>"jews are super powerful and create millennial schemes but we can totally usurp them if we just abandon the one strategy that disempowered them successful for 1700 years!" My brothers in Christ, do not be deceived by this foolish shabbos. He does the work of the synagogue of Satan whether he knows it or not.
@BowsacNoodle@HyperboreanWave >Ignores how much power Vatican Rome had throughout the middle ages. This level of ignorance can only be ascribed to evil.
@MeBigbrain@HyperboreanWave He popped up today to spread his goofy lies. I'll work with "pagans" for our shared goal of benefitting White people, but some people need shoved in a locker.
@BowsacNoodle@HyperboreanWave It's as if the Enemy himself dropped him in with a list of the exact same defeated arguments to shoot with purely as some wicked distraction.
I'm glad I don't see it so often anymore but when I do see it I get a very violent feeling.
@MartianM00n@HyperboreanWave It is somewhat sad because I want to hone my arguments against people who disagree, but I don't want to start fights with randos. Unironically get good and argue better.
@BowsacNoodle Jews are not super powerful in and of themselves, I've defeated their schemes when it comes to me, the problem is our race is filled with retards such as yourself who buy into their power systems. And no, christianity IS WHAT ALLOWED THE JEWS TO TAKE OVER it's not what kept the jews out of power. Did jews take over and use to wage global White genocide mega christcucked America or pagan Rome?
@HyperboreanWave >I've defeated their schemes when it comes to me Do tell. I'm interested. >retards such as yourself who buy into their power systems. They usurped our power systems, or are you implying they invented them? >And no, christianity IS WHAT ALLOWED THE JEWS TO TAKE OVER it's not what kept the jews out of power. Chrysostom advised people to have no dealings with these people because their duplicitous nature would hoodwink them. This was a common understanding. The peasant or equivalent man who seldom traveled more than 10 miles from his birthplace lived in a world where reputation had consequences, but news traveled slow. Naturally this meant pragmatic approaches would be adopted: beware the jew and make no dealings with him. It was only during proto mercantilist Europe that the nomadic merchant class finally got their tendrils into Christian society. Read a Brief History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of mankind, and you'll see the history laid out: >Kingdom rich in land but not enough money for sufficient trained mercenary army. "Shalom friend, I can offer you gold my king. Oh if only I could live and work honestly in peace! BTW why I don't I just help you with the whole treasury thing and manage all of it? It would be my pleasure, and it's the least I can do to repay your kindness for giving a merchant like me a place to call home!" Eventually expelled and repeated elsewhere. Desperation drove people to make deals with evil.
@MartianM00n@BowsacNoodle How is the chritstcuck institution of the Vatican, which was used to undermine the White race (see the pope telling world governments to criminalize anti-semitism), a refutation of what I'm saying? Christian institutions always played into jewish power, pagan Rome literally genocided and expelled all the jews from their homeland because they got uppity a couple of times.
@HyperboreanWave@mphjack7@MartianM00n >Sicut Judaeis The Pope reminded people not to take justice into their own hands and behave towards everyone in a just way— even the jews. That is not the same as stopping righteous massacre. Criminals were still punished. Existence as a jew was not criminalized at that time.
@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n The pagan Romans weren't worshipping jews, and when jews acted out they were massacred. The catholic church literally did everything it could to stop European peasants from righteously massacring jews in response to jewish abuse.
@HyperboreanWave@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n The (pagan) Romans already had a policy of giving Judaism legal exemptions well before Christianity, and there was already a Jewish diaspora across the empire in the first century. In regards to the Jews, the Christians didn't do all that much more than what the pagans were already doing.
@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n >the cow has a perfectly nice life in the slaughterhouse until it gets its head chopped off We are living in the final stages of the christianization of the White race
@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n >a farm animal has a great life before slaughter, whereas it would likely die before adulthood in the wild from predation. Weak argument because I don't consider myself cattle, but nice to know you're either self-loathing or a jew yourself. Furthermore, the same argument, which I completed for you, is a perfectly valid reason to support animal husbandry and the consumption of meat.
