“I can’t leave Substack, the alternatives charge monthly fees!”
For a mid-sized paid newsletter, you will pay:
Ghost Pro: $149–$269/month
Beehiiv: $131–$218/month
Buttondown: $239/month
Mailchimp: $285/month
Substack: $700/month
“I can’t leave Substack, the alternatives charge monthly fees!”
For a mid-sized paid newsletter, you will pay:
Ghost Pro: $149–$269/month
Beehiiv: $131–$218/month
Buttondown: $239/month
Mailchimp: $285/month
Substack: $700/month
(this is based on assumptions of 20,000 members, 7% paid at $5/mo. twiddle the math as you see fit)
@matthew Beehiiv is free for up to 2,500 subscribers. ConvertKit is free up to 10,000.
@molly0xfff All of this is true, but I'd guess that most of those making that complaint have a small enough number of subscribers that they're "free" on the substack plan. To move from $0 to even a $50/month Ghost Pro entry level plan for the same number of users is a prohibitive jump in out-of-pocket costs.
Cheapest option is self-hosting, though of course there is added time cost and a technical barrier to entry. I pay $100–$150/mo to self-host Ghost with a bit over 25,000 subscribers.
For free newsletters, Beehiiv is free for up to 2,500 subscribers. ConvertKit is free up to 10,000.
@molly0xfff It's like a Drug.
@molly0xfff You're a software engineer. Have you considered ways you could help people move into some sort of self/cloud hosting?
Maybe authors could join pools that people buy into and can read a certain number of articles. Maybe you have teams of editors that compile articles for people to read (like the algorithms do today sort of) and they could buy into that and they could buy from the authors.
Cloud costs scale. Traffic can be distributed. Hosting is just technically heavy.
@crazyeddie helping people self-host at some point just becomes a hosting business, which all of these services provide for (with the exception of Substack) reasonable fees
Adding to this thread because a bunch of people are asking: newsletters are expensive to run because of mailsending, not because of hosting costs. ~70% of my cost is for bulk email. A plain old static blog can be hosted for a couple bucks a month.
@molly0xfff a static blog, you say
@eleventy ❤️
@usul bulk email sending is a nightmare i would wish upon no one. sending is easy, delivering is hard.
@molly0xfff wouldnt self hosting email bé cheaper?
@notplants Mailgun, which is what Ghost requires. I hope at some point they’ll add connectors for other providers.
@molly0xfff when you say you self-host ghost and 70% of your cost is for bulk email, do you mean that you use another paid external service for e-mail sending? and if so, id be curious which one
ty for these stats, this is very interesting
personally, im not at all up for the personal task of trying to self-host an email server and stay out of spam folders, so curious what you are using for bulk email sending.
@aeva nope, i don’t use any tracking
@molly0xfff fascinating. do you have an estimate on how many subscribers typically read newsletter posts?
@sashin I self-host Ghost, which sends emails via Mailgun
@molly0xfff What do you use to send emails? Button down?
@molly0xfff The well known liberal and progressive names on substack can afford it. They don't want to lose readers who may not bother following them to their new platform.
@Methylcobalamin moving away from Substack is pretty much seamless on the subscriber end
For those who aren’t a fan of my 20,000 number, here’s a breakdown:
@simrob it is, she’s said 70%, but that doesn’t explain the jump in cost from 50k subs to 100k, it isn’t linear
@GuillaumeRossolini @simrob yeah, it’s the mailsending.
50k subs ≈ 100,000 emails/mo: $75
100k subs ≈ 400,000 emails/mo: $400
@simrob no, ineiti’s question is indeed about the self hosted version, and I was wondering the same
@GuillaumeRossolini @ineiti @molly0xfff oh, my apologies. Molly alluded to this: anywhere you're hosting from is almost certain to block outgoing emails, so you have to use a separate email delivery service like Mailgun. That's probably the vast majority of her expense.
@ineiti @molly0xfff ghost pro isn't self-hosting, it's a company's managed hosting option
@molly0xfff Wow - I love people who can whip a table like that like it's nothing. Always takes me hours to get everything right...
Probably stupid question: why is the self-hosting Ghost quintupling in price between 50k and 100k subscribers? What is the step taken?
@molly0xfff Not matter how easy it is, I think a lot of people just wouldn't bother.
@Methylcobalamin it’s not a question of whether they’d bother, there’s no effort required by the subscriber
@kharrison no, it’s 10k now
@molly0xfff Isn’t ConvertKit only free up to 1,000? Pricing similar to mailchimp.
