@whitequark you mean explanations for questions like, "why is that presenter standing within a few feet of a pair of animals in a state of blood lust when he found out that each of them weighs as much as a ford mustang?"
On one hand it definitely sounds odd to talk about scientific inquiry about the behavior of a modern human-made artifact.
But on the other hand, we have to do profiling runs and other experiments because the mere fact that humans built these machines has not endowed anyone with the ability to consistently & accurately predict the performance characteristics of hardware & software (not before we do a profiling run on a particular input, anyway).
@neauoire@tk the big flakes can appear more when you're closer to a wildfire; possibly the Bear Gulch fire, which seems to have spread very rapidly in the past 24 hours?
@lanodan@navi@a1ba i don't know if this can work, but i wish we had a system programming language where you get parallelism by expressing things in a way that's similar to how targets & dependencies are expressed in a Makefile (or in a ninja.build file): you express the set of outputs required at some point, and elsewhere, you express the computation that produces those outputs, (and likewise for the dependencies of *those* computations, and so on)...
@lanodan@navi@a1ba the compiler for this language would take this high-level description and build a dependency graph, and then translate that dependency graph into uses of thread APIs for dispatching & synchronization
@mcc > "Version 2", as I understood it, would be [...] exposing the Linux layer only via VM.
hm...
i appreciate & respect the motive here (iiuc to prioritize the manifestation of a replacement for windows, which may require some loss of compatibility with userland linux-type stuff)...
but if there is any possible way to keep native linux userland functionality, that would be very very very very very very [inhale] *very* nice...
@mcc like, if i had a system that is like hikari's, *and* also executes linux binaries natively, then i would want to use that as a machine for software development, which would mean the union of e.g.:
@whitequark@Soblow it seems like bazel is so awkward outside of google that, if a project is built with bazel, then it probably also ought to ship with at least one justfile:
@Soblow@whitequark google probably doesn't have an incentive to make it work nicely for people who don't work at google (which, if you're at google, then you have access to a lot of internal tooling & documentation, and i would bet that some of those tools/docs makes it easier to use/learn bazel)
@dalias@futurebird "actively collaborating with the regime" seems to increase the chances that you'll eventually end up on trump's shitlist, but somewhat less so if you also add "continuously subservient"