@Hoss@Tony@Alex_Fog@BowsacNoodle@ForbiddenDreamer@TimeSpent@sj_zero moving back here was crazy because i forgot just how chunky the locks are. double very thick doors two types of keys, with judging by the keys a fair amount of pins, have to turn like 3-4 times around per door in the much more dangerous than here and definitely worse than average there part of the states i lived in this was just like a thin door with very very shitty lock standard and like a single term bolt with just as weak a lock which i kid you not broke off at one point
genuinelly what the fuck is wrong with the american markets? atleast it makes for funny videos when they are trying to ram the door down of the one guy with a strong door and lock
@Hoss@Tony@Alex_Fog@BowsacNoodle@ForbiddenDreamer@TimeSpent that's that reputation but its honestly quite exaggerated, atleast in self referring patients that is which should be the norm. still more than normal though. that's cbt the default though, which while it might help other things is probably barely gonna do jack shit to bpd. you need dbt therapy, and that actually proves effective and hasn't shown any real signs of such a problem with bpd patients. i dont think either make it WORSE though, and the stigma definitely harms people from getting good treatment thus prolonging the shit they cause to everybody
@BowsacNoodle@Tony@Alex_Fog@ForbiddenDreamer@TimeSpent@Hoss dialectical behaviour therapy. basically, teaching self control and emotional regulation and shit in a way that actually applies to people with extreme emotions and instability and mood swings and shit like that. cuz ilke the emotions are too strong for the usual development to keep them under control basically. its like the only treatment that actually helps that shit and its generally foudn to be quite effective, but it can be hard to find and most will never recieve it. i've had a very limited amoutn of it and it even helped my bpd a lot compared to what it used to be personalyl, so i imagine going full in really does help as much as they claim. technically it can apply to a few things but its almost exclusively a tailor made treatment for bpd.
though i'm sure a lot of manic bpd bitches would go wild for crazy shit like being chained to the radiator
@sun@feld@threat@newt its honestly partially an architectural issue in that regard. telegram has the e2ee and regular chats as seperate, whilst in xmpp they are necessary one and the same with the encryption overlaid and can be mixed freely. the XMPP clients dont do it that great but such sharp a division wouldn't really be too easy or accurate to what your actually doing. i feel like it could be better but the red messages or noticable red locks if somebody sends unencrypted messages when you were encrypted are a pretty reasonable way of doing this. personally i would prefer if there were better controls for the the end to end encryption. there's the obvious issues with like dead users and groupchats and shit, but i mean, if issues do come up and things dont go through or cant send at the very least you could give an actual button to reset the encryption there, change up the private keys, all that good shit, new ratchet. but there's really no way to interact directly on most clients and generally it merely boils down to whether you trust or not a billion different fucking keys a shitty client generates
@sun@threat@newt to be fair the telegram e2ee has some sketchy shit in it aswell, but for the day to day user who is not targetted i'm sure its fine. but i wouldn't put the most trust after they straight up inserted an obvious backdoor and then removed after everybody pointed it out
@newt@threat@sun I would generally agree, while he brings up good points he seems to make the biggest deal out of very little for the sole matter of not doing things exactly how signal does it. matrix is a pretty easy target everybody knows its had shit security in forever, but his xmpp article definitely was a pretty blatant case of bias. like he even referenced the signal docs agreeing at a point but stated its still bad because it wasn't justified well enough, and he made a mistake in the article but refused to correct it only leaving a note blaming writing quality. these types of trumped up non issues are fucking insufferable. i haven't read the latest matrix article yet but i am sure this will have no affect on my opinion of him, mostly smart, but insufferable and a shill. both in personality any in focus.
to quote the article of this devout signal evangelist, > But in return, I really don’t appreciate unsolicited evangelism towards any technology.
Because of our broken instincts, we are in pain. We continue living in pain, because our instincts have been twisted by reason. So, what are we supposed to do? Should we abandon knowledge? Throw away reason? In any event, that wouldn't be possible. For better or for worse, we ate the fruit of knowledge long, long ago.