@BowsacNoodle@mphjack7@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n >Existence as a jew was not criminalized at that time the vizigoths mostly did though, i dont think anyone could say vizigoths were subverted were subverted with how harsh and through they were, and seeing as how the jews let the saracens in
@HyperboreanWave >>Chrysostom advised people to have no dealings with these people >All christians worship jews, so no, this is false.
John Chrysostom, Against the Jews. >Homily 1, section VI, pt 4 >(4) So the godlessness of the Jews and the pagans is on a par. But the Jews practice a deceit which is more dangerous. In their synagogue stands an invisible altar of deceit on which they sacrifice not sheep and calves but the souls of men.
This is one of six lectures on the subject and is over 8,500 words long. I quickly skimmed and found multiple quote worthy sections.
@BowsacNoodle >Do tell. I'm interested. I'm not doing anything voluntarily to aid the jews, if every White person believed what I believe the jews would be out of power >They usurped our power systems, or are you implying they invented them? Christianity was jews doing that, I don't know what the distinction between usurping/inventing them because this has been a multi millennia effort >Chrysostom advised people to have no dealings with these people All christians worship jews, so no, this is false.
@HyperboreanWave I'll assume you aren't familiar with Chrysostom, but he was a huge deal. He was a Bishop in charge of a large area and set a ton of policy and church structure still in use today.
@BowsacNoodle There's shouldn't be jews in White lands. Telling people on an individual level to not have dealings with them means nothing. What christian institutions objectively did was prevent Europeans who were harmed by jews from righteously killing them.
@BowsacNoodle Do you think jews should be allowed to live in White countries? If yes, then you are supportive of what has allowed them to take over our countries, and is now resulting in them genociding our race. If no, then you should hate christianity as do I for protecting them.
@HyperboreanWave I don't hate Christianity and never will. Christianity does not support wanton killing of people. One can remove someone without physically killing them.
@HyperboreanWave I condemn killing for its own sake. I believe in just war. I believe in self determination of peoples and nations. I believe in laws, rules, morals, and ethics, and I believe these should be derived from natural law given to us by God. Killing people for pre crime is unironically jewish behavior. Expulsion and disempowerment is sufficient when carried out properly.
@BowsacNoodle Christian institutions didn't physically remove jews, all they did was stop them from being killed, so they are complicit in the jewish takeover. Jews should be killed for being jews, and these were peasants killing them for that and more, so the fact that you condemn it means you support jews, so you deserve to be killed.
If that is your opinion, then you should be equally as angry at paganism as you are at Christianity, because (as shown earlier) Christianity did little more in regards to the Jews than what paganism was already doing well before.
@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n No, pagan Rome slaughtered jews and chased them out of their highest concentration within the empire, and would have over time wherever they settled if christcucks didn't destroy it.
@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n I don't give a shit what jews do in their synagogues. Christianity stopped Whites from righteously killing jews, and it's why we are being wiped out by them today.
"Sicut Judaeis," or at least the version issued by Gregory I, declared that "license ought not to be presumed for the Jews to do anything in their synagogues beyond what is permitted by law." Wow, the policies of "Sicut Judaeis" sound an awful lot like the policies that pagan Rome had in dealing with the Jews!
@HyperboreanWave@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n >"No, pagan Rome slaughtered jews and chased them out of their highest concentration within the empire" When you say "pagan Rome," you're mostly talking about Hadrian and Titus, who were exceptions (as they were putting down massive Jewish revolts), not the rule for pagan Rome.
>"and would have over time wherever they settled if christcucks didn't destroy it." Except after Hadrian, Rome didn't attempt to wipe out the Jewish diaspora at all. On the contrary, Decius and Diocletian exempted them from persecution, and Julian (last pagan emperor) literally tried to give them a new temple in Jerusalem. It's not like Rome was in the middle of exterminating the Jews moments before Constantine or Theodosius. In fact, the only post-Hadrian emperor who did anything to get rid of the Jews was Heraclius (a Christian), even though his method was forced conversions rather than outright killing.
