Notices by Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st), page 6
-
Embed this notice
@TrevorGoodchild @SonofNumenor @TornadoOfTerror If they’re merely temporarily embarrassed academics as you say then they just don’t really have much worthwhile opinions on anything tbh
-
Embed this notice
@latein @Crux_Invictus @ArdainianRight @hachi @djsumdog @meowski @BowsacNoodle @SuperLutheran @mrsaturday >free will does not separate his role from creating man and permitting him to sin
God is blameless in this
God creates man and mortal things because God has fallen in love with His own creation and wishes for creation to be more like Himself and thus contain every possible manifestation of the Good
By virtue of your existence, you already depend on Him. Anything that exists thus depends on Him. He can thus be described as omnipotent. Being omnipotent is not the same as being a tyrant, however. If the true nature of what a thing is is good (and it is), then how could He ever suffer to destroy such a thing by His own hand?
-
Embed this notice
@epictittus @patris @judgedread Change of groups of people/animals and/or advancement towards some goal/purpose is fine. Some conception of heredity is also fine
What I don’t accept however is the popular conception of evolution where the creature is basically passively reacting to environmental changes, with all changes being effectively random and it is just sheer coincidence that complex lifeforms were created this way
-
Embed this notice
@TrevorGoodchild @meowski The one point he might have is that Trump is actually hated, which is true at least today
And I’m pretty sure he had jewish backing during his campaign, but somewhere along the way he went out of line (whether intentionally or not remains to be seen) and so he has to be punished
-
Embed this notice
@TrevorGoodchild @sickburnbro ZOG is powerful but not some sort of invincible demigod with total power
People like to bring up America giving away its manufacturing capability to China as some sort of “proof” that China is controlled opposition for ZOG, but this ignores the mindset of the neoliberal who actually smells his own farts as well as the whole Cold War thing
-
Embed this notice
@TrevorGoodchild @PraxisOfEvil @Neofugue1 @LawrenceGerald @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom If people really are interested in becoming reactionaries, they don’t need to bother with any of these people, waste of time
Just read authors like Evola and even the Church Fathers like Augustine
-
Embed this notice
@TrevorGoodchild @Neofugue1 @LawrenceGerald @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom >fisted by foucault
Why that name?
-
Embed this notice
@Neofugue1 @LawrenceGerald @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom >trying to exclude anyone who isn’t the American intelligentsia
Ok, so automatically a faggot and quite easy to tell what he *really* believes (hint: not reactionary)
-
Embed this notice
@Neofugue1 @LawrenceGerald @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom He either displays complete ignorance of how the leftist mind actually works or simply wants to get close to the neoliberal power structure. The former is inexcusable for a person like him.
The leftist academic is not motivated by petty things us plebs value like “logic” and “clear thinking”. The leftist is irrational and usually has other motivations for his beliefs. Usually, power is one of the few things a leftist understands. To try to get them to “question Progressivism” is a fool’s errand. Their motivation for believing that shit is entirely irrational. They may make all sorts of pretensions about how rational and enlightened they are but all of that is bullshit lies and deception.
Just try logically refuting some of their inviolable tenets like materialism and you’ll see actual seething hatred from said academics. These people are not the kind that you can win over by rational argumentation. Dialectic is pointless if the desire for truth is not mutual. All you have without this mutual desire is force and violence.
-
Embed this notice
@Neofugue1 @LawrenceGerald @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom probably a controversial opinion but based on my own observation, the majority of the so-called "NRx" or "neo-reactionary" crowd aren't really reactionaries, they're just a different flavour of liberal, especially Mencius Goldbug
-
Embed this notice
@LawrenceGerald @Neofugue1 @Starprophet1 @HonkHonkBoom NRx just appears "reactionary" because it adopts outward reactionary forms, a lot of the substance seems to me to just be lolbert nonsense (which is yet again just a different flavour of liberal)
-
Embed this notice
@toxoplasmosis @Appalachian_Crusader @DailyStormerDigest So describe to me your solution to the problem of modernity and why your solution is superior
-
Embed this notice
@toxoplasmosis @Appalachian_Crusader @DailyStormerDigest 1) What that means is to be in control of yourself and not to be an emotional faggot who finds enemies because they offended you personally. The latter is the mark of a woman.
2) The Church Fathers don’t say that everyone is the same. Especially Augustine. The point is that people are distinct but are nevertheless one faith.
3) You have still not outlined your solution. I get the impression that it’s going to be some sort of quasi-Nietzschean individualism though.
-
Embed this notice
@toxoplasmosis @Appalachian_Crusader @DailyStormerDigest 1) Jesus is basically God, so to be like Jesus is to be like God. This is deification and there is literally nothing wrong with it. If you see a good person acting a certain way, logically you want to be like that person.
2) If what you said is true, the Church Fathers would’ve thought like this. The majority of Christians didn’t. Maybe be less of a prideful faggot and realise that you have the wrong idea.
3) So you don’t have a solution. Got it. You just destroy and destroy until there is nothing left. Just like the average leftist does. So weird (lolno)!
-
Embed this notice
@toxoplasmosis @Appalachian_Crusader @DailyStormerDigest 1) He fulfilled his purpose and his life is complete. He accepted his death and didn’t run away from it. That deserves respect. Learn what classical virtue is instead of being an animal.
2) Ah yes, the “let me tell you about your religion” mentality. You American by any chance?
3) “Christian democracy” is when I know you are a clueless clown who spouts nonsense.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread @Cough >shitting on stonetoss
yeah if anyone still doubts that these guys are complete fags, they are either blind, have some sort of vested interest or part of their fag cult
Statistics
- User ID
- 249346
- Member since
- 15 Mar 2024
- Notices
- 116
- Daily average
- 0
Plotinus Enjoyer
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the