I am officially searchable on #Tootfinder!
Check out this URL: http://tootfinder.ch/index.php?query=%40atomicpoet%40mastodon.social&submitquery=Search
Also see screenshot.
Let's see if enough people can make Fediverse search a proper thing!
I am officially searchable on #Tootfinder!
Check out this URL: http://tootfinder.ch/index.php?query=%40atomicpoet%40mastodon.social&submitquery=Search
Also see screenshot.
Let's see if enough people can make Fediverse search a proper thing!
@Andres I’ve had this conversation so many times.
So here goes. Some people want to make public posts. They just don’t want to be indexed.
Essentially, they want social discovery for the right group of people but to be hard to find by a different group.
Mastodon doesn’t work that way. Nevertheless, that’s what they want.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews @Andres I wonder if it’s possible to have public groups that anyone can join but are protected from indexing by only allowing logged in users to access the URLs of the group. If you want to see posts without joining you need to solve captcha
The other thing to remember about #Tootfinder is that it’s a proof of concept.
Yes, Google indexes more Fediverse posts.
However, many people don’t like Google indexing Fediverse posts.
You can argue whether or not public posts should be indexed—that’s not my concern.
My concern is whether people who object to search will object to #Tootfinder—seeing how it’s explicitly opt-in.
We’ll see in the coming days ?
@atomicpoet I think "not listed" works as "keep this post in the :fediverse: " so anyone can re-toot and interact, but it doesn't show to search engines.
After I opted in, it took me roughly one minute for my posts to show up in #Tootfinder.
That's pretty fast!
Someone asked if their replies to me will show up on #Tootfinder
No, they won't!
This search is purely opt-in, and will only display posts from folks like me who blatantly want #Tootfinder to index them.
Pretty sweet, right?
#Tootfinder removes your posts after 14 days.
It doesn’t index your posts forever. This is not a permanent archive of your toots.
Remember this when you’re using this search engine!
@Big_Diggity @fediversenews fediverse.info is pretty cool, actually. But that one is a directory for finding people to follow, and it’s based on hashtags.
@dansup has some cool ideas for future implementations for it.
@atomicpoet
How is this different than the #fedi22 idea on https://fediverse.info/explore/people ? Or is it the same idea?
@fediversenews
@TeaPol @atomicpoet @fediversenews
If it becomes mainstream then sure it should become configurable.
My only doubts about it is that there's much less value in any search if there's a non deterministic indexing of content.
@simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews
I'm under the impression this is merely the first of many indexes and they might all start asking for different means of consent.
Also it'd be cool if one could opt-in to indexing with a post instead of the whole account, which is a landmine without a special field.
@TeaPol @atomicpoet @fediversenews
Three characters?
@atomicpoet @fediversenews
My main question is if you could make it easier for the opt-in integrated directly into the UI.
Losing characters in one's profile description due to the need for indexing is probably a challenge for some folks.
@simon_lucy @TeaPol @atomicpoet @fediversenews
So, how do you think should people opt-in for searching? I might just write my own solution to this in the form of a #relay or a service to #apps, which would enhance their search functionality.
@Stark9837 @TeaPol @atomicpoet @fediversenews
I'm probably the wrong person to ask. My prejudice is that if it's public it should be searchable, in the context it was published at least.
@atomicpoet @TeaPol @fediversenews The first version was OAuth, but because the scope of an access token is so wide, this was controversial for a reason. It is not possible to OAuth on Mastodon only to prove ownership of the accoumnt. See https://tootfinder.ch/wiki/index.php?name=verification-of-consent
@Stark9837 @simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews
Do it.
I think having a consent term in the profile or post is probably the least likley to cause un-intended opt-ins but if the consent is there the method isnt as important.
@buercher @atomicpoet @fediversenews
I'm an idiot when it comes to OAuth. I'll take a look. Thanks!
@simon_lucy @Stark9837 @atomicpoet @fediversenews
Legally and functionally that's true, but I know some folks want their privacy that might not like that.
@TeaPol @buercher @atomicpoet @fediversenews Yes Mastodon support OAuth only w read/write access. It was discussed in the forum a few yrs back. Look for comments from @aaronpk. He advocated use of Permissionless OAuth as is done by IndieAuth. In the absence of that, @owncast has improvised it by sending OTP as a DM. They call it FediAuth.
@TeaPol @Stark9837 @simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews Why is consent even a thing? I understand the consent for someone's data when it's a company collecting, but when it's being used to enhance the experience of both the internet at large and the experience of the poster being able to be discovered? Not wanting search is silly.
@katmmoss @TeaPol @Stark9837 @simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews I think it's because sometimes people will use search to find and bully other people. It can be used for evil. I'm fine if my posts are searched, but others are more sensitive.
@ddr @TeaPol @Stark9837 @simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews True. Maybe I'm just too much of an open book for my own good, then. LOL
@katmmoss @ddr @Stark9837 @simon_lucy @atomicpoet @fediversenews
I think many are, but being sensitive to others needs is something only The Fediverse could provide.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.