@newt @threat @sun I would generally agree, while he brings up good points he seems to make the biggest deal out of very little for the sole matter of not doing things exactly how signal does it. matrix is a pretty easy target everybody knows its had shit security in forever, but his xmpp article definitely was a pretty blatant case of bias. like he even referenced the signal docs agreeing at a point but stated its still bad because it wasn't justified well enough, and he made a mistake in the article but refused to correct it only leaving a note blaming writing quality. these types of trumped up non issues are fucking insufferable.
i haven't read the latest matrix article yet but i am sure this will have no affect on my opinion of him, mostly smart, but insufferable and a shill. both in personality any in focus.

to quote the article of this devout signal evangelist,
> But in return, I really don’t appreciate unsolicited evangelism towards any technology.