@inthehands On the one hand, I agree - if nothing else, because caring, doing and building are what I *want* to do.
But on the other hand: "We will rebel against the AI oligarchs by creating *even better* training data for them!"
@inthehands On the one hand, I agree - if nothing else, because caring, doing and building are what I *want* to do.
But on the other hand: "We will rebel against the AI oligarchs by creating *even better* training data for them!"
@inthehands They're just going to take it anyway.
@inthehands As I said just a while ago: Every big tech press event these last few years have felt like "Announcing our exciting plans for oligarchs to strip-mine the entire world and immiserate all of humanity! Get on board, and also death to the unbelievers!"
@thomasfuchs Isn't Kagi also run by AI bros?
(Me, I currently default to noai.duckduckgo.com - but every now and then I also try out Qwant and Ecosia.)
@thomasfuchs I find myself wishing that I was in a little capsule getting away from here as fast as I possibly could.
(But then I remember that they have Outlook and Windows in that capsule. Possibly Teams, too.)
@mattly I feel much the same way. My OCD is one reason I *strongly* prefer to avoid conversational or "agentic" LLM systems.
@thomasfuchs @dcrossney (Footnote: I don't think books are going away, ever.
Radio, TV, the PC and the Internet were all supposed to kill books, and none of them did. LLMs certainly won't.)
@thomasfuchs @dcrossney *Obviously* LLMs don't make books obsolete; how on Earth could they?
I was responding to the point that the invention of writing led to LLMs.
@thomasfuchs Oh, heavens no. There's a diversity of vendors.
You can choose between two evil megacorporations, a fascist billionaire's ketamine-addled hobby project and two apocalyptic cults.
@mattly How do you figure that would work?
(because communicating on the internet is the worst: I'm not being snarky, I want to know.)
@mattly Yes, and I've been thinking similar things about online communities in general.
But I don't really see how this would apply to the distribution of code?
(It seems to me that functionally, the only two options now are public domain, or hiding it behind eg. a cloud service.)
@thomasfuchs Today, I saw this little meditation from the developer of Gram, a fork of the Zed editor.
@mattly In the playthrough I'm currently paused on I used a "trick" during character generation: If you pick one of the pregenerated characters and then press "back", you can use a pregen character sprite with an otherwise custom character.
The reason I did this was that I *really* wanted to play a Greybeard who looks like the Dream Tortoise. I like the idea of a very old turtle-man wandering around hitting evildoers with a stick and berating them.
@thomasfuchs Describe it to me.
I need some beauty in computing.
@thomasfuchs A lemon.
@mattly Right.
I've been very fortunate out in the offline world.
Frighteningly many programmers I've met online have been complete assholes - rich or not.
@mattly (I'm not sure I get the connection.)
@mattly counterpoint: I'm a programmer with a fairly broad humanities background, and I seem to be a lot more miserable than those Silicon Valley fuckheads.
@thomasfuchs Also, most of the slop machine enthusiasts I know aren't concerned about deskilling because they say skills are worthless now anyway.
@thomasfuchs Sure. I'm saying that there's a considerable blast radius as well.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.