@Thorium@wendynather there are a few. I'm using @GrapheneOS, for example. It's a security-hardened privacy-focused Android (AOSP) system, fully FOSS (if you refrain from installing the sandboxed Google Play, etc).
@stefan@tedium if Mastodon were larger, it would have this same problem but worse (since there is no centralized moderation); there's nothing stopping somebody from setting up @stefan@stefanbohacek.link or @stefan@stefanbobecek.online. It's a cost of federation.
I don't understand how Chrome is worth "at least $15-$20 billion" when it's >99% FOSS. Developing Chromium is a giant money sink and the only reason it outperforms Firefox is that it's backed by a company willing to pay that bill.
If Chrome is sold, the buyer will be forced to either monetize it somehow (how? Remember how poorly that worked for Opera and Netscape before them?) or else to go non-profit with some other source of funding.
The Right™ option in this line of thinking would be to force a new Chrome Foundation non-profit and to either fine GOOG enough to establish an endowment for it or else to implement some sort of corporate tax on web/cloud services to fund it (or, at the corporation's discretion, Mozilla, whose primary funding comes from Google today and will likely dry up with this ruling).
@ryanc IANAL, but my understanding of the Apache License is that it simply ensures the underlying patents are freely available to the software's users; you can't yank out the rug. Yes, that might be a complication if you want to sell your related patent, as the new owner cannot retract the software's licence.
@ryanc I recommend the Apache License 2.0 for this. It's a bit stronger wrt conferring protections regarding patents. The FSF even prefers it for this tier of FOSS:
The Apache License 2.0 is the best non-copyleft license that does what a copyright license can to mitigate threats from software patents. It's a well-established, mature license that users, developers, and distributors alike are all comfortable with. You can tell it's important by the way that other free software licenses work to cooperate with it: the drafting processes for GPLv3 and the Mozilla Public License 2.0 named compatibility with the Apache License 2.0 as a goal from day one.
Am I missing something wrt Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto? Doesn't he just have to sign something with one of Nakamoto's keys or transfer the first bitcoin in a publicly verifiable manner? Bitcoin is pseudonymous rather than anonymous... https://www.wired.com/story/craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-trial/
@ryanc@astraleureka I've been confused about that since moving here. The last time I checked, there were three or so licenses in the whole ofNYC (or maybe just Manhattan). Most of the places that looked like dispensaries were selling CBD. Then something changed and they a sell everything.
"Semiannual" means "twice a year" while "biannual" is usually a synonym but can alternatively mean "every two years" (aka "biennial"). Confusingly, "biweekly" usually means every two weeks.
Cybersecurity researcher of #antispam at @TalosSecurity, FOSS advocate, zsh/bash #Linux geek, bastion of obscure knowledge.Support freedom for ✊🏿🇺🇦🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️♀️he/they.In NYC, previously Maine, SF, Boston.Not representing any entity but myself (and occasionally your mom).I run :opensource::debian::linux::bash::firefox::vim::signal::donor:#fedi22 searchable