Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
The Kennedy thing is wild, by fighting for RFKjr the Kennedy legacy has been taken from the democrats. And for what? because RFKjr was anti-vaxx.
-
Embed this notice
@threalist a good question, I say this because the regime painted anyone who had reservations as "anti-vaxx"
He has said that black people should be put on a different vaccination schedule due to their race, so he's not "anti-vaccination" but skeptical.
-
Embed this notice
Is he actually "anti-vax" or does he just want to be able to ask some questions?
(I haven't followed his positions closely)
-
Embed this notice
@dictatordave @threalist it's dumb because the schools mandate it, but then say they aren't responsible, they are just following recommendations, and then the doctors say they aren't responsible, and are just issuing "recommendations"
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro @threalist i think rand put it the best
we just want choices, we want to be able to say hey my kid doesn't need two hep b shots at 1 year old, he isn't going to be shooting dope and banging hookers, paraphrasing.
but right now schools, not doctors, are the ones who can mandate this shit, and its all hinged around diseases that are either brought in by foreigners or spread by degenerates, so why does my kid need products with heavy metals from companies that have no liability?
also its hilarious that these companies can claim their products are safe with no proof, that'd be like a car maker saying their shit is safe but the thing crumples when you lean on it
its just societal mental illness that we're laboring under
-
Embed this notice
The amount of things they want to inject babies with is crazy.
-
Embed this notice
@BasedLord @sickburnbro @threalist its malpractice, all of it
they can claim immunity or just following recommendations but it doesn't mean they shouldn't swing, along with their families
there's zero consequences for these 'professionals' that for some stupid reason the idiot public simply trusts
-
Embed this notice
@dictatordave @BasedLord @threalist The interesting thing is that while things were going well enough, people were OK to let these groups not take responsibility, but things are not well enough anymore.
-
Embed this notice
I was in the hospital with my mom in 2/2020 heard them reading a memo out loud. CDC recommended things. By April no appointments or anything. By the time reached 8/2020 full lockdown with that memo recommendation I heard read. Knew something big about to happen. Then 2021 Biden banging on the Podium.
-
Embed this notice
@DMA @dictatordave @threalist Yeah, they are going to regret saying they hoped everyone would die.
-
Embed this notice
@ChadleyDudebro he seems to be the 90s democrat style which is essentially "we need it for rape and stuff like that"
At this point, removing a federal "right" to abortion and letting states decide is the most effective option.
-
Embed this notice
Still pro abortion last I checked.
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro @threalist His position, from what I can tell, is actually a pretty sneaky one. Sneaky in the sense that it gets him through the gatekeepers (mostly), but probably gets the antivaxxers (including me) what we want. They vigorously attack him knowing damn well that he has never once said he is against vaccines, but are deathly afraid of opening the books. It's that usual government supremacist attitude that kicks in. Don't you dare expose to the world how untrustworthy we are, because then you will destroy trust in government. No shit, Sherlock, but trust is earned, and if you have been untrustworthy, you don't deserve trust. It's in actual government records that are public (which I can probably dig up if anyone is interested), from the 1970s, that no opinion against vaccines must be allowed to propagate, *even if true*.
He has repeatedly said he is not antivaxx, but that he just wants 'safe' vaccines. He said he fought to get mercury out of fish (which I think he considers a lost cause, now), but no-one ever called him anti-fish. But he's also hinted that he doesn't think any vaccines can be made safe. So by demanding transparency and actual studies using actual placebos (rather than deceptively using other vaccines, or a shot with all the same adjuvants and other ingredients, but no antigen), and demonstrating the dangers conclusively, the crap will be taken off the market. He knows damn well that honest research will kill trust in vaccines, at least as concocted in the past 150+ years, as well it should.
Vaccine R&D and continued release of new shots won't be prohibited, but once the public gets a taste of what's been done to us, much like the USAID revelations, they'll demand more actual testing and transparency. It's a Pandora's Box that can't be closed.
There are a lot of idiots in the 'health freedom' moment that I've stopped paying attention to because they think this admin, including RFK, Jr. has pivioted. It might be true, but they are making assertions without understanding anything about strategy. I don't think there's been a pivot at all. Anti-Big Fooders and Anti-Vaxxers at each others throats, so-to-speak, when they don't need to be. Look at Trump's EO on MAHA put out yesterday and it doesn't say a word about vaccines. If it did, it might kill the movement in its crib. But it's rife with comments like 'transparency' and 'bring honest science back', etc. Again. Get it by the gatekeepers, but get to the destination you want.
-
Embed this notice
@totalslothdeath @threalist I think the biggest thing is he has an older style view of the government in that he thinks HHS should protect the citizens from big businesses, such that he is willing to take a skeptical view of what big pharma has done.
Bread up, Bro
🌲-alist
dictatordave
????? ??ℝ? ™
DMA
ChadleyDudebro
Ruling Otter
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the