Notices by Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)
-
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 10-Apr-2026 11:21:55 JST 
Ash Kvetchum
🤣
Fun thread.
Have you guys ever thought about space?
:whoaaaa:
(😆) -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Apr-2026 01:43:17 JST
Ash Kvetchum
>TACO
What is this? Thank you -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 23-Mar-2026 06:36:58 JST
Ash Kvetchum
It's always Broward County lol -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Sunday, 22-Mar-2026 13:06:12 JST
Ash Kvetchum
YES, thank you
Also, clarifying: I'm saying it's sad if computer science is someone's course in their declared major--and then they leave it for such a small speedbump
Not talking about someone in general not knowing C -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Sunday, 22-Mar-2026 13:01:03 JST
Ash Kvetchum
They consider courses that teach C to be--what's the term? Shoot. Where it's the first "hard course" and people change majors after dropping the course? I forget the term.
Anyway, isn't that sad?
It's because of pointers. That's the "derailing, uh-wuh-oh, time to switch majors" line
lol 😩 -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Sunday, 22-Mar-2026 06:18:14 JST
Ash Kvetchum
You're too concerned with changing that state.
You will never be sinless.
The idea is that you're forgiven (no further action).
Our difference is in answering "Who is forgiven? How could that happen?"
Most Christians answer that by adding an additional step (whatever subset of: believe, accept, do works, confess, be a member).
Edit: The additional step then says who is forgiven and therefore who is saved (rather than what the prophets prophesied and Christ accomplished) -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Sunday, 22-Mar-2026 06:18:13 JST
Ash Kvetchum
Right!
The idea of already being forgiven =/= an invitation to do whatever. Paul writes about this.
We are called to live accordingly ("live up to it" (we could never)).
The Last Judgment/Day of the Lord *is not when it is determined whether* you are saved, but *it is when* you will be saved.
Here is where people will hesitate to agree.
Usually they resort to their specific denomination's understanding.
Friends, I have to get off for now and make dinner -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 20-Mar-2026 19:27:21 JST
Ash Kvetchum
🤣 -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 20-Mar-2026 19:27:20 JST
Ash Kvetchum
😤
I love the dwarves
Take it back 😆 -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 20-Mar-2026 12:03:21 JST
Ash Kvetchum
We all see this behavior in "Science" enjoyers, "Progressive" or "Making Great Again" enjoyers, the "Faithful" or the "Logical", etc. : Someone with overconfidence they're holding / supporting Momentum (from whatever source and will not review, only profess)
-
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Mar-2026 01:59:14 JST
Ash Kvetchum
Donald HUSSEIN Trump
(😆) -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 29-Jan-2026 11:43:24 JST
Ash Kvetchum
🍻 That's why I threw an "it" for a pronoun because I'm actually not sure which it started as -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 29-Jan-2026 08:24:43 JST
Ash Kvetchum
>fas<ist
>pro test
Good God, this fat fuck and those like it imagine they're living in the dystopian books of their fucked up childhood. They "have" to do this to "avoid censorship," posting their face and name to a chosen bop theme song openly to the public forum.
O What an Oppressed State for One to Be! O the Clever Sidestep! -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jan-2026 04:15:10 JST
Ash Kvetchum
I have silicone ones.
One looks like the One Ring--for if we're going somewhere nerdy 🤣 -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jan-2026 04:13:00 JST
Ash Kvetchum
My sister-in-law tried to shame my wife and myself right after our engagement for my having given the engagement ring. "Rings are a symbol of ownership. Where's *your* ring?!1? Where's the ring for the MAN to wear???"
She said this in insistent, smug "superiority," while on her own hand she wore a $5k ring from her obese nigger sugardaddy. -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jan-2026 04:12:59 JST
Ash Kvetchum
She was very certain she was going to be asked to be the maid-of-honor (🤣), started telling us about how excited she was to run it. (She is anti-marriage, anti-"name-changers," openly told us to not have White boys for children or if we do that they'd better be gay, and so on.)
She wasn't invited to the wedding at all.
