Notices by n0toose (n0toose@chaos.social)

@GossiTheDog @wrog the research of someone on mastodon is on the front page of the guardian as we speak, too

Is there a word or means of expression for when someone complains about someone/something specific on social media (e.g. soon after a controversy), and someone else uses that complaint to air their preexisting grievances towards the subject that are only tangentially relevant with the discussion involving the subject at hand?

#askfedi

@apps @GroupNebula563 Yeah, but you're phrasing your impression of the discussions on Mastodon (?) as if it's reflecting of Codeberg's actual policies, which, with all due respect, they don't.

On the contrary, the blog post states informal guidelines that very much exclude cases like yours: https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.html

If you think that's a "bad omen" anyway, fully respect that and the honesty to your community, but I don't think it's an honest narrative of the infra providers' intentions.

@GroupNebula563 @apps For the record, fully respect the decision to self-host instead of using someone else's computer (and the transparency), but I must note that the amount Tom is describing wouldn't have been a problem to begin with.

Otherwise, e.g. the Linux kernel would be banned as well.

It's amazing how far you can get in life simply by removing disabled="" in the HTML using Inspect Element.

#Codeberg has a rather small team backing it. As registrations on Codeberg have gone way up as of the past week, we could always use help from (both from non-technical and technical volunteers). To see what we have to offer, take a look here: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Contributing/wiki

There isn't necessarily a time commitment involved (if at all). Say, if 20 people spent 5-15 minutes to, say, send a pull request to something that annoyed them in our documentation, it would be in a much better state.

@carmenbianca Feel free to bump this issue and mention that it's still a problem if you feel like it. (I wouldn't mind doing it on your behalf either, but need to ask first, I believe. 😅)

@carmenbianca @fsfe We love using REUSE (although Forgejo doesn't support it quite yet) and this makes me (and at least one other person who let me know, so I guess that counts as "us") super excited! :D

Happy that you're on board, don't hesitate to reach out if you need anything or have any questions.

@whitequark @dpk bonus points that this DoS attack did not bring down codeberg with it either 😅

#Forgejo federation can't come fast enough for you? Have you ever wished to help out, but specifications are too scary and you don't know where to start?

In that case, I have the perfect task for you (yes, you!): https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9282

#ForgeFed #federation #Codeberg

@simon @whitequark it's all very chaotic at the moment but i find it all super productive – i work with an awesome team where we're all pretty much agreeing on the problems, thankfully. :)

@whitequark @simon idk people doing codeberg leadership stuff, I'm a member of the presidium. there was a clear expectation that pages is a thing, and the entire situation has been a bit volatile judging by the e. V.-internal thread 😅

@whitequark @simon anyway, personal opinion and all

@whitequark @simon my bad, but lol that's a cool project, i was lowkey pretty stressed that we'd have to find ourselves in a position where we'd be expected to dethrone the other people working on yet another codeberg pages solution 😅

@whitequark @simon not without replacement - the discussion evolved since.

anyway, alternative solutions are good and contribute to a healthier ecosystem, 10/10

"I went to the #postmarketOS people but they wouldn't flash my phone"

#FrOSCon25

The #Codeberg hashtag has many asking about private repositories. Our notifications have _completely_ exploded, and our exposure to feedback from "outside our bubble" have lead to us receiving several signs that we can improve our messaging on, such as this FAQ entry: https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#how-about-private-repositories%3F

We're working on clarifying our stance. Here's a work-in-progress pull request that we are working on in real time to clarify what our stance is: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/660

[Update: Merged, + a makeover]

Person: "I'm weird"
@garfieldairlines: "No shit, look at me, I am in a a cat costume!"

#OH #GPN23

@ryanc I didn't take "this project broke GitHub" as literally as I should've before checking it out.

So, I checked the references of the Wikipedia article "link rot", and I decided to click on the first URL to a paper that I saw in the references.

Needless to say, the link did not lead me to a paper: