Notices by Stefano Maffulli (ed@social.opensource.org)

@lxo I still can't see why that'd be considered a violation of the OSD and not a license violation... I wasn't at the OSI at the time, I was on the FSFE board (or about to join it, I don't remember the exact dates). Worth discussing it over beers :)

@lxo I'm confused. Are you talking about GPL violations according to the interpretation of the FSF?

@lxo "a couple of years before OSI was founded", you wrote?

The licenses of Llama and Deepseek contain clear violations of the Open Source Definition, these things are *not* Open Source at a more fundamental level.

The new Open Source AI Definition doesn't even kick in.

So much noise and disinformation.

@dalias it's a shame that a company is called Open something and has nothing to do with that name.

@dalias The post is about this conference https://allthingsopen.ai/

The famous All Things Open conference, with a special event dedicated to "AI"... really nothing to do with the the company you're thinking about.

@dalias what are you talking about?

All Things Open AI https://opensource.org/events/all-things-open-ai #OpenSource

@jwildeboer one of the best versions in English https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSpqj3V0s2E

The goal is to present a stable version of the definition in October at the All Things Open event in Raleigh, North Carolina. https://opensource.org/blog/the-open-source-ai-definition-gets-closer-to-reality-with-a-global-workshop-series #OpenSource

@luis_in_brief @HeatherLeson the wiki is still up, untouched 😉

@ariadne I think this is one of the rare cases where it's worth calling a spade a spade. Mr. Hashimoto not only burned bridges and ships but he's trying to set on fire the house we all live in, damaging the whole ecosystem. We have no way to reconcile our positions.

The Open Source community is not trying to get all of #OpenSource out of #CRA's scope, but they do want the development of open source software in the open to be excluded https://blog.opensource.org/diverse-open-source-uses-highlight-need-for-precision-in-cyber-resilience-act/

@ariadne I'm starting to think you're biased 😉 go ask around to any researcher in AI, they'll say that the original training data is not strictly necessary.
@kfogel

The US Senate subcommittee on Privacy Technology and Law asked Meta questions about their “leaked” #AI model LLaMa.

Forget for a moment that this is Meta: I fear that if these questions were asked to any #OpenSource developer we’d all be shaking in fear for the whole ecosystem.

https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06062023metallamamodelleakletter.pdf

@ajsadauskas @pfefferle https://blog.opensource.org has it installed :) with a bunch of #IndieWeb plugins too