@GossiTheDog
Online sales are (if I read the statistics correctly) ~120 million GBP per year, but that's just 1% of the total 13 billion.

While 130mio is quite a sum,
1% of your business is not.

Plus the online shop probably cannot limp along with pen and paper, but probably needs the fully working IT.

With proper BCM they probably concentrate on rebuildíng key servers (and pen&paper) to keep the business from sinking completely.

Then the 1% online shop probably takes a back seat.

@GossiTheDog

Rebuilding business is prioritised by importance. If the online shop is a small side hustle compared to the brick&mortar ones (or is much slower), then it’s lower priority.

Communicating the current status and expected progress is better, builds trust.

Wages usually are handled as lump payment, i.e. the same sum as last mont - and corrected later when the HR systems are back online.

The incidence response team should cover IT forensics, BCM and communication.

@GossiTheDog
Recommendation:
do it on paper, with all the necessary confidentiality & secrecy markings and stamps, file it to the proper restricted filing cabinets/reading rooms,
and answer to the request mail:
"can be inspected with the proper clearance in the confidential files reading room XY of facility ABC under file no. 12345"

@GossiTheDog
source ?

Because ... made up? That's just so over the top, that can't be ... right? Please? I mean... even thinking that might not be absurd enough seemed completely off the charts a month ago, but...
Please?

@ArneBab
I'm contemlating building a LLM-trap, with some hundreds/thousands of (pre-generated) fake articles, where the said bots are server-side misguided to.

Generation would be common texts (Gutenberg?) but with statistically randomly shifted/replaced ...
hm ... would be filtered out as it's random noise.

Or maybe just replace articles, pronouns, especially numbers etc in a consistent way to increase statistically relevance?

@ArneBab Is PGP crypt-then-sign or sign-then-crypt?
If the first, then directly checking the signature should be sufficient?

@ArneBab
Ah - Überspezialisierung der Typen, ähnlich wie Klassen in Java?

Da sind generische Typen besser, die den Verarbeitungstyp festlegen - so dass die Variablengröße und Verarbeitung sauber definiert ist

Number: Int, Float (ggfs. unterschiedliche)

Multidim: Vector, Matrix, Complex

String

generic: Array, Dictionary, Stack, FIFO/Buffer (Ringbuffer)

composite: JSON-style, not predefined

@ArneBab
Okay, ich sehe das Problem - geht nur unelegant in einer von allen eingelesenen, shared Präambel-Datei.

Wenn die Typen zu eng definiert sind und dann die Struktur so weit ändern, dass die Funktionen angepasst werden müssen - dann muss ich entweder jeweils konvertieren oder alle anpassen.

Hatte Typescript nicht Fixpoint-Typen, die dann in der Runtime als schnöde Standard-Floats waren? Und man sich dann über Rundungsfehler wundert?

From: @ArneBab
https://rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab/113488367180573220

@ArneBab Wieso zu starke Kopplung? Gut, ich muss dann ggfs explizit konvertieren - aber dafür habe ich dann auch die Gewähr, dass mit die Funktion nicht Runtime-Errort.

Ich kann eine explizite Typprüfung in die Funktionen legen - verliere dann aber Fehlererkennung zur Compile-Time.

@hongminhee JavaScript plattform being problematic?

@erik @agturcz @lanodan
nope - as "wank" is a valid german word, based on form “wanken” = to sway.

So a Wankpanzer would be a Swaying Tank.
Thus Wank Tank is preferable, IMHO.