Notices by Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)

@targrus 💜

@stephenrkell @monkey1 you might like our whitepaper https://files.spritely.institute/papers/spritely-core.html

@cwebber well, people were able to track down an actual work address a few days ago from one of the profiles, and people suspected they don’t know (but I haven’t seen any updates on that front)

But if you want me to answer the question of "Can atproto scale down?" my answer is still: no. :)

ATProto still cannot scale down and scale wide, not towards meaningful decentralization.

Thanks for listening!

These efforts are still good. It's good to see them!

But every now and then someone points me to them and says "see! all those decentralization concerns are over." I still don't think they will be without an architecture change to message addressing.

And none of this even remotely challenges my primary original argument: if there is no central source of authority and things are really decentralized, the network scales towards decentralization *quadratically*.

What's being looked at is lightweight relays that are effectively relay *mirrors*.

But what's making them avoid the world-sized growing database is that they're dropping data older than 72 hours.

Given that Bluesky's major argument is "no missed replies!" this isn't a fundamental solution to the shared heap challenge.

But the other suggestion for saving things is, maybe there will be a different relay approach?

Well there's been some work on that too, so let's examine of that changes the game https://bsky.app/profile/bnewbold.net/post/3lkpdjgj5pk2i

One of the big hopes pinned at the end points at Free Our Feeds, and the hope that there will be a *second* big player hosting relays, and this will approach decentralization.

See my original blogposts critiquing having just a few instances by big players be "decentralization".

Point three:

> That's a silly thought experiment, because operating and orchestrating all the little services is not within reach for many people even if it is cheap. It will probably be a tiny number. So then is this a meaningful contribution to decentralization?

(I don't think it's silly)

Point two:

> If we approach content hydration heavy fetching against PDSs, it could overload them. If you self-host a viral skeet will you get a surprise bandwidth bill?

But I think the key paragraphs are towards the end:

> I'd like to think of this as a bottom-up approach to scaling down. Can it get us to decentralization? If we scale to millions of copies of micro-AppViews, it will burden the relays.

This highlights point one

I like this post! I want to make it clear. And it's also very positive about my writing. I'm glad the author of the post is experimenting with things and I'm happy to see people try to host more of ATProto's tech pieces. That's great!

But! It's still a stripped down AppView. Very stripped down.

The first post which came up which a bunch of people asked me to comment on is "Can atproto scale down?" https://bsky.bad-example.com/can-atproto-scale-down/

It's a positive effort, the author is working on testing self-hosting, but the conclusion given at the start is too strong and leaves out the middle

However, every now and then someone posts an advancement with someone experimenting with self-hosting ATProto infrastructure. I think those experiments are good, but they still don't change my fundamental analysis, and the recent changes if anything reify that my fundamental analysis is true: Bluesky/ATProto/the shared heap pattern still scales quadratically, and is expensive to run.

Context on my previous blogposts:

How decentralized is Bluesky really? https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/
Re: Re: Bluesky and Decentralization https://dustycloud.org/blog/re-re-bluesky-decentralization/

So, can ATProto scale down? Have Bluesky's "scaling towards decentralization" issues been fixed?

Not fundamentally. There have been advancements in self-hosting efforts, and they're good, but my fundamental analysis of Bluesky and ATProto scaling quadratically have not changed, despite recent efforts being good. 🧵

@yakobjorgensen wow ok actually this looks like exactly like what I want

but really I wonder if the picture of the Nicole Fediverse Chick is someone's actual photo, and if said person knows about the Nicole the Fediverse Chick scam

@jdp23 @_elena @laurenshof note for someone skimming this: messages are not held longer than 72 hours in this setup