Boomer-spirited parents wanted to have a sit-down shamefest at us for not allowing her. We had to explain to them what a degenerate their other daughter has become and how hands-off they've been about it. It was a good (entertaining) dinner in public. -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jan-2026 18:51:25 JST
Ash Kvetchum
Mm, wow, that was way back in 2025. (lol)
That's a good memory-holed point to revive (or present for the first time) to normie friends, acquaintances, and family. Good reminder. Thank you. -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jan-2026 18:34:59 JST
Ash Kvetchum
It makes me so patriotic that the US can arrest the leader of another nation in one night, but just can't seem to charge a single Epstein client--let alone name any--despite years of public demand.
-
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 01-Jan-2026 17:02:13 JST
Ash Kvetchum
Nine2five, man, we've talked about this.
I'll just start by saying there's not a standing body authority over CI, no pope or committee saying "This is our creed." Same as there isn't one of, say, Christianity. There are divisions and some divisions get behind leaders. So anyone claiming "I've talked to a CI guy and I took CI down!" is like some faithful-to-progressivism, confident Leftist talking to a random on fedi--or even to some "big follower account" somewhere--and saying they "DESTROYED (YouTube all caps) the ideas of the Far-Right!!1!"
The label "CI" is no more useful than the label "Christian." It's only a label of which beliefs are in common--not a statement that all (or even most) beliefs are in common.
Keep that in mind as you mull over things.
Alright, so.
I'm just hitting bullet points because we've talked about this.
Edomites are from Esau (Edom). Esau himself was down from Adam, and Esau took two Hittites for wives to spite Isaac and his mother. (His mother lamented that if Jacob followed suit, her life would have been pointless.) The Hittites were Canaanites. The Canaanites had mixed with Kenites. The Kenites were from Cain.
(btw The Canaanites had also mixed with the Anakim, the Rephraim, etc., who were the Nephilim. This is explicitly stated.)
Cain was not from Adam, but was of Eve.
The verse describing Cain's conception is volatile, changing more than the verses around it. "I have born a child of a lord / with the help of a lord" and its variations are among these, missing the "And Adam knew his wife" at the beginning.
(Yes, God's Word will never change. No, our recording of God's Word doesn't keep with that. Otherwise, Revelation wouldn't end with a warning about the possibility of adding or subtracting text, we wouldn't have clear examples of verses and entire passages added centuries after the NT authors wrote (even as late as the 16th c.), and we wouldn't have multiple versions on the same bookstore shelf. "The" Bible is not infallible because we who handle it are not. We turn it away from what its authors wrote--by accident at times, or with intent at others.)
The description of Eve's interaction with the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" is the same as descriptions of sexual temptation in writings just as old. The epic of Gilgamesh is an example.
Or in Proverbs of an adulterous woman.
Note that in the garden were "all the trees which God had made" and *in the midst of those* were the Tree of Life (which is God, who would "be like a Husband" to us) and the Tree of Knowledge. (Hmm? Are we talking about an actual tree still?)
Eve didn't eat from a tree. She conceived with an angel, just as happens 3 chapters later with other women (Gen 6:1), for which God floods the land of the descendants of Adam and starts again with Noah.
Alright, I'm cooking chicken now. Again, those are bulllet points of things I've already written more at length about with you specifically. I didn't even touch Malachi, Isaiah passages (ch 63, for example and its relation to the latter chapters of Revelation), the two Revelation verses I'm sure everyone on fedi knows (2:9, 3:9), and more and more. -
Embed this notice
Ash Kvetchum (ash_kvetchum@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 01-Jan-2026 12:19:21 JST
Ash Kvetchum
The intent of God for the world and your place in it is not to
>See if you're a good person because good people ('good' meaning repentant here) get to go live with me somewhere else with all the other good people who believed me
That is the selling message of churchianity.
The intent of God--if the words of his prophets and the other apostles are true and if their recordings are unchanged--is to
>Show you, whom I've chosen--regardless of whether you're faithful to what I've set for you or not and regardless of whether I am believed by you or not-- that I AM. I am the only eternal; I alone am faithful continuously; I am first and last. I will save you despite yourselves, from yourselves and from our enemies. You are of me (yet are not me). There are those who are not. You are more than those around you but just as base if you join them. I am giving you essentially monopoly money so that you may see yourselves. You are fools and will suffer them rather than be faithful (to yourselves, which is to be faithful to me), if I am not explicitly beside you. I will prove yourselves to you by your own actions--even up to the point of your whole destruction. I will save you and end them-- even then, as you failed to do. You will see. Yet I will give you something more.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the