@HyperboreanWave@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n >"Do you see the fundamental difference? In Europe when christianity was dominant the institutions worked to protect the jews from European slaughtering them, but when paganism was dominant the institutions THEMSELVES slaughtered the jews." As I showed previously, the Christian "protections" of Jews ("Sicut Judaeis") had a caveat to it, that the Jews were only to be protected if they followed the law; if they did not, they were punished accordingly. Which was the PAGAN ROMAN policy TOO. The reason why Hadrian (pagan) massacred the Jews was because they openly waged war against the Roman state. That is also why Heraclius (Christian) massacred the Jews.
>"THAT'S THE PROBLEM, BEING A JEW IS THE CRIME. But of course a christcuck CAN'T say that..." The pagans in Rome ALSO did not say that "being a Jew is the crime." Not only that, but the Jews were protected by law under paganism. They were made exempt from the laws dictating that they had to follow pagan religion. Pagan institutions protected the Jews from being wiped out, by law, unless the Jews openly revolted. Such was also the Christian policy. Hence why, when the Jews revolted against the Christian emperor Heraclus, he did (ALMOST) THE SAME THING that Hadrian did to the Jews previously (see pic related).
>"I and every pagan has no ideological problem with not only the death of every jew today but every jew throughout history" 1) Oh, we got a badass here; this guy wishes death on people who lived 2000+ years ago! 2) Not sure if "every pagan" in the past had "no ideological problem" with total Jew death, as Decius, Diocletian, and Julian cared enough about Jews to purposefully avoid killing them.
@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n Pagan Rome destroyed the highest concentration of jews within the empire, and at that point the diaspora was nowhere near as bad anywhere else. If christinialization had not occured then when jews would eventually become a problem somewhere there would have been a similar response, where as christian Europe explicitly PREVENTED Europeans from massacring jews. I didn't say Pagan Rome had it all figured out, but they had a precedent where the highest institutions of Roman society massacred jews in response to outrageous jewish behavior, where as christian European institutions PREVENTED jewish massacres. Do you see the fundamental difference? In Europe when christianity was dominant the institutions worked to protect the jews from European slaughtering them, but when paganism was dominant the institutions THEMSELVES slaughtered the jews. See the above christcuck, he is ideologically against slaughtering jews because "muh what if some innocent jew didn't commit a crime". THAT'S THE PROBLEM, BEING A JEW IS THE CRIME. But of course a christcuck CAN'T say that, because all the people you WORSHIP were jews, so you have to always give them muh chance to convert. I and every pagan has no ideological problem with not only the death of every jew today but every jew throughout history, but can a christcuck? Can a christcuck say they want king David, Moses, the Apostles and JESUS to have been killed? No, of course not, these are the people you most revere and worship, and so christians have always naturally played for the other team, for jewish rather than European power, it's why jews rule over us today. I'm not saying we should kill all White christians, sadly they are members of our race who have been tricked by the jews, but treat every christian as a would-be traitor.
@HyperboreanWave@mphjack7@MartianM00n He's responding directly to your claims. And since you're bringing fallacies into the conversation, sweeping generalization says what? You paint this broad brush about how all pagans would have massacred jews, and when three examples are uncovered, plus another I linked in a quote post, you call it nitpicking. We also have the known issue of modern scholarship coloring the views of past peoples, because cultural relativism in archaeology stops when anti-semitism is involved. This is a critique of modern universities and Wikipedia rather than your arguments, but it remains valid.
@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n You're not actually responding to what I'm posting so further discussion is pointless. I applaud you for not engaging in ad homs like your fellow christians but you're engaged in a dishonest form of argumentation where you're nitpicking rather than engaging in the ideas. E.g. I read the part on Heraclius and while he was indeed based the ARTICLE ITSELF, right below the passage that you quoted, mentions how his actions went against christian doctrine on the jews. This was an ERE emperor doing this in the 7th century, so clearly he was not too far removed from pagan Roman virtues, which christianity worked tirelessly to erode and give our countries over to the jews. You must have seen this passage, but dishonestly chose to not include it in your argument in order to create a false image of Heraclius and his actions.
@BowsacNoodle@mphjack7@MartianM00n No he's not, he's making a dishonest argument, see above. I would be for a genuine discussion where we go line by line between our arguments and try to get to the truth of the matter, but I'm not going to be putting in the effort when my interlocuter is just being dishonest. I have no idea where you are getting "all pagans would have massacred jews", you likewise are misrepresenting what my argument is.
