The Orthodox have some similar issues. Truths expressed at the wrong time in the wrong way. A lot of them resent that some of the assertions in Jerusalem 1672 were made even though they think they're true. If Vatican 2 was just a "bad idea with bad outcomes, but no falsehoods" (like how many Eastern Catholics view the Church's actions in 1054) that isn't heresy, it is just imprudent. You could probably make similar claims for the Councils of Ephesus, Chalcedon and Florence, re: the behavior and language used caused issues which damaged the Church. But that doesn't make them heresy or the bishops heretics.