Maybe you never question the real urgent need for tech. I won't shut up about it! I bring it up every time! Completely ruthless!
I just want to know how to be actually effective in reducing tech. Even people who agree with me are like "Welp" (shrugs helplessly) (kicks you out of your appointment if you won't take the iPad)
Are you going to push other people around, and force them at gunpoint not to do a capitalism, in your glorious anarchy? There can be no pure anarchy, because that's not what we want. We want people to be awful and capitalist, and fascist, and bullying, and abusing, murdering, robbing, and completely powerless, because somehow there would be mechanisms in place to keep them from taking power or fooling everyone else.
What those mechanisms are I don't know, but I know any solution is going to have to be ugly and haphazard and unpredictable, or the tyrants will stomp it out. The revolution will not be televised.
I certainly agree that if those mechanisms only work in one state and not all of them, then the tyrants will cower within their tyrannies, tirelessly warring against everyone trying to do an anarchy.
My only question is how to keep the other states from coming in and saving you from lawlessness with brutal military interventions? It's entirely true that without a state, interpersonal harms could be greatly reduced. But the one function a state does serve is keeping away other states. Which defeats the purpose, since as peasants will observe it doesn't matter who's the king. But is there a way to keep away other states, without throwing the baby out with the bathwater?
You can be a perfectly decent person and still process the punchcards that help the trains take your victims to the camps. "The deepstate" is a bad thing because it's not publically accountable, and the complexity allows for atrocities to be covered up, and prevents people from stopping them. Even if everyone in it is a saint with no desire to murder or enslave anyone, the only justifiable action they can take is dismantling it, and going home to their family and friends.
1. A floating golden ring in the air with a second white ring below it, orthogonal to the first. There several faces on the second ring, all with green eyes and an occasional bit of hair divided into two curly locks: pink and lavender. One of the faces is stating "Be not afraid!" Beneath the second ring, a small orange pony with one small wing, purple eyes and reddish purple hair is standing on a green landscape with two small hills. The pony is sweating nervously, wearing white socks, and a white harness on her body which holds a third ring above her head. The letters "@HeshieokF" are inscribed in the lower right.
2. Scootaloo has much to worry about Biblically Accurate Sweetie Belle besides that her costume is better, by HeshiokF on Twitter
Well I like 2. If a blind person isn't familiar with the characters, or the Biblically Accurate meme, they will get exactly the same out of this picture as a sighted person in the same situation. The vast majority of individuals, sighted or blind, can correctly roll their eyes and move on from my obvious nonsense. Describing it more to someone who doesn't get the joke is a waste of their time.
Just want to point out the Nazi Bar allegory is bunk. Fascists operate by courting wealth, then buying the bar and turning it into a Nazi bar; they are the bartender, and they fool you into thinking they're just "tolerating" the Nazis who come in and bully people out.
Invaders don't arrive as a guest. They come in force. Hostile takeovers of communities by refugees fleeing disaster has n e v e r happened. If there's no army, there's no invasion. Invasion won't work without some military operations.
So yeah you can get kicked out of a pub for being disruptive. If your community's so weak it can't welcome outsiders though, that's not a problem with the outsiders.
Hey now, you're not thinking only about innocent young girls and 40 year old men! Clearly you didn't pay attention because your critical thinking faculties haven't been replaced by useful rage and fear. How about instead of listening to reason, you think more about the evil image of gross old (old people are gross(we should exterminate theM)) 40 year old men and dear sweet little girls quaking in fear at the evil hulking oldmonsters? Are you angry yet? Did we mention 40 year old men?
Well they are magically saner and less evil, provided you don't allow philanthropists to withhold donations from nonprofits who don't fit in with their agenda. 😞
But no the only definition I've heard for "block" is an unstructured sequence of data, generally of a fixed maximum size. It's a metaphor for how you divide a city up into blocks, so to deal with big data, you divide that up into blocks too.
I suppose Minecraft might define a block as an actual virtual cube voxel. Minetest calls them nodes, though.
Technically linked lists can be between different data structures, other than "blocks." Blockchains are chains of blocks, not chains of skiplists or whatever you're doing with linked lists. And I'm not basing it off of anything. Regardless of what you think is proper for calling something a blockchain, and whether I should be allowed to refer to non-consensussy blockchains as blockchains, there are intractable problems with blockchains as I define them, even if they lack that Byzantine consensus nonsense.
I just use the Fediverse, nothing else seems worth bothering with. I kind of gave up a while ago. I don't have an existing group, or anyone at all really. Met some nice people on the Fediverse though. (None of them are interested in whatever network I might propose.)
I find it has pretty intractable scaling problems. So like... it works... at first. But gets bigger and slower pretty much exponentially. What was that non-blockchain network... Briar I think?