@aeva Comcast Business. Costs *way* more but they categorically screw with you less than a residential plan. We have someone working full time from home so the reliability is worth it.
@aeva Business plan costs a bit more than Xfinity service, but includes unlimited data. One other upside is that Xfinity speed tiers are a "maximum" and Comcast Business speed tiers are a "minimum". Business service will exceed the labeled speed pretty much all the time. Note however that while Business can install in your "home office", they cannot install TV, so if you need that, you end up with Xfinity for TV and Comcast Business for Internet (and no bundle pricing).
@ainmosni@GossiTheDog There's nothing inherently wrong, of course, with meeting your spouse at work, but it happens so much more often in these companies because the employee's entire social circle *is* the company.
@ainmosni@GossiTheDog The free on-site amenities and events are huge. It's not just about keeping you on campus, it's about tying your whole life to the company. A few of the people I have argued with the loudest were "Googler with Googler spouse" which is just... absolute corporate success. The entire family is company-owned.
@ainmosni@GossiTheDog Yep, one of my favorite "shills Google on HN in his free time" guys got laid off by them last year, and I had a good laugh about it.
@GossiTheDog The other fun fact is that a bunch of these companies have like 100,000 employees, and they get *really upset* if you point out on HN or the like that they are stanning their employer.
I have been accused of "doxxing" for merely pointing out a guy loudly justifying why Google was the best at everything was a manager on their Ads team.
@deadsuperhero For what it's worth, I don't think it's really ideal to say "shut up unless you can code". Forgejo started as a fork of principles first, and code second.
But what feels really silly is that the driver here is not bad behavior but baseless speculation of bad behavior.
@Legit_Spaghetti@paul@WarnerCrocker Apparently not: "A similar situation came up before the 2020 presidential election. ... Ohio lawmakers approved changing the cutoff to 60 days — but only for that election."
@Edelruth@Legit_Spaghetti@paul@WarnerCrocker Yeah I mean moving the date of a big event is a big ordeal and a lot of wasted money, but this is major US political party level money involved, it's not like that's a hard problem.
@ariadne@scott@msw If the OSI wanted to support open source, it would've worked with companies like Elastic, Mongo, and Redis to approve licenses which enabled open source companies to thrive. Instead it's primary role in the past few years is protecting a proprietary SaaS platform from having to pay for stuff.
The OSI is really not very supportive of open source software at the end of the day.
@ariadne@scott@msw The OSI is sort of a joke and should be discounted entirely. Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft are their top sponsors in that order, which is why they're militantly opposed to strong copyleft licenses like the SSPL.
@ariadne@wwahammy@scott@msw Saying it's not open source because the Amazon-backed corporate shill outlet says it's not is a tautology. We can fix that by throwing out the OSI.
And a company which releases all of their code under GPL or MIT can use SSPL code for free. It's literally a license that promotes open source.
@theuni@schmittlauch@ariadne@wwahammy@scott@msw@Atemu The SSPL authors likely would've clarified it in a 1.1 version if the OSI was willing to meaningfully engage, but the desire to protect their sponsors was too strong. While clarification in the terms would be nice, I don't think there's actually an intention to say open source licensed components would have to be relicensed to meet the license's needs. They were trying to keep the license text as close to AGPL as possible.