Wow! Michelle Obama gives a speech and explains the generation wealth affirmative action system, and then JFK Jr. goes off and shows us *exactly* how that works.
Notices by Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Sunday, 25-Aug-2024 07:50:48 JST Glenn -
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 03:07:56 JST Glenn @cynblogger @Dave_Goldsmith @Urban_Hermit @Nazani @stevebenen So without looking at the rest of the thread I am guessing you are talking about Donald Trump? Am I right? 😀
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Monday, 29-Jul-2024 07:30:42 JST Glenn @GossiTheDog @eljefedsecurit You didn't give your significant other administrator privileges, did you? If they are "non-technical" that might be a mistake without giving them a bit of training.
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Monday, 29-Jul-2024 07:30:17 JST Glenn @GossiTheDog @eljefedsecurit Downloading something from a Google Search result is definitely downloading something from a "random untrusted source".
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 01:11:47 JST Glenn @heidilifeldman What the SCOTUS has done is left them room to operate in an *entirely* partisan way. If Trump or any Republican needs immunity in the future, then Presidents have immunity. If Biden or any Democrat needs immunity the partisan justices on the court have room to rule that Presidents do not have immunity. They have set things up where the SCOTUS is the arbiter of what is and isn't an official act.
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Monday, 06-May-2024 04:00:08 JST Glenn @lowqualityfacts Hmmm.. Did this actually happen? It seems like these *could* and maybe *probably* happened, but this is the Low Quality Facts feed so...
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 07:55:21 JST Glenn @jeffowski I view religion as just another form of politics with a different name - it attempts to control people's actions by making them think in a particular way. I figure, just let people think what they want.
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 04:39:49 JST Glenn @jeffowski True, so why do it? If you feel the need to proselytize atheism, you are turning into a religion.
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jan-2024 05:27:05 JST Glenn @me I am hoping you'll find time to post about your experiences self hosting.
-
Embed this notice
Glenn (glennsills@dotnet.social)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 11:29:07 JST Glenn @spaf Nah man you *say* that "1 crypto coin == 1637 tulips" but that depends on how many idiots are willing to buy tulips at the moment you want to buy something with your crypto. Sometimes the idiots get spooks and the price of tulips go way down an a crypto coin might be worth 1 million tulips.but when Musk posts something pro-tulip on x/twitter, the ratio might be 100 crypto coins = 1 tulip. So the value of a crypto coin is dependent on level of trading by idiots at any particular moment.