Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Notices by Noisytoot (noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl)

Embed this notice
Noisytoot (noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl)'s status on Tuesday, 13-May-2025 06:05:05 JST Noisytoot
- Christine Lemmer-Webber
@cwebber In what way are fediverse relays re-centralization? They're not really comparable to Bluesky relays in that they're completely optional and there's no single central relay, they're just for smaller instances to get more posts federated to them.

In conversation about a month ago from berkeley.edu.pl permalink
Embed this notice
Noisytoot (noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl)'s status on Monday, 12-May-2025 11:01:54 JST Noisytoot
in reply to
- Evan Prodromou
@evan I think the purpose was to force people to set up automation. Setting up automation is harder than just installing a certificate, but you only have to do it once instead of having to do it yearly (which you may forget). In the long run it's more convenient.

In conversation about a month ago from berkeley.edu.pl permalink
Embed this notice
Noisytoot (noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl)'s status on Tuesday, 06-May-2025 14:06:34 JST Noisytoot
in reply to
- 翠星石
- gyptazy
@Suiseiseki @gyptazy That's not an inherent property of the software. There's no reason why you couldn't use a shared blocklist on a GNU Social or Pleroma instance.

In conversation about a month ago from berkeley.edu.pl permalink

User actions

Tags

(None)

Following 0

Followers 0

Groups 0

Statistics

User ID: 344217

Member since: 6 May 2025

Notices: 3

Daily average: 0

Feeds

Atom