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n >expel them from Judea when they were defying his rule >peasants wanted to slaughter the jews when they were living around Ruler acting like a ruler in both cases and stopping misbehaving denizens >Expel when defying (rebellion) >Slaughter for living near Do you see the difference, and the similarities? Rome tells the jews "Don't act like a savage" and used necessary force to stop it when they did. Rome tells the peasants "don't act like a savage" when they wanted to kill other people as a mob.
@gav@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n Nah, when it came to Rome you had institutions like the Emperor deciding to slaughter and expel them from Judea when they were defying his rule. Illiterate European peasants likewise wanted to slaughter the jews when they were living around them, but the church stopped them. It seems both the European masses and non-christian institutions could fight jewish power, but christianization stopped that.
@HyperboreanWave@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n >the premise that the non offending jew shouldn't be harmed pre christian romans did it to just like post christians do it now white people are too autistically kind and cosmopolitanism is rot, need way more xenophobia of you gonna be like that
@gav@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n I don't want to construct some rube goldberg system where the jews get to stay in our society as long as they behave, it's either assimilate (at least that would be in the initial offer made, they've already rejected it at this point) or die/gtfo. Either make the jew one of us or get them out of our society, TOLERATING these people on the premise that the non offending jew shouldn't be harmed is wrong and is a fundamentally christian notion, since they revere jews and want them to adopt christianity. They've gamed that desire, and the modern hellscape where they completely rule over us is the result.
@gav@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n That shit sounds unenforceable, who is policing whether the jews are dividing their food or not? This was not better than simply expelling or killing all the jews, as evidenced by the jews later helping Iberia get conquered by Arabs. Theoretically I am not against assimilation, but the assimilation christians tried to do of the jews simply didn't work. Romans tried to assimilate them but because they were actively imposing Roman culture on the jews that got the jews to chimp out, and the Romans got to righteously slaughter and expel them in turn.
@HyperboreanWave@BowsacNoodle@MartianM00n@mphjack7https://archive.org/details/cu31924072483419/page/363/mode/1up relavent sections begins page 363 please delight in this kvetching footnot on page 364 "‘This pleasing homily, which precedes a collection of the most atrocious laws ever devised for the suppression of human thought and the persecution of heretics—with the sole exception of the rules of the Inquisition, of which it is the prototype—is extremely edifying. The confidence and assurance of a heavenly recompense, expressed by the pious king in whose name this edict was promulgated, reveals the degrading superstition of the time, and the absolute domination of the monarch by his spiritual advisers.—[ED."
" Nor shall any Jew, in honor of his ancient, erroneous belief, observe any festival days, great or small; or attempt their observance; or desist from labor upon any holidays; or hereafter keep the Sabbath, or any other sacred days prescribed by his rites, or attempt to do so. Anyone detected violating this law shall be liable to the condemnation and penalty prescribed for the same"
in refrence to that maim which i will not quote to relieve passing readers of the foul image "Whoever is proved to have voluntarily performed, or submitted to it, shall be punished with the utmost severity of the law." an apparent contrast to all supposed virtuos subjectors i dont believe even hitler outlawed it so i prefer the visigoths
"VIII. Jews shall not Divide their Food into Clean and Unclean, According to their Custom."
"IX. No Jew shall Subject a Christian to Torture.
We especially decree, by the following law, that it shall not be lawful for any Jew to testify against a Christian in any legal proceeding, or business transaction, even though said Christian should be of the lowest rank or a slave; nor shall a Jew prosecute a Christian, in any action at law; or sue him upon any written contract; or subject him to torture for any reason whatever. For it seems sacrilegious to prefer an infidel to him who is a believer, and to subject the members of the followers of Christ to torture inflicted by his adversaries. If, however, Jews should have causes of action among themselves, they shall have the right, under the law, to testify against each other; and to put their slaves to the torture in the presence of Christian judges."
"Jews, whether baptized or unbaptized, are therefore forbidden to testify against Christians. The descendants of Jews, however, if they are of good morals, and adherents of the Faith, shall be permitted to give evidence among Christians; but not unless their morals and their belief shall be vouched for by either the king, a priest or a judge."
