"This shift in policy is a direct response to the shortcomings of the previous approach, which failed to effectively deter users from engaging in problematic activities."
and
"balance between protecting free speech and ensuring the safety of our community, we must continually assess and refine our approach to content moderation. "
Yeah, he's trying to crash the ship with no survivors.
Alf, on Jim's Blog started using the same faggy language. Before he started jannying @Neofugue1 off for saying Orthodox theology, and jannying me off for questioning Bitcoin sales pitches.
@LawrenceGerald@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom I got jannied of Jim's Blog for questioning the secular basis of Natural Law (hint: without God, there isn't one). Eventually my comments got censored, and since then I haven't posted. I am neither the fastest writer nor the fastest editor, so it's not worth it for me to write long academic posts if they get deleted.
In any case, if I'm going to listen to someone prattle about the God of Evolution on and on, I'd rather listen to Judge Dread, who at least gets his predictions right. Also says "nigger" more.
Moldbug was correct that Progressivism predates Jewish power, and that the modern American iteration of “equality” comes from Harvard, which was created from the Puritans who killed Charles I. Moldbug spoke highly of Carlyle and Pobedonostsev, so I think it is extremely unfair to say that he was not a Reactionary. He also was not shy from making rather interesting remarks about niggers, so...
Of course, I say “Moldbug was,” not “Moldbug is,” because Curtis Yarvin is a namefag, and namefags always lie.
Also, regarding his manner of speaking, Moldbug is not talking to people like you, he is talking to people like me, in other words, the upper-middle-class and above [East Coast] American intelligentsia. He writes in academic language because he is trying to exclude everyone who is not one of the American intelligentsia.
America is run by Jews, but its religion, Western Liberal Democracy, is not Jewish.
@LawrenceGerald@Neofugue1@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom NRx just appears "reactionary" because it adopts outward reactionary forms, a lot of the substance seems to me to just be lolbert nonsense (which is yet again just a different flavour of liberal)
@Neofugue1@LawrenceGerald@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom probably a controversial opinion but based on my own observation, the majority of the so-called "NRx" or "neo-reactionary" crowd aren't really reactionaries, they're just a different flavour of liberal, especially Mencius Goldbug
@plotinus_enjoyer@LawrenceGerald@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom You are not his audience. Moldbug does not give a damn about what you think. He does give a damn about what the American educated elite think, and his blog was meant to get them to question Progressivism. Why do you think he extensively cites his sources? So that you could check them?
You are smart, well-read and well-spoken, certainly a learned man, but you are not of the people who need to lose their faith in order for political change to be possible. Communism fell in the Soviet Union not because the government was overthrown by outsiders, rather it fell because the insiders in the Soviet elite stopped believing in Communism and wanted something else.
@Neofugue1@LawrenceGerald@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom He either displays complete ignorance of how the leftist mind actually works or simply wants to get close to the neoliberal power structure. The former is inexcusable for a person like him.
The leftist academic is not motivated by petty things us plebs value like “logic” and “clear thinking”. The leftist is irrational and usually has other motivations for his beliefs. Usually, power is one of the few things a leftist understands. To try to get them to “question Progressivism” is a fool’s errand. Their motivation for believing that shit is entirely irrational. They may make all sorts of pretensions about how rational and enlightened they are but all of that is bullshit lies and deception.
Just try logically refuting some of their inviolable tenets like materialism and you’ll see actual seething hatred from said academics. These people are not the kind that you can win over by rational argumentation. Dialectic is pointless if the desire for truth is not mutual. All you have without this mutual desire is force and violence.
@plotinus_enjoyer@Neofugue1@LawrenceGerald@Starprophet1@HonkHonkBoom Mischlings like Moldbug and kike faggots like BAP fall into the category of what I call "temporarily embarrassed academics" in that they desperately want to be accepted by a broader audience, have sinecures instead of day jobs, get invited to the cool cocktail parties, and go along to get along. They are strivers and in their own way, system pigs. Extremely limited utility. Your average /pol/ack is sharper and has a more coherent worldview.
Niccolo (Fisted By Foucalt) is a similar lesser life form. Mike Thernobich and Dickie Spencer would like to get to this level but neither one is smart or erudite enough, they're pure low-midwit
@TrevorGoodchild For easing into it the best modern author is Hans Herman Hoppe. He makes the logical case against democracy and once you cross that threshold the libertarian to fascist conveyer will whisk you to the proper conclusions.
My suspicion for some time is that it will be a massive military failure that knocks out the confidence in the US and that collapses the financial system.
Spiteful, neurotic, and at that point very panicked because their conventional forces are no longer sufficient, why wouldn't the arrogant retards let fly? Sort of how a woman cop often just shoots a man dead where a male cop might be able to subdue a suspect without killing him.