@evan
Yes, what happened to C2S anyways?
@erincandescent @Seirdy @starshine
Notices by jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Wednesday, 17-Apr-2024 11:03:52 JST jon ⚝ -
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 00:37:50 JST jon ⚝ @ntnsndr @GuerillaOntologist @skyfaller @shauna @Matt_Noyes Thanks for mirroring the arguments. As I might feel tempted to answer to the second example later, I'm inclined to offer a slight variation of the prior:
Nobody accused anyone of lying above, if I'm not mistaken, which might leave us with the following, instead:
"The techno-social architecture of distributed ledgers is not sufficient to redistribute wealth equally to all, why we must choose to abandon this and persue other prospects."
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 00:02:05 JST jon ⚝ @GuerillaOntologist @ntnsndr @skyfaller @shauna @Matt_Noyes Josh, can we name three specific critiques that are missing a response in this thread?
I'm with you about scrutiny in empirical argumentation of the subject.
From the above discussion, I'd pick:
1. Distributed ledgers are not decentralised in terms of protocol design and P2P bootstrap.
2. Philosophical arguments about novel governance and renumeration schemes ignore the fundamental critique of immutable, ungovernable protocol design. -
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 00:02:04 JST jon ⚝ @GuerillaOntologist @ntnsndr @skyfaller @shauna @Matt_Noyes
3. The identification and naming of quantification as institutional governance model, which is used to enscribe and reproduce monetary power hierarchies within a private property narrative that encloses common resources, limits the discourse within groups and the public plus assumes and presents social stratigraphy as an ontological fact.
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jan-2024 04:14:27 JST jon ⚝ @ryanc
This stands out for me:"discrimination is justified by the difficulty of updates to the legal system and the cost of updating IT systems"
It means legal and informational systems are bound by material constraints, such as availability of labour, coordination costs, modular and standardised architectures, plus regulatory procedures.
Which all in all makes a strong argument for using FLOSS collaboration patterns to decrease auxiliary costs for all participants in the distributed system.
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Jan-2024 13:13:26 JST jon ⚝ @smallcircles Maybe just put the list in Wikidata? Seems easier to maintain collectively in the long run.
You can always create any kind of representation from that raw data.
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 02:33:35 JST jon ⚝ @evan Many fedi! (:
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Nov-2023 07:15:12 JST jon ⚝ @youronlyone Okay, thanks for your details. I will see how this can integrate with the Docker setup. @alan
-
Embed this notice
jon ⚝ (yala@degrowth.social)'s status on Thursday, 09-Nov-2023 11:43:35 JST jon ⚝ Are there good instructions on how to do so?