Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   white_male (white_male@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 05:04:50 JST white_male

   • Griffith
   @Griffith The memo never happened.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 05:04:49 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Griffith
     > Action
     > Reaction
     > Resolution
     
     Simple as.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 05:12:35 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Griffith
     We really need to do something about the judiciary. Maybe limit the jurisdiction of the district courts, and create a new jurisdiction for preliminary injunction regarding executive action. That litigants can forum shop to find that one judge who will say "no" is nearly a blanket restriction on all executive action if the plaintiff's bar so elects. There's always that judge.
   • Embed this notice
     white_male (white_male@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 05:12:36 JST white_male

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Griffith
     @Humpleupagus @Griffith Yep, just when you thought Trump has tied hands and can't do shit anymore. I wonder how many more moves he can pull, while fighting judiciary over everything.
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 05:24:55 JST brigrammer

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Griffith

     @Humpleupagus @white_male @Griffith make some "Preventing Partisan Judicial Abuse" executive order to randomize the judge selection and restrict which venues are available

     and start private investigations into the courts so these judges can be referred to DOJ, because I am sure a lot of the leftist judges run afoul of some law or another

     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.