Notices by CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site), page 3
-
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 08:31:22 JST CyberSpook?? Hmmmm. It's called "Linux Foundation," not "GNU+Linux Foundation." Really makes you think. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 07:44:11 JST CyberSpook?? Copyright is a mistake in the first place, the logic of intellectual theft is itself a problem. Copyright needs to be abolished, not strengthened, it's an instrument of oppression, an institution of power, not emancipation, the very reason that these huge corporations use copyright forces everyone else to do the same just to survive, making the copyright law stronger instead of weaker makes things worse. Copyright should die in a fire, it is the by-product of the capitalists' insatiable profit-seeking, nothing more. By supporting it you support capitalist exploitation. Simple as that. It's class collaborationism to its fullest, the true expression of neoliberalism, the desire of petty capitalists to be rich and successful at the expense of everyone else and a delusion that the copyright law will save them from the bigger fish (won't happen, the capitalist market will eat them alive). -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 22:00:44 JST CyberSpook?? @lanodan
Server-side software isn’t the software you run so it is irrelevant, you cannot audit the server-side software, period. Accessing a site is akin to using proprietary software. There’s no ifs or buts, it is outside of your control. However, JavaScript runs directly on your computer so it’s akin to running proprietary spyware with a universal backdoor so get rid of it.If you can self-host or use offline libre software, do it. It is the only way to guarantee software freedom, there’s no other option unless you make your connection absolutely secure and anonymous as much as you can.
@Suiseiseki -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:55:07 JST CyberSpook?? Open Core is an outgrowth of Open Source because the open-source crowd does not care about freedom, preferring opportunist collaborationism with Big Tech giants (the Big Tech obviously exploits their naiveté for their own gains but what did they expect?). Associating yourself with an open-source movement is associating yourself with this opportunist collaborationism, and I don't know why you would want to do that.
Open Source is synonymous with libre software but not always (as I said before, software that is encumbered with intellectual property issues is not libre, neither is the one tied to non-libre software). While 90% of the time non-libre software is proprietary even if it's made from open-source software (Android), it's not black-and-white, it's more complicated than that.
I'm not saying that "free software" is a better name. It's a terrible name that leads to more confusion, hence "libre software" and "freedom software" are better names. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:03:07 JST CyberSpook?? I understand this. But most devices don't do even this basic thing. And you also must take into account that FSF restricts its sphere of concern to libre software, although Stallman himself supports all libre movements.
Regarding LibreJS: you should look into JShelter. LibreJS is not the only extension FSF made and JShelter gives you more freedom when it comes to using websites.
I didn't say I only support libre software. I support libre hardware too. I support libre everything. I think if there was some libre hardware certification that would've been great. There is OSHWA but it has the same problems of OSI and its OSHWD is rather… bloated. Just like OSD. I think both RYF and OSHWA are important though, one for the bare minimum, the other as an extra certificate on top. Same for Right to Repair. It's like with UNIX: all these pieces do one specific thing. But when they're used together they create something more. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:03:05 JST CyberSpook?? I didn't. That's what I wrote in my post. Libre firmware/software and libre hardware are two completely different things. Now, I think one can get rid of all proprietary firmware only through libre hardware. Because how are you going to remove it otherwise? It's tied to an SoC. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:03:02 JST CyberSpook?? I'm not saying that we should stop at what is provided by the FSF. That mindset is legit conservative. But I really don't think Stallman has intended all this to be sacred cows. I think it's taking an "ought" from an "is:" the fact that RYF is the accepted certification does not mean we should accept this certification. GPL itself changed over time and adopted to changing realities like Tivoization, stopping somewhere and saying "Yes, this is perfect" is contradictory to the whole history of libre software, starting from when Stallman started replacing proprietary UNIX software with libre GNU alternatives. I would even argue that it plays into the hands of proprietary developers and is the sole reason of the existence of the open-source movement. That is, compromizes, moderation, conservatism. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 20:50:27 JST CyberSpook?? That's debatable. I'm not hating on GNU or anything but that's kind of a relative claim and depends on the case-by-case basis. Claiming that all the GNU software is better than anything else is not exactly an unbiased claim, although it's still impressive hnw Stallman and his team were able to make a complete operating system in such a short time. Not as cool as TempleOS but still. Really makes you think that the BSD folks' claim of GNU+Linux being inconsistent is false because it's mainly due to the software that wasn't developed by the GNU Project. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 20:24:59 JST CyberSpook?? @lanodan
It's not necessary to use the software produced by the FSF to be a libre software supporter, it's a false dichotomy. Libre software is not software made by the FSF. The FSF and The GNU Project try to supplant you with basic tools so there's at least something. Plus those who produce better libre software don't really want to make it a part of the GNU Project. That's not the problem of FSF but of the developers of the software in question, the FSF can't do anything about it. Both GNU, the free distros list and RYF are "opt-in," meaning that the FSF won't add anyone unless they want to.
