Notices by ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️ (kingofwhiteamerica@poa.st), page 2

@reallyangry @brimshae @Turkleton @lord_nougat @Kirino Yeah I never owned a cellphone that wasn’t a smartphone; lived out that whole era deep in the fringes.

@BowsacNoodle @fknretardlol @reallyangry @Myles @Polfusilier line go up 😁

Yeah in my years alive, I’ve come to believe the debate between the various Economics models is whether mortar or asphalt should be used to build the Tower of Babel.

@fknretardlol @reallyangry @BowsacNoodle @Myles @Polfusilier Obviously nobody wants currency debasement; especially those profiting from it. But the financial sector has to pretend against any and all evidence that it’s essentially insignificant, or that margins will always outpace the loss. Anyone suggesting otherwise must be burned at the stake.

@BowsacNoodle @Myles @Polfusilier It’s one of those niggers-in-the-woodpile that nobody in the industry can even begin to address, without immediate “shun the non-believer; SHUUUUN!”

@BowsacNoodle @Myles @Polfusilier In either case it requires a functional Civilization in order to actually deliver; the outward form of retirement savings doesn’t mean very much if currency debasement outpaces all margins, right ?

@BowsacNoodle @stoner713 @Diogenese_Shiplap @transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf This is where better models, by taking transcendant intentional design into account as a valid possibility, yield a more plausible explanation.

@BowsacNoodle @Tactical I look sufficiently odd that I can pull it off without evoking such a response; yet still I do not.

@BowsacNoodle @transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf Sure sure; these are all well-reasoned assertions within the framework of the Standard Model. I don’t dispute the statistical validity of these data points; just that it represents an exhaustive description of all relevant factors that pertain to any given situation.

@BowsacNoodle @transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf Even if they are real, I do not believe I have sufficient, reliable data points to insist upon certainty regarding their nature. I am quite convinced there is a serious, mind-boggling amount of fuckery floating around.

@Someguy @BowsacNoodle You’re conflating ”jews”, “Judahites” and “Judeans”, and ignoring the ontological divide resultant from literal-God writing Himself into human history. I don’t have any real idea what you consider to be “Truth”, but Traditional Christianity follows logically and consistently from First Principles about which I became convinced after a decade or so of adulthood. As I was fiercely anti-Christian for over half of my life, I understand how pitifully insane I currently look to my earlier self. This has positive implications for my attitude toward skeptics, doubters and deniers. I get it.

@SleepingKiwi @Someguy I admit, I’m a sucker for explanatory power. Traditional Christianity towers mightily over any competing worldview, in explaining why things are as they are, and why they happened as they did.

@Captain80s @SleepingKiwi @Someguy It a literal damned shame the Scofield took root in American soil, when such excellent classical alternatives exist.

@Someguy @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried @fknretardlol @BowsacNoodle @reallyangry “Christianity” conveys little more than the most tenuous sorts of connections to historical Christendom. It says next to nothing about the actual Faith. “Christians” believe radically divergent things from one another. If you are making a statement regarding the relative truth or falsity of a given assertion, you must use qualifiers.