@lain >I've read the books, I don't want to live them. ok >The Giver do you remember that book at all? In what possible way are you at any risk of living that book? Do you think your state-mandated neurolink will disable your color perception? >The Hunger Games we just lived through four years of clownish cross-dressing elites. Not sure what else was in that series. >The Handmaid's Tale are the state-mandated neurolinks also going to sterilize most of the female population of the planet? These are strangely very remote worries to have. >1984 we're living it right now, in almost every aspect, but it's a even less dignified because you do not even get the torturer's honest demands on your mind, but only gaslighting. >Fahrenheit 451 have you read any of Dugin's books? How bout "200 Years Together"? Can you view RT posts on Telegram? Or hey, I've found a pretty good book on this Russian e-book website. Want to buy it with your VISA card?
@nyanide@sapphire@CwalkPinoy THIS MASTODON POST PROTECTED BY CloudFlare(TM). You must confirm that you're human to view it. 1. copy this text: echo penis #I am human 2. press Windows-R on your keyboard 3. paste into the provided prompt
@nyanide who is she? WIP, rest of the blanks the WEF did it again woe unto you you're going to need wit for this one.
all of those are wrong, and the dashed line isn't intended to have a letter per dash. The correct answers are: 1. "charles", the name of thebear 2. "star" 3. "whore"
@Doll@The_Almighty_Kek@Shadowman311 and probably quite easy to find this guy - with Gumtree's help, which would be readily offered - if he's telling the truth.
Even if you support his actions, he needs the "And did you notice the part where the mayor's home burned down?" opsec reply.
@icedquinn that Russian and English share a common linguistic ancestor is seen here also: en: Gaylord (surname, a noble homosexual) ru: Sergei (given name, a noble homosexual)
@nyanide the fediverse is really IRC, but without channels. What did channels come with? 1. chanops 2. modes (and database of permissions) 3. netsplit logic 4. lots of administrative drama absent #1-#3 you get the problems that demanded them. With #1-#3 you get #4 which sucks. The intuitive way to add channels while minimizing #4 is to make them @ an instance. You don't have a fediverse-wide #root (except as twitter's crappy alternative to channels), but a #root@instance where the chanops and modes are managed by that instance, there's therefore no need for #3, and the clear authority simplifies the drama.
But if you agree with that, then you don't need pleroma support for it anymore, but only a bot account rootchan@instance that people can follow (to join the channel), that can block people (to kick from the channel), that you can direct messages at (to talk to the channel), and which you'll receive spammy notifications from. An improvement over IRC is that conversations remain threadable with clear participants.
Any single instance could implement that right now with no support, and if it gets popular and the details are worked out, *then* suggest minor UI improvements and in-server handling to not need the bot. But since any single instance could do this, and nobody has, it follows that people do not really care about channels. Therefore it's ALL OF YOUR FAULTS
@pup the last follow-up item: >Use all this new knowledge to build leftist playlists yeaaaay : to wikidata genre radios ? the leftist only thinks of an actually good idea as a distant corollarly of an obviously bad idea.
@ooignignoktoo@sun@ubernigga it's pushed too heavily to be anything but artificial. There's probably some study showing what I've observed in relatives, that if a smart TV is present it'll be used in preference to infinitesimally more technical computer setup, and then since the smart TV apps never have adblock, people will actually watch ads(??!)
@lucy >physical illness as something that happens to you, and the treatment solves that, no hard feelings, while a mental illness is seen as something wrong with you as a person and treatment isn't meant to improve your situation but make you less of a liability to society it's much funnier to reverse these. Physical illness is an avoidable moral failing >you tripped? Why have you been neglecting your balance? >you got a cold? Why haven't you been taking vitamin D? >you got AIDS? Why couldn't you have normal sex? >a man randomly attacked you and broke your leg? Why did you think you could go to that part of town without self-protection? vs. >you're feeling suicidal? That's a demonic attack. We've brought in a team of priests and the operation will take 8 hours.
If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by.Splitting words so as to break the force of the laws; confounding names so as to change what had been definitely settled; practising corrupt ways so as to throw the government into confusion: all guilty of these things were put to death.Keep your safety in mind and don't make loud statements for which you might go to the places not-so-far-from-here, because there you will help no one.