"and it is hereby decreed that whoever attempts to commit any of the crimes prohibited by former laws, or contained in any amendments to the same, or presumes to act in defiance of said laws, shall be either stoned to death, or burned by such of his own countrymen as may have entered into an agreement to do so. However, if the king, in his mercy, should decide to spare the life of such a criminal, he shall be delivered up as a slave to whomever the king may select, and all his property shall be given to others; and this shall be done in such a way that the culprit can never come into possession of his property again, or recover his liberty in the future."
"XV. All Christians are Forbidden to Defend or Protect a Jew, by Either Force or Favor."
i am unable to find the section the following quote refers to but as 7 is the age children traditionally begin apprenticeship so it is believable, it is likely in another less constitutional law as this lawcode leaves the king almost entirely free to do anything, however he does eloquently preach about whomever ceasing to up hold that law being the anti christ "The persons upon whom the King bestowed the enslaved Jews would have to sign an undertaking never to allow them to practise their rites. Finally, their children would be taken from them when they reached the age of 7 years and would be handed over to devout Christians to be brought up and in due course married off to Christians."
@gav@BowsacNoodle@mphjack7@MartianM00n >existence as a jew was criminalized >the jews managed to let the Saracens conquer Iberia This is a contradiction
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n >Killing jews as a mob is a good thing, the ruler is in the wrong in stopping that. I guess all the Roman leaders were wrong. Killing people for the crime of existing is a debasing act which sets bad precedent for a people. It's unironically what jews have done and manipulated people into thinking it's what White people do. >You are a pseudo jew You are a LARPagan, so naturally you make things up wholecloth to annoy functional human beings and insult 2,000 years of Europeans and our history in the process.
I am for justice. I am not for mob violence. Call it semantics, but there's a spiritual difference by multiple meanings of the word.
@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n Killing jews as a mob is a good thing, the ruler is in the wrong in stopping that. You are a pseudo jew so naturally see the killing of jews, who are genociding our race, as a bad thing. You should be killed along with them. But forreal, what is the justification of why it's wrong for Europeans to kill racial enemies? Only christcuck nonsense, which is why it should be rejected.
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n And just to be clear— I do not care for jews. If I could personally give the order to send all of them to Madagascar, I would sign that paper so fast it'd catch fire. They can go first class on our tax dollars for all I care— it would be cheaper than what it costs to maintain their grift schemes and theft off American tax dollars.
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n How many White children do you have? I'm well above replacement level. My ancestors are smiling upon me, can you say the same?
@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n Yes all Roman leaders who stopped peasants from killing jews were wrong. There's nothing wrong with democratic violence against subversives, you are against that because you are a pseudo jew and know you would likewise be killed. I do not insult European history I insult jewmericans and other filth like you. You people are going extinct and will all fuck niggers, enjoy that being the fruits of christian civilizaiton. I am for killing all anti-White scum such as yourself, that's justice.
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n Weird that you'd wish a "fellow White" be miscegenated out of existence. I guess the LARPagan false dichotomy of "race or religion" was always about projection, wasn't it? Nice to know you're also childless. Work on that before you try to correct functional adults. Get your damn house in order.
@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n I am Russian, my people are the only Whites who don't have infinity niggers headed into their country. Enjoy each of your descendants getting fucked by niggers out of the White race.
@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n You betrayed the White race, you are anti-White, and so yes I celebrate you being wiped out or at least becoming niggerfied. You chose christianity over your race and now you are going extinct, this is the natural order of things. Bye bye, good riddance to rubbish. I'd say the tragedy is Europe getting afflicted with this filthy, since Europe wasn't filled with Christian retards like jewmerica. That's the only bad part of this, jewmerican jew worshipping race traitors getting wiped out is a good thing. The only good White person from jewmerica is one who wholeheartedly hates the monstrosity that is jewmerica, a core part of which is christian fanaticism, but you're clearly not that.
@HyperboreanWave@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n >Betraying the White Race by having children and being a positive influence on my family, friends, and community while following the same religion as at least 500 years of my ancestors. I'm glad you don't approve of me if you think that's "betrayal". Your approval would be a sign of low quality.
