@jacklaridian@Serenus No. Reread their first post, as it accurately describes the issue. And no, critiquing someone’s decision to speak and on what subject and to whom, is not tone policing.
@PaulaToThePeople I like to think of gender as like clothing: there are people who have VERY strong opinions about what socks to pair with what pants, how to properly tie an ascot, etc., and there are people who know what pieces of clothing go together to make a tuxedo and will deliberately swap one out to make a statement, and there are those who are Donald Ducking it half the time.
I don’t think we’ll ever lose gender, but I do hope we can get to a point where all three
@PaulaToThePeople I think you’re treating this as a matter of possibility, and so seeing this as a rejection of the work you/people around you did, while I’m treating this as a matter of probability and the safety and happiness of everyone involved.
It’s great it worked out for you. There are many people whose circumstances are the same and had much worse outcomes.
I’d rather have many diverse, positive, and personal role models for people to have growing up than not.
@ATLeagle Had a word vomit reply that was about 2.5k characters and then just backed out by accident. Probably for the best. Not angry or debating just…trying to explain feelings and fears, talk like a person.
Anyways.
I get it, and I don’t like to fight people. I just know, personally, how misdirected, though legitimate, anger and failure of control turns into self-harm and obsessively focusing on keeping one’s own body (politic?) clean, and social media turbocharges it.
The right has been very good at shifting the Overton window. It won’t be shifted back within one, two, three elections; it was a decades long push and it will be a decades long push back.
@ATLeagle@QasimRashid Would there? I’d think if it were as simple as that that 3rd party candidates, especially in local races, would be getting far more of the electorate than they are.
I think the simple reality is that it’s much harder to turn a nonvoter into a voter than it is to turn a voter into a voter for one party.
That, and when the party must be a big tent in order to succeed, reflecting every aspect of its individual elements is simply impossible.
@ATLeagle@QasimRashid If half the left consistently sits out every election, and Biden only needs to pull fractions of percents of Trump’s support in order to win, and he’s clearly trying to be the president for all Americans, do you think he’ll shift to the left or to the center?
Baking pro-tip: if you didn’t plan on baking and so did not pre-soften your butter and you are baking NOW, if you get the butter out and then search “how to soften butter quickly” and then click on “why butter has to be soft” and then on links about how different fat contents and temperatures affect the size and stability of the air bubbles and on and on and on, the butter will be sufficiently soft by the time you remember what you were doing.
@ATLeagle@thomasapowell@davidgerard Some definitely will, but others won’t because those companies will keep their prices low enough that they’re competitive.
Think of how phone trees, self-service lines, listicles/generic written garbage and customer service chatbots have proliferated. If enough of the big players do it long enough, it becomes the norm, and fewer people will be able to justify (especially to their bosses) paying extra.
@thomasapowell@ATLeagle@davidgerard I think they see it as investment that will pay exponential dividends in the future when they have even greater economic leverage to drive salaries down.
@thomasapowell@ATLeagle@davidgerard They’ll push hard to use it to replace entry level jobs, retail jobs, customer service/HR jobs, etc., many of which are more commonly held by women, younger people, and minorities, thus putting greater economic pressure on those groups and pushing many out of the workforce. They’ll tout them as increasingly necessary studying aides for the increasingly necessary college degrees for the vanishing middle class level positions.
@StillIRise1963 What constitutes child abuse will change DRASTICALLY.
Mixed race couple? Child abuse. Queer couple? Child abuse. Failure to put children through Christian style religious schools? Child abuse. Feeding children any nonstandard (read: must contain meat, dairy) diet? Child abuse. Beating children? Ehhhh, that’s a matter of degree, wouldn’t you say?
@Oggie@QueerInTheCountry@StillIRise1963 Lotta people thinking that people were hysterical for thinking Roe could fall, but fall it did, and then Thomas explicitly cited Griswold (contraception), Lawrence (private sexual behaviour), and Obergefell (same sex marriage) as next on the chopping block.
I don’t know what I’m doing, either.I do a fair amount of boosting which, for me, means “this post has value”, so not necessarily that I agree with it.Following is open, no worries if you dip in and dip out. I tend to wait to follow until I’ve interacted with you a bit first.