Here’s thought… We know the dark web exists, in parallel with the rest of the Internet, and we know the mainstream Internet is becoming increasingly enshittified by tech bros’ greed and AI. Would it be possible to create a ‘light web’ that excludes the bad stuff? What would it look like? #future#Internet
What Labour _should_ be saying is “we are grateful to the Supreme Court for highlighting the ambiguity of the current law, and we will be bringing forward emergency legislation to resolve the issue as soon as is practicable. It has always been this Government’s position that trans women are women and trans men are men”.
@christineburns The non-conspiracy theory would be that the markets still believe Musk’s bullshit about the imminent release of robo-taxis. I suppose that’s just about possible, if people refuse to learn from Musk’s history.
@selzero isn’t the strict definition of terrorism “violence or the threat of violence with political objectives”? So it all depends _why_ things are done. With that definition, targeting Teslas probably is terrorism. (Sorry to be the reply guy. 🫣)
@inthehands I hate how university education is nowadays seen entirely in terms of its future financial payoff. What happened to personal development, to love of knowledge for knowledge sake, to becoming a person who can benefit society?
@bruces Insecure IoT devices has been a issue from the outset. Short of requiring a security certification before they can be sold, I’m not sure the problem can be fixed. So maybe that needs to be part of CE compliance?
Classic enshittification trajectory, driven by companies whose dev teams don’t even know there’s a problem.
@VeroniqueB99@sand The advert isn’t aimed at Trump, of course, it’s aimed at all those who might be persuaded to join the growing anti-Trump movement. Let’s hope it has some impact.
@dalias@christineburns@scaramanga@dominic Perhaps Musk’s biggest problem is if he succeeds. At that point his backers have no further use for him and he’ll be left dangling in the wind.
@openrightsgroup Why is promoting the BlueSky protocol suite better than investing in the Fediverse? This seems to me to be a land-grab by BlueSky. #ChangeMyMind
@neckspike@rainynight65@mekkaokereke Classic case of the costs not being born by the right people. Just imagine how much forest management you could do with the $50 billion that the damage costs each year!
@sjvn Alt text: a minimalist line cartoon of Jimmy Carter being welcomed into heaven by God. Jimmy’s speech bubble reads “How can I help?” #altText4you
@CelloMomOnCars Seems to me that if you do something knowing there will be bad consequences, you should be liable for those consequences whatever the timescale in which they materialise. Oil companies, for example, have known for well over half a century that they were causing climate change. That should make them liable for the effects of their products. The sam3 argument could be made about Governments that continue to subsidise fossil fuel production.
@inthehands (2) (the genocide) is enabling (1) (the antisemitism). But Netanyahu likes that, because the more vulnerable Jews feel, the more they will look for a ‘tough’ leader. It’s hard to imagine a more irresponsible strategy to maintain personal power.
Escapee from Twitter, and now from home.social too. 🫤 Tofu-loving woke ex EU citizen. Retired hi-tech entrepreneur, once focused on future cities/buildings, climate & UBI, now keen on saving the planet and democracy. I dream of the day when I can return my focus to my first loves.If you don’t like #politics, you probably shouldn’t follow me. 😁 Though I do also have a #creative side, and I'm a #maker too.he/him Still masking