Getting pretty clear that if you want to start a blog or anything like that, #Wordpress is *not* the place to be. And it's not just the recent drama.
I tested it last spring. The whole experience feels grubby and nickel-and-dimey. It's made for people trying to make money, by people trying to get a cut. That's fine, but it's not for me.
So what better alternatives are there? Host a static blog on GitHub pages?
The #Nankai#Rapi:d #train from #Osaka to Kansai Airport is possibly my favourite train in Japan.
Not just because of its design; but also because this is the train we'd always take when going to the airport and abroad. Boarding this train is, to me, always the start of an adventure.
@mrundkvist The punishment is lack of external funding. But if the department doesn't rely at all on funding agencies for their operating income then that's not effective of course.
In the sciences external funding is important enough that a history of consistently getting external funds counts higher than even your publications.
@mrundkvist Yes, there are dysfunctional places around. I've heard various horror stories from Swedish and other universities.
In general though, a researcher and a department needs external funds to have a functioning research program, post-docs and so on. And one of the major factors for getting a grant is your publication record in the subfield.
@cks Open source doesn't have to be unpaid work, and as you note it often isn't.
One paid source people often overlook: academia. Many researchers write code as part of their work, and policies as well as academic traditions dictate that you make it available to others. Open source pretty much started in academia after all.
@futzle 1. Using the barometer I measure the air pressure at the top, and call it A. Then measure it at the bottom, and call it B. Assume B-A=building height.
2. Post this process and solution on social media. Wait for about two minutes until 15 mortally offended nerds have replied with the correctly derived calculations and exact resulting height.
Most #conveyor belt #sushi places stopped circulating plates for you to take. It's now an order-only system where they send the plate you order to your table.
But Hama Sushi has recently added a second narrow touch screen that "circulates" the available items, much the same way as the old conveyor belt did. You can pick and order directly from that screen if you want.
And it works really well. You get inspiration for what to pick next, and it's fun to see the range of stuff scroll by. #japan
@esther My DSLR has a touchscreen. There are physical controls for using every aspect of the camera and I always use them.
But. The touchscreen *is* useful when you want direct spatial control. You review an image, so you zoom in and out and move around to look at details. You select shots on screen to delete. You use live view and select the point of focus. That is genuinely useful.
It's usually not the best input system. But occasionally it can be.
@arclight@0xabad1dea Do note that R doesn't really version its dependencies; whatever code your software runs today isn't necessarily what it runs tomorrow.
And more importantly, any given version of R doesn't keep its packages. Installing the exact same version of R in a year will likely be largely broken.
@aeva@TheZouave As a tip: paper authors are usually happy (delighted!) to send you a copy of the paper if you ask. If the citation is somewhat recent you'll at least get a good, crisp pdf, not a third generation photocopy.
But yes, papers are all created for print, not the web. Online repos (biomedcentral, arxiv, journal web sites) often do have a separate list of citations, and sometimes (as for biomedcentral ) links directly to the paper.
@aeva@TheZouave Most research is paywalled, often even to other researchers. I have published papers that I myself don't have access to. It's absolutely ridiculous. That's why Sci-hub is thriving for instance.
So it's absolutely normal and expected to ask people for papers. I absolutely understand that it feels awkward if you're not used to it though.
But it's a crappy bandaid that even researchers have done for decades, because all incentives point toward keeping this crappy system and no incentives point away.
Again, the first thing needed would be a modern replacement for pdf *files*, one that does things so much better it's worth the pain of switching. The main audience for papers is other researchers and web pages don't work.
@liztai Difference is Substack the company has been actively promoting them, specifically, and monetizing them, even as they downrank or remove other content. They make it clear they don't just tolerate it; they like that content just fine.
It's our content. We decide what happens to it. If I wanted to block usernames beginning with "g" I could, and it's my decision to do so.
You can decide I'm a moron not worth listening to and move on. But you don't have an intrinsic right to see what I post, just because someone else gets to see it.
It's a sliding scale from "Nobody except my wife" to "Everyone except assman123" and I, not you, get to decide where to be on that scale when I post.
Programmer and computational neuroscientist, now HPC support engineer in Okinawa, Japan. Photography, bouldering, recreational programming and playing the sanshin are things I do. Sweden, Osaka and Okinawa are places I particularly care about.