GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site), page 2

  1. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 19:06:06 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    • CyberSpook??
    • ¢υяισυѕ тнιηкєя :openbsd: ? ? ?
    @Suiseiseki
    The main reason why Stallman has even made distributing the source code a requirement is because reverse-engineering software is a fucking nightmare and a specialty of a few professionals. Most people can't really audit this mess, like, at all. Even C and assembly language are piss-hard to audit and debug. So no, the source code doesn't really matter if we can just disassemble the entire program with a press of a button. But we can't really do it.
    @curiousthinker
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 19:06:06 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:41:00 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    Ehhhhhhhhhh… That's not really the main thing they support. FSF supports software freedom. They also support software freedom. So they support FSF. It's not that they support FSF and therefore support software freedom.

    I do occasionally call them "FSF fans" as opposed to "OSI fans" but… Eh, I dunno, the organization that represents software freedom isn't as important. We just don't have any others that aren't othwr branches of FSF like FSFE and FSFLA. Also maybe EFF but software freedom isn't EFF's main concern. So technically they are GNU/FSF/FSFE/FSFLA/SFC/SFLC/Mozilla/Tor/EFF supporters. But that's a mouthful.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:41:00 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  3. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:23 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    Perens is no longer a part of the OSI, he doesn't like Open Source either. So if you criticize Stallman then might as well criticize Perens as well.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:23 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:22 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • CyberSpook??
    @lanodan Stallman does not criticize Perens in particular but the open-source community and OSI. Against Perens he doesn't hold personal grudges, he never expressed his hatred for Perens anywhere ever. It's a folly to associate communities or organizations with one single person connected to them. A community is always a generalization, not an expression of the individual's motives and uniqueness. It's about consensus, ideological status-quo, spooks if you will.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:22 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  5. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:19 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

    On the other hand, I don’t think that really applies to GNU/FSF.

    >willingly ignoring the egoist telekommunist branch

    Look. None of the communities are exactly homogenous in the first place. Moreover, even if you say “Open Source” you’re not necessarily an open-source advocate (like with Perens). Some people (wrongly) think that saying “Open Source” is less ambiguous but that doesn’t mean they aren’t still libre software supporters. Some libre software supporters may have personal grudges against RMS or FSF. That also doesn’t make them not libre software supporters. Yes, many libre software supporters support RMS and FSF because they have solidarity with them but it isn’t necessarily the case. There’s a lot of gray area but the point is made about the generally accepted ideologies rather than more specific cases. Thinking that either of these communities are homogenous is misguided.

    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:19 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:18 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • CyberSpook??
    @lanodan In a way it's like equating all socialists, even egoist ones, as basically Stalinites. Obviously it couldn't be further from the truth. "Socialism" is just an umbrella term, it only denotes vague commonalities. There are all kinds of schisms going on. Same with libre software supporters. Like, aside from egoists vs moralists we have rivalries between Lispers and traditional programmers, we have those who support Codes of Conduct and those who despise them, we have libre software moderates and libre software maximalists, etc., etc.

