't be ungoverned.
They can be designed with new forms of governance, unconstrained by the implicit feudalism of the old.

@sun IIRC a lot of left-leaning people were against the Guantanamo bay stuff though, so calling them full of shit isn't quite fair.
That's the problem with any kind of group-based thinking. It's always based on generalisations.