@dansup doesn’t it do that natively? By virtue of the activitypub protocol
Notices by Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 20:56:40 JST Guillaume Rossolini -
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 23-Sep-2024 21:05:38 JST Guillaume Rossolini @lanodan even in the link you shared, they say at the start
On all of the operating systems, I took the default settings
Which it seems to me, fine, but that isn’t complete or representative
There could be at least three categories:
- default settings
- I took a stab at optimization, don’t quote me
- community reviewed best settings
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 23-Sep-2024 21:02:30 JST Guillaume Rossolini @lanodan yep, this looked like some interesting problems to determine the capabilities of a language, gauge how fit each is as a general purpose tool, identify possible shortcomings
But actual applications in the wild don’t necessarily implement these edge cases often (or ever), and that’s perhaps what that warning was about
If you’re going to benchmark, at least share your versions and settings so that they are readily available to readers. And if you write an article covering the research, do the same?
That said, I’m no researcher
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 23-Sep-2024 20:27:29 JST Guillaume Rossolini @lanodan yeah, same here on all counts
Plus the Wikipedia page on this methodology does warn about shortcomings in this benchmark
The developers themselves highlight the fact that those doing research should exercise caution when using such microbenchmarks
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Computer_Language_Benchmarks_Game
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 07:06:39 JST Guillaume Rossolini @feditips
On a side note, I'm wondering whether we should be telling people they "shouldn't use this button" on the grounds that it likely won't do what they probably think it will?Perhaps the phrasing could be along the lines of, before using that magic button, learn what it actually does?
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 06:07:21 JST Guillaume Rossolini Fyi I'm reading from @jerry 's instance and your edit doesn't show, 1h later (almost 90 minutes from what I see)
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 07-Mar-2023 02:19:16 JST Guillaume Rossolini @evan
I do believe we are talking about the same thing, at least, that was my intentDistance might not be the only or the main reason, and respondents may not have made the link between the polls (I hadn't)
-
Embed this notice
Guillaume Rossolini (guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 06-Mar-2023 23:13:02 JST Guillaume Rossolini @evan
I can think of a few other reasons that could change one's mind, at least where train and plane are concerned:- Having to go through complex security procedures (train tends to be easier) cross border
- Having to go way outside the city to get to/from the transport hub
- Noise levels (deafening vs normal)
- Ability to stand up, stretch your legs
- Snack choice and when to get them
- Environmental concerns (fuel per 1000 km per 1000 passengers)