except the Asians - if they wipe out the dot heads we can make them honoraries, if they don't they can go back to places whose names I can't pronounce and into the skull pyramids
you want to preserve gene complexes which are combinatorial mixes of synergistic good genes - you also want novel new good genes (which increase with gene variance) - you also want to kill bad genes and dysgenic gene complexes (keep dumbs and uglies from reproducing)
"mixed" folks (like basically all American Whites are way more mixed than Europeans and all have at least some kike and red genes) will be more distributed amongst stupid and smart, healthy and ill, etc.
until we can actually do gene editing at the germ level, a program of eugenics where small amounts of outlier miscegenation should be okay - as long as we can accept for every one Keanu we get several Eliots
yes, but that is my point - excluding niggers and pajeets and abbos and spics, that should be the standard
but also, I also want to point out that it sucks to have to wonder and worry if you have a feather head or kike or nigger ancestor a few hundred years ago
Basically all heritage White Americans are some chunk Native Americans and any whose ancestors are from say Germany or further East have some 1%+ kike ancestry, those from the south (say Spain or Italy) have some percent nigger or arab genes.
In Europe, there is no concept of "White" (they don't even share a language), while in America there is very little concept of X or Y Nation of origin in most places. Most White Americans are mutts of 3+ European nations with various admixtures of minorities tossed in.
I honestly don't know what is "ideal" and struggle with the fact I am a mix of European peoples and probably have some genes of people I hate - and I curse the fact some of my ancestors didn't think I deserves to be of a people. If I knew which ones they were, I would spit upon them and break their graves.
But this is the lot of the White American - no real past, and an uncertain future. And I can accept some folks fucking that sideways pussy over any of those nappy headed niggers or fucking kikes - though I wish my ancestors were not so foreign to me.
@calicocrack@stoner713@BadFediPosts it is quite plausible he was dying for the entire course of the war and kept going by the insane cocktail of drugs, he was at a minimum fighting a host of ailments
drugs are tools and should not be treated like toys, they should not be glorified as a release from the Weimar we suffer under but only used to overcome it
@DrFell@Humpleupagus@thendrix both basic advice items are good: 1. normies are dumb, your message must be dumber to speak to them 2. don't talk too much because people don't like it, keep it short
and here are some others: 3. if it rhymes it sounds true 4. repeat to make it remembered 5. make emotions, not arguments
@TheMadPirate@Humpleupagus I know this is hard to hear, but most "science" is unscientific and the results and conclusions are wrong, often deliberately so
being humble about how little we know and how little of what we've been taught is true is part of trying to fix this sea of fictions we are in
@TheMadPirate@Humpleupagus@Frondeur Science as an approach is not a marketplace, it is a series of techniques designed to produce and test hypothesis and formulate theories predicated upon those that fail to be disproved which can be tested for their predictive power and wider applicability
Science as an industry varies from trying to use science as an approach to produce goods and products (applied sciences) to the large body of non-use oriented science that is meant merely for publish
and in this science for publish industry, the science is anything but free or a marketplace - it serves primarily as a regime mechanism for smuggling political ideas into journals and studies to give them a veneer of plausibility to normies - those ideas are then be used by companies and governments to enact deeply unpopular and clearly false notions with a "a study says" argument
the published science industry has nothing to do with science as an approach, is rife with fraud and p hacking and fake data, and has very little replicability - if that is what you are studying, you are training to enter into a fraud industrial complex
> tldr - while science can refer to a tool and method, most science is a system to promote fictitious ideas for political and economic deceit,
> neither of those are a marketplace in which people trade goods or server
@snappler@TheMadPirate@Humpleupagus@Frondeur I think there should be a bifurcation of the sciences into right wing science and everything else - where the right creates its own academy, journals, grants, etc. and not only funds new research but begins retesting the journal science industrial complex and does an audit on their replicability
this could be funded, along with right wing applied science, by right wing companies and patrons
and then you would have an actual marketplace to choose from with the bias clear