@KingOfWhiteAmerica@BowsacNoodle Imho bans on running for public office are issued by the church to insulate itself from danger by a hostile government, and can be rescinded at will by the patriarch. Even if there is a "ban", minor clergy would just need a letter of permission, only major clergy (deacon and up) and monastics would be seriously restricted.
He is a novice, which I believe is monastic side, acolyte is clergy equivalent. Novices have no standing, and if they exibit a lack of humility it is a negative sign, so Im surprised hes not kicked out yet due to the videos. I dont think running for office shows hes ready for a monastery either. All that would happen is his abbot would ask him to stop, and if he doesnt, he would lose novice standing. He can resume novice standing once he corrects, it has no penalty for failure. Now.... if the Abbott wants him to run for public office.... then that Abbott might be in serious trouble, but Nathaniel would not be.
Also this is ROCOR, they are an odd anomaly and not really how a church should be run. They are under Moscow Patriarchate, but functionally are permitted to run independently. It is only taken seriously because its existence is considered temporary and so far they havent stepped on any toes.
If you say "in a hypothetical world where returning to europe would let whites flourish and survive for all time" I would of course say yes if I want to engage in that hypothetical.
But we might as well ask a hypothetical - "What if I shit a dog?" Well, it would bark.
Question has a false inbuilt premise. Whites survive by going forth, conquering, and inventing our way out of quagmires, overcoming problems. Not by hiding or retreating or escaping.... lets say we went back to Europe, which doesnt have enough farmland to feed 1/3 of its population or oil at all. How long would we last before being wiped out by muslims who HAVE oil, or anyone else?
What we care about are EUROPEAN Americans. As of 2017, European Americans are 133 million. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Americans I don't think its grown much since then, lets say 135 million even for 2024.
Leftist estimate of illegals is 12 million https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States But they dont count arrested or asylum claimants, since theyre "in the system" and thus not illegal. And they dont count the uncaught or minors. I estimate its over 50 million, but lets go with 12 for now.
135/(335+12)*100=38%
Thirty eight percent, with a best case leftist illegal estimate. A more reasonable estimate of illegals drops it to low 30s.
We are in deep shit and we wont get out if people dont know about it.
If you believe that CHRIST DIED for our sins according to the scriptures; And that HE WAS BURIED, and that HE ROSE again the third day according to the scriptures you are saved.
Ok what if you believe all that with all your heart at one point, but LATER in the TIMELINE, reject Christ and the Holy Spirit, and engage in nonstop unrepentant sinning? Are you saved AFTER the rejection, or can "nothing" separate you from Christ as you said, not even your actions as you said.
By the way, people have been asking ^^^^^^ this fucking question 20-30 times and you keep deflecting.
And then lets not talk about the half-negroid italians and half-moor spaniards, or the persian mix greeks, giving them quinine causes the same bad reaction as giving africans quinine.
Btw have you seen the Brits lately? Or their colonies? They all smell like curry, and Amerinoids are mutted to fuck 5ft tall creaturas.
Or maybe its jewish to do this divide & conquer shit.
The problem with "faith alone" is that you can't point at a pastors 1000sqft mansion and ten ferraris and say "brother you are not christian" because the church is falling apart. The pastor can counter with "i have faith, therefore im Christian" and it is an ultimate trump card. Works are a worldly receipt for faith, they should be synonymous, only a liar would separate works from faith. Because he does one thing, and claims to believe another, which is called a lie.
It is wrong to "side" with Paul or James, they are both part of the Bible, and both Paul and James are in 100% full agreement on faith and works. It is the interpretation that is flawed and only the interpretation that is flawed, the Holy Writ is by definition correct.