Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
To summarize,
Acknowledging that the Zionists murdered the Tsar of Russia,
exterminated 8,000,000 million Ukrainians in the Holomodor,
killed and goolaged the Soviets for nearly 75 years,
probably gamed WW2
backed Mao's terrors,
sunk the Liberty
did Sept 11 to get the neocons to engage in their 7 country plan,
controls the US govt by pedo blackmail
operates Palantir and the tyrannical (and retarded) Panopticon
were behind the poison jabs as targeted democide and control
and worse, all those horrible late night comedians,
is pretty terrible for a fake Christian academic who doesn't actually believe Christ is his shield and his sword and thus is a mere terrified atheist mortal holding on this world by bitten fingernails before the void
also see: Jordan B Peterson.
-
Embed this notice
It goes back to George I. Queen Anne's heirs were taken out by the people who owned the bank. Parliament even passed the 1701 Act of Settlement which was a major factor in his taking the crown. It was all planned. I blame Cromwell. But for him, the Bank of England would never have come to be. Yes, he didn't create it, but he created the condition that lead to it.
-
Embed this notice
@Zardoz @freemayonnaise It’s pretty fairly obvious to me that Rothschilds had taken over the British Crown by WWI. Old Mayer Amschel made London his base of operations in the late 18th Century, and grew his influence through their usual means. It’s also of note that the Opium War in China was instigated by the Sassoons, another trillionaire jewish family, and they and the Rothschilds have been intermarried since some decades before then iirc.
-
Embed this notice
The British role in Zionism is the real mystery, isn’t it?
I have so many questions about this.
is Zionism really a disguise for British Imperialism? Is ”The Crown” really the power behind the scenes, designing Israel as a way to bring the entire Middle East to heel while simultaneously tying the US to Israel for a double demolition?
DId the Crown subvert the Jews, or did the Crown itself become subverted while pulling its age-old strategy of pitting tribe against tribe?
-
Embed this notice
And what's further annoying about these facts and the total denial by this instance's ubermeschkopf (wojak omitted) is when somebody like @jazilla just today posts an interview from 2005 with Eustace Mullins who's just talking matter of factly about how the Zionists control the govt in DC, the police forces are all Federal Reserve forces and the CIA was in fact set up by the Brits and the BoE bank rolling it and it's rise to the top due to their deep pockets.
All roads sure seem to lead back to the Brits, while we're fed a diet of bullshit, narratives of exceptionalism, and obligation to Zionism.
-
Embed this notice
Nice! Thanks for those details. This era is huge gap in my understanding just as the history of Russia outlined in “200 Years Together” was completely unknown to me.
hmmmmm. probably a coincidence neither is taught in school or discussed amongst scholars.
-
Embed this notice
They usually just say seventeen pregnancies, of which five were live births, none of which survived to adulthood, was just bad luck or ill health.
I'm going to file that under bullshit.
-
Embed this notice
One other strange fact.... King George I brought the practice of having a mohel circumcise royal males to England.
-
Embed this notice
I just find it interesting that a crown that expelled jews up until Cromwell had Charles executed was suddenly giving them access to the penises of royal males. That's a pretty important organ for royal succession. Just saying.
-
Embed this notice
disgusting.
I saved my sons
from all needles and genital mutilators with home birth.
-
Embed this notice
An suimiúl. Is ansin an am a tagann an clann Rothschild go dtí an ḃreatann mór.
Very interesting. From what I can tell that's also around the time the rothschilds got involved in Britain.
-
Embed this notice
The Rothchilds came from a long line of court jews. They privatized because killing court jews was very common.