@H_A_Copington@matty@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n I'm not pagan I'm agnostic, I practice it every day by not believing in any fairytales. If dumb people need fairytales as a centerpiece of a community that's fine, those fairytales should then be ones Europeans made and which promote things that are good for us, not ones made by jews that weaken our race.
@matty@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n He's a "pagan" that posts nothing about pagan practice, faith, or theology, but will endlessly post about how much he hates other White people. Man needs to get off the internet and pour a libation to the god of not being a retard on the internet (probably Wotan if I'm getting my theology correct)
@King_Noticer@BowsacNoodle@gav@mphjack7@MartianM00n I cheer for the survival and thriving of the White race. Jewmerican jew worshippers are agents of jews in the destruction of the White race worldwide so you deserve to be wiped out.
If the universe's existence is no different than my "fictional god" then why the fuck is it stupid to believe in my God when you just admitted that the chances of Him existing is the same as the universe existing you stupid fucking nigger
@matty@gav@mphjack7@BowsacNoodle@H_A_Copington@MartianM00n Are you referring to the universe? There's no reason why the universe's existence would be any different from your fictional god, and that shit happened billions of years ago and will never be knowable by us so it's irrelevant.
Bro, you don't know what the word "proof" means. I can prove many things, including my own existence, but losers like you won't accept the evidence. Go read Aquinas, even in translation, and get back to me.
Come on now. You know God commanded them to kill every Canaanite. jews arent "people" such as you are. HBW is a fucking moron, but a broken clock is right twice a day and all.
@Xenophon@gav@mphjack7@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n >These people are annoying and want them dead even though there's been no trial or command from authority. ≠ >God, the supreme authority who is physically manifesting in pillar of fire and provides miracle food 6+1 days of the wee, said to kill all these people. The difference is authority. Even if you take out supernatural, it's still authority from their high priest who functioned as a ruler at that time.
@Xenophon@gav@mphjack7@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n >all attempts to "save the White race" are futile and a waste of effort. What? Was this supposed to have "by ending these people" or some equivalent on the end?
they are the same people. One day I hope you see that. That said, the glory of their destruction is Gods, because the prophets said so, so all attempts to "save the White race" are futile and a waste of effort.
No, I wrote it how I wanted it. The end of Revelation is the story of the failure of Israel and their rescue by Yahweh. The end of this age, that leads into the beginning of the next one. It's also written other places, but we don't need to quote them all.
Point is, no matter what you may think "Israel" means, if it's our race, or your church, or any generic body of believers, the story is clear. We descend towards destruction with no path to salvation on our own. We collapse, and only after that does God come to our rescue. So no, there is no way we can make anything better, if indeed we are near the end. And frankly even if we aren't, there's little to no hope anyway because we have ample evidence of nations collapsing, but We are the 5th kingdom, so It's probably close to the end whether it's 5 years or 150.
@Xenophon@gav@mphjack7@HyperboreanWave@MartianM00n I don't. I just don't see it as "there's no saving the White race". It's entirely possible that in my lifetime the world ends, but something like a random solar flare or meteor could set things back a few decades or longer with how interconnected the economy and supply chains are, possibly starting a... Little Dark Age.
If you think the bible is a black pill I guess. I think it's a big White pill, because He saves us. The point is to understand His glory and power. He told us not to touch the stove and we didn't listen, so now He will save us from the 3rd degree burns inflicted on our entire body.
It would seem very clear to just about anyone that the reason the West has been declining for the last 60 years IS BECAUSE of paganism. That's right around the time of people turning their backs on the Church and moving towards the poisoned well of Feminism, which made way for open drug use, birth control, Summer of Love style sex, abortion, gay marriage, porn, LGBTQ, gender dysphoria, pronoun totalitarianism, gender chop-shop, accepting immigration as a weapon and sex with kids. All of these are the exact opposite of Christianity, all of them are pagan and all of them were pushed into our world by jews. The last thing in the world that jews would ever push is Christianity. To think otherwise is to show ignorance. Do you really think that if we had a strong Christian culture right now that any of this would be happening?