Notices by chud (chud@nicecrew.digital)
-
Embed this notice
Our only good diner closed and the remaining one is gross af 😭
-
Embed this notice
Ngl I go to those kinds of places now because inflation means it's either $14 for a decent burger made by hipsters or $14 for a worse burger at the deli
-
Embed this notice
THere arEn't more than Like 10 People on fedi. The rest is just bots. Watch Me post this from my othEr accounts.
-
Embed this notice
The room is entirely empty except for a mirror, two bags and some empty amazon boxes. This is silly
-
Embed this notice
I cant stand them. No ability to have a regular conversation. I'll say, "why are miracles like the resurrection of Christ held to a higher standard for evidence?" and they'll jump into this esoteric "well you have to include Hume's paradigm of incredulity when parsing the import of the alleged violation of nomic laws in a Bayesian probability context" shit.
Like nigga just use regular words what the fuck is wrong with you
-
Embed this notice
13th amendment was ratified in 1865 and for 60 years the courts maintained it didn't apply to Indians. Don't listen to retards who tell you birthright citizenship is a constitutional mandate.
-
Embed this notice
You can't really discount miracles without a reason, the logic is circular. We don't believe in historical claims in miracles because we don't have evidence for miracles. We don't have evidence for miracles because we dismiss claims of miracles out of hand. They should be held to the same standard as any other historical claim.
Most historical events of importance are documented in multiple sources that have certain conflicting details, but if they agree on certain claims, those claims have weight.
-
Embed this notice
The historical claims for Jesus Christ's resurrection are extraordinarily compelling. History, as a discipline, doesn't prove facts, but it weighs the probability of claims and theories against each other. Modern scholastics have been doing an increasingly good job placing the historical claims of Christianity in their 1st century jewish context, allowing for very compelling arguments regarding, for example, the criterion of embarrassment.
Despite what philosophers like Hume assert, miracles aren't something we can dismiss out of hand. If you view the miracle of the resurrection like any other historical claim, there are few arguments against it and many coherent arguments for it. From a historiographical perspective, the gospels should probably be taken just as seriously as any other biography in their genre (e.g., Agricola by Tacitus). Textual criticism heavily supports this conclusion.
-
Embed this notice
I want a woman with T80 eyes
-
Embed this notice
She's Episcopalian. Catholicism hasn't yet fallen.
-
Embed this notice
He actually might have better luck flipping it around that backblast ain't nothing to fuck with
-
Embed this notice
Sometimes it goes full circle and you accidentally rip your skin open by getting too much superglue on your fingertips and once you're done getting all the dried glue off you can close the wound with superglue
-
Embed this notice
New Camry's are hybrid-only. End of an era.
-
Embed this notice
I'm almost afraid to actively pay attention to him because anyone who does starts becoming a psychopath who would cut off their own hands if it meant inconveniencing DSP
-
Embed this notice
Lol private firemen. $5 million dollar investment to start and high upkeep with huge insurance and liability requirements. Who thinks of this garbage
-
Embed this notice
Owned by jews :( many such cases
-
Embed this notice
You definitely seem stupid, to answer your question.
Christians have killed many people. Most of them deserved it. Many did not. Our religion never claimed that we would create worldly perfection. Quite the opposite - we know we aren't perfect, and won't be made perfect for some time.
You don't get to compare belief systems based on "how many people did they kill?" This is putting the cart before the horse. If you want to choose the religion with the lowest body count then some schizophrenic guy who has never hurt someone and created his own religion based on his Harry Potter fanfiction would, in your moral view, be superior. That's obviously ridiculous. Deaths caused by Christians, both good and bad, have literally 0 impact on the validity of the faith. Knowing someone by their fruits doesn't mean "judge the entire faith by its fruits" - it's telling you how to tell if someone is truly inspired by God.
I won't convince you to become Christian over the Internet and if I did, I'd be worried about your mental faculties. But I implore you to be open to it and to appreciate that the faith is fundamentally loving and encourages kindness.
-
Embed this notice
I can't see who you're replying to but this is a pretty shit essay. I won't refute every point because it will take forever. I ended up stopping my criticisms about halfway through because it's clear that you have no actual understanding of Christianity and are just opposed to its core concepts. I recommend adopt a more charitable and open mind towards the faith.
-Jews or jew-run countries did half of the bad things in your bullet points. The Nazis wanted to get rid of Christianity after the war ended.
-The "No True Scotsman" fallacy does not apply here; ironically, you're using it fallaciously. The argument is not "true Christians are always good" - we acknowledge there are bad ones. You have misunderstand the fallacy.
-Christians like Mother Theresa helping people injured by secular countries like the UK are not proof of anything except the goodness of individual Christians.
-Isaac was at least in his teens, and potentially even older, at the time of the sacrifice. The passage makes it fairly clear he knew what was happening, and consented to it, because he had the same faith as his father - Abraham wasn't a murderer, Isaac was willing to sacrifice himself.
-Christianity does not people not to judge, but rather, not to be hypocrites. Don't extrapolate our religion from one verse with no context. We are told to judge others several times in the New Testament.
-Making people accountable for their actions is a good thing.
-
Embed this notice
Low key I love some of the poetic ways this sentiment is expressed without a word for it.
Ezekiel 33:4 - "Then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not heed the warning and the sword comes and takes their life, their blood will be on their own head"
-
Embed this notice
Man I loved Aces Over Europe. Games used to be fun :(
Statistics
- User ID
- 116286
- Member since
- 2 May 2023
- Notices
- 74
- Daily average
- 0
chud
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the