Notices by MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)
-
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 12-Sep-2024 05:08:05 JST 
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
I like to browse explicitly-biased wikis, and I noticed a pattern in the way they discuss politicians they dislike. To illustrate:
RATIONALWIKI: "John Doe is a centre-right corrupt politician and climate change denialist from Country. In 2022, Doe made headlines for taking bribes from oil companies, which explains his climate denialism. Despite said crank opinions, he is pro-vaccine."
METAPEDIA: "John Doe is a politician from Country and a member of the Political Party. He is a Zionist and has facilitated the demographic replacement of white people via mass immigration. Doe is also a long-time member of the World Economic Forum."
PROLEWIKI: "John Doe is a right-wing neoliberal politician, former police officer, and member of the Political Party of Country. Even though he claims to be a human rights advocate, Doe is a vocal supporter of American imperialism and the genocide in Gaza."
CONSERVAPEDIA: "John Doe is a totalitarian kleptocratic globalist politician from Country and a member of the neoconservative Political Party. He was instrumental in implementing tyrannical COVID lockdowns that enslaved Country's people. He is a Russophobe who endorses the Neo-Nazi Maidan regime and the NATO war in Ukraine. John Doe also has strong ties with the World Economic Forum and the People's Republic of China. Despite his support for globalist tyranny, he has criticized climate alarmism in the past." -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Monday, 15-Jul-2024 00:42:15 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@MMA lol -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 13-Jun-2024 17:17:20 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@clacke @ainmosni @mansr
Because original sin is something you are afflicted with and can be forgiven of. The same isn't true of Privilege. -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 10:29:27 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@HyperboreanWave @BowsacNoodle @MartianM00n
>"Do you see the fundamental difference? In Europe when christianity was dominant the institutions worked to protect the jews from European slaughtering them, but when paganism was dominant the institutions THEMSELVES slaughtered the jews."
As I showed previously, the Christian "protections" of Jews ("Sicut Judaeis") had a caveat to it, that the Jews were only to be protected if they followed the law; if they did not, they were punished accordingly. Which was the PAGAN ROMAN policy TOO.
The reason why Hadrian (pagan) massacred the Jews was because they openly waged war against the Roman state. That is also why Heraclius (Christian) massacred the Jews.
>"THAT'S THE PROBLEM, BEING A JEW IS THE CRIME. But of course a christcuck CAN'T say that..."
The pagans in Rome ALSO did not say that "being a Jew is the crime." Not only that, but the Jews were protected by law under paganism. They were made exempt from the laws dictating that they had to follow pagan religion. Pagan institutions protected the Jews from being wiped out, by law, unless the Jews openly revolted. Such was also the Christian policy.
Hence why, when the Jews revolted against the Christian emperor Heraclus, he did (ALMOST) THE SAME THING that Hadrian did to the Jews previously (see pic related).
>"I and every pagan has no ideological problem with not only the death of every jew today but every jew throughout history"
1) Oh, we got a badass here; this guy wishes death on people who lived 2000+ years ago!
2) Not sure if "every pagan" in the past had "no ideological problem" with total Jew death, as Decius, Diocletian, and Julian cared enough about Jews to purposefully avoid killing them. -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 06:52:33 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@HyperboreanWave @BowsacNoodle @MartianM00n
>"No, pagan Rome slaughtered jews and chased them out of their highest concentration within the empire"
When you say "pagan Rome," you're mostly talking about Hadrian and Titus, who were exceptions (as they were putting down massive Jewish revolts), not the rule for pagan Rome.
>"and would have over time wherever they settled if christcucks didn't destroy it."
Except after Hadrian, Rome didn't attempt to wipe out the Jewish diaspora at all. On the contrary, Decius and Diocletian exempted them from persecution, and Julian (last pagan emperor) literally tried to give them a new temple in Jerusalem. It's not like Rome was in the middle of exterminating the Jews moments before Constantine or Theodosius.
In fact, the only post-Hadrian emperor who did anything to get rid of the Jews was Heraclius (a Christian), even though his method was forced conversions rather than outright killing. -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 04:46:57 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@HyperboreanWave @BowsacNoodle @MartianM00n
"Sicut Judaeis," or at least the version issued by Gregory I, declared that "license ought not to be presumed for the Jews to do anything in their synagogues beyond what is permitted by law."
Wow, the policies of "Sicut Judaeis" sound an awful lot like the policies that pagan Rome had in dealing with the Jews! -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 04:46:55 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@HyperboreanWave @BowsacNoodle @MartianM00n
>"Christianity stopped Whites from righteously killing jews, and it's why we are being wiped out by them today."
If that is your opinion, then you should be equally as angry at paganism as you are at Christianity, because (as shown earlier) Christianity did little more in regards to the Jews than what paganism was already doing well before. -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 01:35:50 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@HyperboreanWave @BowsacNoodle @MartianM00n
The (pagan) Romans already had a policy of giving Judaism legal exemptions well before Christianity, and there was already a Jewish diaspora across the empire in the first century. In regards to the Jews, the Christians didn't do all that much more than what the pagans were already doing. -
Embed this notice
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1: (mphjack7@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 30-Nov-2023 09:10:04 JST
MPH Jack ๐ :cross_celtic_blue1:
@BowsacNoodle
I'm baffled by the Satanic Temple's continued existance. Imagine building your entire religious worldview specifically in opposition to Christianity. Somehow a "religion" with so little substance is able to do big public stunts like this. It's pathetic to a degree that would be funny if it wasn't so horrid.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the