@jwildeboer I expect the summary to be in the summary field and the content to be in the content field, which is why I hate RSS that puts either in the description field.
@jwildeboer also mastodon that treats the summary field as a content warning, subverting the entire point of standardising this in Activity Streams in the first place and preserving that in Activity Pub 12 years later
Key findings: 45% of all AI answers had at least one significant issue. 31% of responses showed serious sourcing problems – missing, misleading, or incorrect attributions. 20% contained major accuracy issues, including hallucinated details and outdated information. Gemini performed worst with significant issues in 76% of responses, more than double the other assistants, largely due to its poor sourcing performance.
“We've normalized software catastrophes to the point where a Calculator leaking 32GB of RAM barely makes the news. This isn't about AI. The quality crisis started years before ChatGPT existed. AI just weaponized existing incompetence. […] We've created a perfect storm: tools that amplify incompetence, used by developers who can't evaluate the output, reviewed by managers who trust the machine more than their people.” https://techtrenches.substack.com/p/the-great-software-quality-collapse
@ariaflame@Kensan@shortridge the other challenge with being back in the UK is that half the year UTC and local time are the same. Oh, and being near 0 longitude..
@Kensan@shortridge this reminds me of the "python only parses dates correctly after the 12th of the month" problem I had. (The dates in the files I was being sent had been changed to UK dd/mm/YYYY format. Python assumes mm/dd/YYYY unless the mm>12)
@Nickiquote@halfempty You know, I think what he is really building is the copy of the Total Perspective Vortex in Zarniwoop's pocket universe that is only there to serve his ego.
@halfempty@Nickiquote exactly. If you were doing a Heinlein reference you'd call it Mycroft (from Moon is a Harsh Mistress) or Minerva (from Time Enough For Love). But Musk is basically Vroomfondel, making money on the chatshow circuit predicting what AI will do.
@lmorchard@evan the bsky one that works is a browser extension, so that is a viable technique until people end their twitter accounts. You could also the following.js in the Twitter export, but that's uids, so you'd need a name cache somewhere.
@mmasnick@quinn@riana@danmcd@alecm@normative I read this as "nerd herder" in the first post and thought it was a very different concept, and it also made me think of Carrie Fisher
Suggestion for @phanpy Threads web has a nice affordance where people you don't follow have a little plus sign in that you can click to follow them. It turns into a tick when you do. (The tick is only in the immediate post-follow context, normally people you follow are unbadged)
“I’m seeing a revival now,” said Levels, regarding PHP. “People are getting sick of frameworks. All the JavaScript frameworks are so… what do you call it, like [un]wieldy. It takes so much work to just maintain this code, and then it updates to a new version, you need to change everything. PHP just stays the same and works.” https://thenewstack.io/developers-rail-against-javascript-merchants-of-complexity/