The amount of money they print does. If the ECB decides to create an extra trillion euros out of thin air for gay rights in the Ukraine then anyone holding euros is paying for it.
Inflation is caused by the supply of money being increased. Only the central bank and counterfeiters can do that, and only the central bank does it on any meaningful scale.
Ultimately I don't care about any of the regimes involved in this war so whichever one wins is fine by me. My only concern is how many goyim they manage to kill before they finally throw in the towel.
In jewlenski's case I suspect that answer would be "all of them" if he's not actively forced to make peace by a third party.
Western globalists are the ones who keep running colour revolutions in buffer states and adding them to NATO/USSR.
If it was reasonable for America to blockade Cuba in order to prevent the Soviets turning it into a missile base it's reasonable for Russia to prevent NATO from doing the same in the Ukraine.
As for the "meatwave attacks" thing... I wouldn't consider them paragons of concern for their men, but they're definitely showing more regard than Zelensky does. He's grabbing people off the street to shove in the trenches with little to no training/equipment.
As much as I hate him he is correct: Any resource that costs human labour is not a "right." Someone has to work for my food, why shouldn't it be me? Same goes for water.
The big issue with what nestle were doing in California is that they were abusing government power to gain access to a scarce resource and profit off of it.
There were problems with what nestle were doing, but it was a lot more subtle than "selling water is bad."
Specifically it was in CA in an area with an already low water table. There were all kinds of state restrictions in place for local businesses and residents to stop any one person from hoovering up all the water and causing problems for everyone else.
But like most western states a good chunk of the land is federal, so nestle went around the restrictions by obtaining a licence to bottle water on federal land, thus making huge profits from a resource everyone else has very restricted access to.
Well, there's usually luxury and convenience markets for bottled water, but yes that does add to it.
Come to think of it... I wonder if they deliberately tried to turn it into a "water should be free vs. pay up commie" argument just to get rid of the subtleties. Evil genius move if so.
Venice used to have a system where every square had a huge hollow under it filled with sand so it'd gradually filter water for public use. Then they had a well in the middle.
It used to be considered an honour for wealthy men to contribute to their community by funding a public resource like an aquaduct or even a sewer. It was considered a good way to preserve your name for posterity if there weren't any good wars to die in.
Nowadays we have this weird idea that any infrastructure worth investing in *must* be paid for by the state or something's wrong. The most people pay for is a park bench.