    There is no homogeneity. Never was.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:18 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  7. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:13 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    Yes. I get it. But Stallman mainly opposes the official position. And generally, many people who advocate for Open Source also support the official position. Same for libre software supporters. That's why they're generalizations: it's not an attack on people but on a certain mindset. You may not like the general mindset of the libre software supporters. That is fine, it is your choice. But again, Stallman doesn't attack individual people. He doesn't attack the open-source supporters' personal character (something I notice many times when someone attacks the libre software crowd), it's simply the issue of common goals and core organizations (which, again, not everyone may share but that's not what Stallman is talking about). That's it. This is the main difference. Or perhaps you think that Stallman has an issue with how people act? Even if he does, it isn't the core of his critique of the open-source movement.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:13 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  8. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:10 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    FSF supporters are part of it but you're right… I think clearer terms would be "software freedom supporters" and "open-source development model supporters." That's what I mean by "libre software supporters" and "Open Source supporters."
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 06:34:10 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  9. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 02:19:24 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • Sexy Moon
    • lainy
    @lain
    Wait. If these things are super-old does that mean that they were produced in the Glorious German People's Republic?
    @Moon
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 02:19:24 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  10. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 02:18:46 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • lainy
    Vending machines for burgers sound based but I am concerned about the quality of the food. Also, if nobody buys it it will get thrown away. Which sucks, so much waste.
    In conversation Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 02:18:46 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  11. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 22:42:25 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    • 翠星石
    • CyberSpook??
    • grillchen
    @Suiseiseki
    FOSS/FLOSS acronyms are a joke, everyone deciphers them however they want, they have no consistency and don't convey any meaningful message.
    @grillchen
    In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 22:42:25 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  12. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 22:42:24 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    • CyberSpook??
    • grillchen
    @Suiseiseki
    Also, saying "free software" is no better than saying "open-source software." Which means it's a terrible name that, again, doesn't make it apparent that it's its own type of software rather than freeware or just a source code made publically available. I may support Stallman but I will not back down from this opinion, I think the name was simply an oversight on Stallman's part which due to bureaucracy he cannot change.
    @grillchen
    In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 22:42:24 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  13. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 21:59:37 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    @lanodan https://inv.riverside.rocks/watch?v=3SHM9NmcNv8
    In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 21:59:37 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: inv.riverside.rocks
      Bruce Perens acknowledges Richard Stallman and GNU
      Bruce Perens one of the founders of the "Open Source Initiative" and leading developer of the Debian GNU/Linux distribution states that most of what he does comes from Richard Stallman and the GNU Project. Richard Stallman is the founder of the Free Software Foundation which created the GNU operating system. The GNU system is used together with the Linux "kernel" to have an operating system called GNU/Linux. To learn more about GNU visit: The GNU Project http://www.gnu.org The Free Software Foundation http://www.fsf.org
  14. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Thursday, 22-Dec-2022 04:47:29 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    • Alexandre Oliva
    @lxo Do you have any comments on the rapid spread of Rust in Linux? Does the Linux-libre team have any plans on replacing the trademarks?
    In conversation Thursday, 22-Dec-2022 04:47:29 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  15. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Dec-2022 20:35:53 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    Pretty sure the guy is a covert OSI agent.
    In conversation Wednesday, 21-Dec-2022 20:35:53 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  16. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Dec-2022 06:52:33 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • lainy
    The philosopher emoji.
    In conversation Wednesday, 21-Dec-2022 06:52:33 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  17. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 16:33:05 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    • ??? 妛彁 :xf_nyxsigil: :xf_nyxdisapproving:

    @Suiseiseki

    Meanwhile GNU Linux-libre hasn’t been subverted by corporations…

    Khe-khem, Rust, khe-khem.
    @nyx

    In conversation Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 16:33:05 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  18. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 16:28:26 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    • ¢υяισυѕ тнιηкєя :openbsd: ? ? ?
    @curiousthinker
    LOL, someone called you a cuck over using a BSD? Folks these days…
    @Suiseiseki
    In conversation Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 16:28:26 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  19. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 09:29:07 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    • 翠星石
    • CyberSpook??
    • ¢υяισυѕ тнιηкєя :openbsd: ? ? ?
    @curiousthinker
    I think the problem with your thinking is that you have an essentialist mindset when it comes to identity, you think that people of specific groups behave in a certain way. Which is no more than an illusion. I may be a libre software advocate. But I'm also a Stirnerite. That puts me at odds with even the people within the libre software movement, egoist telekommunism is a niche within a niche, I am a misfit even within the libre software community itself, even compared to Stallman himself. I have my own ideas of what ends the libre software is supposed to serve, my own views on ethics and the ideas of "right" and "wrong," which are pretty much incompatible with the libre software movement's consensus. Libre software movement is mostly a liberal movement. And I am a post-leftist. Big difference.
    @Suiseiseki
    In conversation Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 09:29:07 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  20. Embed this notice
    CyberSpook?? (cyberspook@soc.redeyes.site)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 08:37:20 JST CyberSpook?? CyberSpook??
    in reply to
    • 翠星石
    • ??? 妛彁 :xf_nyxsigil: :xf_nyxdisapproving:
    @nyx
    He's at least partially correct, the reason why Linux was subverted was simply because Linus isn't a libre software advocate by any stretch of imagination, he doesn't give a shit.

    The name "GNU+Linux" was partly made to distance GNU from Linux, not to appropriate Linux. Unlike calling it "GNU" or "Linux."
    @Suiseiseki
    In conversation Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 08:37:20 JST from soc.redeyes.site permalink
  • After
  • Before

User actions

    CyberSpook??

    CyberSpook??

    Штирнерист-трансгуманист, GNU/джихадист, мета-анархист, бывший анкап. Не люблю фемок, альтрайтов, неонацистов и мастододиков. Имею непопулярные взгляды, в том числе частично согласен с теорией великого замещения, но крайне несогласен с её выводами. Хайль Штирнер.Stirnerite transhumanist, GNU/Jihadist, meta-anarchist, ex-ancap. Dislike libfems, the alt-right, neo-Nazis and Mastodorks. Have some unpopular opinions, including partly agreeing with the Great Replacement Theory but strongly disagreeing with its conclusions. Heil Stirner.#anarchism #egoism #PostLeft #AcidCommunism #UserFreedom #nobot

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          1519
          Member since
          25 Jul 2022
          Notices
          102
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.