@Methylcobalamin It’s scary to shake things up if it’s your income, and there is certainly non-zero effort on the writer’s end in moving. Plus Substack really likes to talk up its network effects, to try to instill concern that people will see their growth flatline if they leave.
@molly0xfff Why do you think people who can easily afford those new platform fees haven't been migrating?
@kenny113 Does RSS with simple username:password via .htaccess work?
@molly0xfff Self-hosted Ghost looks like the most sensible option.
And you can use the hosting to host your blog, too, as a point of contact.
@molly0xfff @usul from a tech stack perspective, distribution sure would be a lot easier if authenticated RSS was a thing (besides clear text feed tokens). Any other solutions on the horizon?
@publictorsten this *could* be solved with end-to-end signatures.
GnuPG sign every email, at mailservers accept properly signed emails from recipients your users authorized by sending an email to you (the subscription email) which contains a one-time secret your mailserver checks (provided in the mailto:link as subject).
If the different GnuPG frontends were actually compatible.
@devtrash @molly0xfff
@devtrash @molly0xfff To phrase it otherwise: a problem with moderation?
@molly0xfff Interesting. How has this happened? Why do we need expensive centralized services to use the very egalitarian protocol SMTP?
@publictorsten @molly0xfff spammers
@huxley yes, it would be offset in most cases.
@molly0xfff stupid question, but isn't that cost offset by payment for the subs? if I have 20000 subs how much is that bringing in? (if self-hosting, I assume 20000 "subs" is no income at all)
@jarekkopec Substack has always boasted of portability, but they seem to be rapidly building walls with things like their “follow” feature. Ghost is excellent. Not personally super familiar with the others.
@molly0xfff How do these platform compare when it comes to owners control of the user data? Is it easy to migrate between platforms?
@saxnot mailing lists may be free but successfully doing bulk mailsending very much is not
@molly0xfff a newsletter is just a mailing list with only admins being able to send, right?
mailing lists are free
@flo kit is more expensive at my size. not sure about brevo because i’m apparently “enterprise” and would have to request a quote.
that aside, self-hosted Ghost currently doesn’t support mailsending services besides Mailgun, though I hope they will build out support for it in the not too distant future
@molly0xfff Not sure if they fit your needs, but kit and brevo seem a lot cheaper for your volume.
@molly0xfff
Lemmy? [ducks!]
@molly0xfff This is the most impressive piece of alt-text I have ever seen.
@jeremiah they hide the price because it’s not an up-front flat fee (like most of its competitors), but a cut of subscription revenue
@molly0xfff substack costs $700/month?! God damn. I thought it was more they were providing a solid enough product at VC subsidy prices.
@vampirdaddy I think checking the sig should be enough, yes.
Since this is a likely non-sensitive newsletter, it wouldn’t even have to be encrypted. The initial subscription mail just has the intention of telling the receiver mailserver that the newsletter address is genuine.
@ArneBab Is PGP crypt-then-sign or sign-then-crypt?
If the first, then directly checking the signature should be sufficient?
@truh @molly0xfff @usul strange how many replies I get from people I didn’t ask on mastodon. but since we’re here…
certainly there are two sides to that coin. likewise, there are consumers who would be interested in subscribing but would never pay to get more email either. paid email newsletters don’t make a lot of sense to a lot of people. and clearly there are huge distribution issues with email (as we’re discussing here) which can be overcome with different distribution channels. For example, @404mediaco offers a public RSS feed for all articles, but you simply can’t read full articles for members-only content. I would be interested to hear from someone who offers subscription content about why they chose the distribution channel they chose and if they see any “universal solutions” on the horizon.
@kenny113 @molly0xfff @usul I'd guess that the problem is more that you loose a lot of your readers if RSS is the only form of subscription you offer.
Feed token seems good enough for that purpose. Most probably also work with basic auth but I'm not sure that's really better in any way.
@screwturn Scroll down for a chart comparing pricing for newsletters of all sizes.
@molly0xfff
This made me laugh
I have 31 subscribers to my newsletter, and the notion of having 20,000 sounds so unlikely that it is funny.
Thanks
@jeromechoo @usul I consider those to fall into the same category of services where you pay someone to do mailsending for you
@molly0xfff @usul Is this true even with tools like Sendy that uses Amazon SES?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.