@Suiseiseki -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 19:40:40 JST CyberSpook?? @nyx
It's hard being a Stirnerian Stallmanite…
@lanodan -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 19:40:37 JST CyberSpook?? - Since when was Stallman conservative?
- It’s not about “leaders,” you do not understand. Stirnerites don’t need leaders, they need apprentices. I do not share Stallman’s moralism and left-liberal sentiments, Hayley’s position is more attractive to me. It’s the same logic of identity essentialism, thinking that just because you share something in common with others you should always agree with them on everything ever. I, for example, don’t think it makes sense to use “per/pers” as a gender-neutral pronoun. Something that Stallman thinks makes sense.
-
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 18:52:28 JST CyberSpook?? Those guys love to install proprietary software without asking, that’s not what I would call “great”.
Yeah, sure, but OpenBSD almost doesn’t have proprietary software. I dunno why they keep those bits. But with HyperbolaBSD we will have a 100% libre system.
rms used a time-sharing system with others with no security at MIT and the system worked just fine.
A local network is a different use case, we are connected to the Internet now. Obviously local computers are more trustworthy.
Security is a convenience feature really.
I partially agree with you. Certainly, people always gravitate towards complete security solutions for convenience sake (the reason why antiviruses are so popular). But security is still needed, especially when your communication isn’t restricted to your local network. So while libre software is more important, security is at least the close second. That does not mean that a secure proprietary system is better. That means that a secure libre system is better.
-
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 18:33:02 JST CyberSpook?? There is no system but GNU and Linux is one of its kernels. Amen. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Sunday, 18-Dec-2022 06:30:26 JST CyberSpook?? [accept all cookies]…
MR. OLIVA, DON’T DO THIS!
@evan -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Thursday, 15-Dec-2022 06:03:02 JST CyberSpook?? The firmware is still software, you know. BIOS is indeed software. All of it is the software you run. UEFI itself is a tiny operating system. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Dec-2022 02:51:36 JST CyberSpook?? @lxo
Also, I do wish the recommendation algorithms ran locally, that would be very based. Wish we had a service like Spotify that functioned like that and didn’t require JavaScript or uBlock Origin. I would also not mind crypto mining inside the browser as long as it’s libre, private and unintrusive. And does not rely on advertisements (looking at you, Brave).
@edendestroyer -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Dec-2022 01:51:38 JST CyberSpook?? I certainly recognize the heritage of GNU in Alpine, regardless of whether it can be considered GNU/Linux or not. Denying that is just blindness. It's like denying that GNU carries the heritage of UNIX. I don't know why somebody would do something like that, it's historical denialism. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Dec-2022 01:51:37 JST CyberSpook?? @lxo I think that the real reason stuff was ported to Alpine at all is because Alpine is Linux-based and UNIX-like. musl seems to not be ready for desktops, glibc isn't going to be replaced any time soon. But Google definitely tries. Just look at Fucsia.
Hyperbola has plans to utilize OpenBSD without proprietary blobs. Just shows that all Unix-likes are united against the Windows menace and rely on each others' developments to grow, making the fully libre Unix-like future possible. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 12-Dec-2022 22:21:55 JST CyberSpook?? People hate the name LiGNUx? The only objections to it that I have is that it looks bizarre and it isn't as obvious that GNU's in it, some people may not notice it or perhaps think it's some name of an obscure distro or something (like GNewSense). But I certainly don't hate it, just think that GNU+Linux looks cooler and clearer.
Fun fact: if you abbreviate "GNU+Linux" it becomes GPL. That's a sign. -
Embed this notice
CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Monday, 12-Dec-2022 17:16:03 JST CyberSpook?? That's certainly an interesting way to look at it. Seems like there are different points of view not only in the Linux vs GNU+Linux debate but also between those who support calling it GNU+Linux as well. And then there's an internal debate of whether it's better to call it GNU/Linux, GNU+Linux or LiGNUx and some people downright omit the slash and call it GNU Linux. So many nuances.
And no, I don't think Alpine Linux's devs did it just to spite the GNU Project. They probably did it simply to make it lighter on resources for embedded and container use. Also, there is a belief that the glibc and coreutils' code isn't tidy enough, although if they thought so it would have been nice of them to contribute their alternative solutions to the GNU Project which they did not do for whatever reason.