Notices by Ruling Otter (totalslothdeath@poa.st)

@sickburnbro However, do remember the division of the feebs they euphemistically call "Community Relations Service", which, IIRC, has been decommissioned. I'm sure they were the first on the scene to explain to her how to speak to the media.

If I'm not mistaken, at least that interference is gone. For now.

@sickburnbro @VidMasterEon I was going to add that, too, that the document itself is not what we honor. It's the principles behind it. Which means changing it to better match those principles should always be an option (but the process should be spelled out, explicitly, which in this case, it is).

There are plenty of subversives who adhere to the 'living constitution' dogma. That the most 'uh-mazing' thing about the constitution is that it can change. First, its not at all amazing, because any document can be amended with the agreement of the relevant parties. Second, amending it is not all what the living-constitution retards mean. Deliberately corrupting the existing language of it to mean something that it does not mean is what they are advocating.

@sickburnbro @VidMasterEon This is derived from the Lysander Spooner quote, "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist"

I'll say the unpopular thing. That was a retarded comment for him to make. Because it implies that no contract or anything else put in writing is fit to exist if the outcome does not line up with its intent. Everything put in writing is meaningless without moral men to ensure it happens as intended.

@sickburnbro After reading A Midwestern Doctor, I'd refuse being an organ recipient.

https://www. midwesterndoctor. com/p/do-organs-have-a-mind-of-their-own

@BowsacNoodle @retroedgetech Yup. My general POV, now, is no intervention unless I'm dying right tf now and it's preventable. If one part of my body gets separated from the rest and I'm bleeding out, I'm kinda, sorta hoping that they can stanch the bleeding and stitch me back together. And for known ~100% fatality things like rabies, I'll take my chances with Big Voodoo.

I had an intention (not a goal, as that implies some degree of flexibility that you might not meet that goal) to absolutely refuse to ever start on a med that I 'can't ever get off of' (according to them). Average 60yo in the US is on about 8 meds, 4 of them to counter adverse effects if the other 4. I'm on zero and intend on keeping it that way.

There us no such thing as a pharmaceutical deficiency. And that includes vaccines. Read up on how the universally vaccinating against measles has made it demonstrably worse for subsequent generations, for example.

In all cases I know of, natural immunity (including that passed on by the mother) is always superior. So if the mortality is low (definitely the case for measles since we got better sanitation and nutrition...with the latter deteriorating since Ancel spit Keys...but I digress). So there is a significant high bar for safety for nearly all childhood illnesses. At least in places where pooping in the street is frowned upon.

So at 61, all prophylactic vaccines are a hard no for me.

@Sui @ThatCrazyDude @Myshkin @PNS I was a sponsor for an in-law from a South American country and very vividly remember the clause about me being financially responsible for her should she become indigent. Thankfully, my blood relative is still married to her and is gainfully (self-) employed, and she's since become naturalized. I do remember her being a little irate that the naturalization forms she had to sign required she 'renounce' her citizenship of her country of origin, though. And she's barely able to speak or even understand English after 25 years. But at least she's completely inactive politically other than voting, and not mooching off of my taxes.

@WilhelmIII @TrevorGoodchild @smokescreen Effortpoast incoming.

I've always said there are conspiracy theorists who are true warriors and then there are conspiracy nuts. I long felt that 'antivaxxers' were the latter. But I've always been passively antivax. I.e.: For ~30 years I never sought them out. I just didn't see the need. The truly deadly pathogens don't spread fast enough before killing the host. The non-deadly ones? Well, I survived childhood. (Heck I had chicken pox while in a body cast. Picture that.)

About 10 years ago old gf whom I connected with on Fecesbook came down with shingles and had a horrible experience. I think she still has the peripheral neuropathy that was so painful that she contemplated shaving her head. It was excruciating to just touch her hair. (Never followed up whether she did it, but every picture I ever saw of her afterwards, she was wearing a bandanna.) She began strongly encourage all her friends to get the shingles vax.

So I researched it. And I came across some data (that I doubt, now, for reasons out of scope) that was allegedly true for all vaccines. The analysis tried to demonstrate that they are all followed by increased disease incidence for about 20 years. Then for the next 20 years, the incidence declines to the level it was 40 years ago. Only then do they decline. It just so happened that we were at the peak of that graph when I was considering it. So I declined.

Now whether or not all is true, it contributed to me dodging a bullet. From what I understand even from the vax skeptics out there, the shingles vax happens to be literally the only one that's had relatively decent testing that survives scrutiny. Nevertheless, I'm glad I declined.

Then came 2020. I bought the '15 days to flatten the curve' narrative. Until day 16. Then everything was bullshit in my mind. Including Operation Warp Speed, even before I ever heard of mRNA. 5-10 years is normal for vaccine approval. Most if not all models are shit in complex systems. There are far too many unknown unknowns to have any confidence in them. So you need real life trials. Which take time. And even if time travel ever happens (doubtful, IMO), compressing time is another matter. You cannot accelerate that, full stop.

So I was a hard no from day one. Always had been, anyhow, but had no concern because I'd been a soft no for decades, so I was just going to continue as always had. Or so I thought. And then they fucked with me. Long story short is that I got my religious accommodation, but I still (am still) rip shit fucking pissed off. I didn't want special treatment. I wanted my no to be fuck no. I never expected an inquisition.

Before the mandates, I started reading. And I never stopped. I started with Suzanne Humpries' Roman Bystranyk's Dissolving Illusions. The fraud was palpable. I don't recall whether or not the Flexner Report was covered in that, but that also clarified a lot for me. Most allopathic medicine is bullshit, IMO. But vaccines are a special kind of madness.

I began to realize that I owed antivaxxers an huge apology. They are not the ones they base their beliefs on anecdotal non-scientific evidence. The vax maxxers are. They are not even scientist in the proper sense of the word. I have the 9 hour deposition of Sidney Plotkin by Aaron Siri in 2018 in a dispute between a divorcing wife and husband where the dad wanted to vax the kid and the mom did not. Consider this paraphrase: "There is no evidence one way or another that vaccines cause autism," (much less true even just 7 years later), "so therefore I feel confident in asserting that vaccines do not cause autism." That's not just not scientific, it's utter brainwashing.

I'm attaching my 2nd favorite graph from Dissolving Illusions. It's the US death rate of measles. The UK one is slightly more stark. Pretty much every single vax (with the possible exception of polio, which is whole different, but no less worse drama). The authors, by the way, just put out quite a large tome with quotes from doctors very early on in vaccine history on the horrors they witnessed. This is not a new battle. Like today, doctors of the past experienced they're own version of canceling.

So I went from passively antivax, to anti-mRNA vax, to full-on antivax, past, present, and future. Why future? These people can't be trusted. And I don't have much faith that the field can be reformed in any lasting way. Why? It took 40 years from the time most of the medical field knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that smoking caused lung disease (cancer is disputable, but there most definitely other lung diseases than can be attributed to it) to when Big Tobacco was smacked down. So where did those PR 'professionals' go? Big Food to sell us on the idea that sugar and seed oils were healthy. That same Tobacco Playbook was in use during this whole fake plandemic.

@sickburnbro This is The Ratchet(TM), codified. And if it is allowed to continue...it won't be long before it is not able to continue. What can't continue, won't.