Am I missing something wrt Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto? Doesn't he just have to sign something with one of Nakamoto's keys or transfer the first bitcoin in a publicly verifiable manner? Bitcoin is pseudonymous rather than anonymous...
https://www.wired.com/story/craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-trial/
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Adam Katz :donor: (adamhotep@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 03-Feb-2024 08:10:25 JST Adam Katz :donor: -
Embed this notice
Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 03-Feb-2024 08:10:24 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: @adamhotep He put forth multiple fake proofs that were unimpressive in their technical sophistication. I'd have done better.
I had a brief interaction with him on Twitter where he clearly didn't understand things Satoshi would have known.
At some point he called me a "monkey" some sort of article he wrote.
In conversation permalink Attachments
-
Embed this notice
Adam Katz :donor: (adamhotep@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 03-Feb-2024 08:25:36 JST Adam Katz :donor: @ryanc That seems pretty clear. He's not even claiming to have "lost" the keys.
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 03-Feb-2024 08:38:07 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: @adamhotep He's full of shit and I would be happy to go say that in court so long as he's there and I get to flip him the bird.
In conversation permalink
-
Embed this notice