@not_br549@sickburnbro Why kill a guy they rolled every time, on every issue, the last time? He sold out easy - never put up a fight.
Remember when he was selling us out on the 2nd Amendment, and it was Pence trying to reel him back from his "Take the Guns First / Due Process Later" position? Freaking Pence was to the "right" of Trump - is how bad it was. The full-clip is better - including Feinstein smiling and literally rubbing her hands together, in the Jewy way they do.
It seems like the Biden period has made people forget how much Trump sucked on literally EVERY issue.
@sickburnbro This is what he said the last time - even referencing Eisenhower then, as well. No one who isn't a "fan" would fall for it, again.
And this 11M statement - what about the other ~40(?) Million illegals? Is this a "just the ones Biden let in go back," offer? Notice no talk about busting employers (practical - unlike round-ups) - nothing like his do-able proposals from 2016:
> Immigration law doesn't exist for the purpose of keeping criminals out. It exists to protect all aspects of American life. The work site, the welfare office, the education system, and everything else. That is why immigration limits are established in the first place.
> If we only enforced the laws against crime, then we have an open border to the entire world. (Obama's "Bad Hombres" policy, which Trump continued as POTUS) > We will enforce all of our immigration laws. > In a Trump Administration, all immigration laws will be enforced. Will be enforced. (Trump never gave the order) ...
> For those here illegally today who are seeking legal status, they will have one route and one route only. To return home and apply for re-entry like everybody else under the rules of the new legal immigration system that I have outlined above. (DACA Vermin - Trump asked to shamnesty 3x more than Obama, in a "Bill of Love" - echoing Jeb)
- "Immigration Policy Speech," Phoenix AZ, 2016
His only selling point is "Biden is even worse than I was." He can't even make that claim vs Obama.
@sickburnbro@transgrammaractivist I doubt any Trumpster-supporters who watch porn think anything will come of it. Even if he made this a public policy, it would just be another grift for a back-hander - this time from the porn industry.
Similar to when he floated a "Childhood Vaxx Injury Commission" to get $1M from Pfizer - donations from Big-Tech for H1B + OPT visas continuing - outsourcers to flip from a proposed 35% tariff on Mexico to his "Keep Our Factories in Mexico" raw-deal - Continue all the wars for the MIC - the AB-fundraiser for him to oppose the Bud-Light boycott, etc.
Trump was as corrupt as they come - similar as the others, but more brazen in doing in-our-face 180-degree policy reversals, which are anathema to what "conservatives" supposedly care about. He knows his WWF/sportsball-mentality cult will continue to sing his praises, no matter how many daggers he put in our backs.
@sickburnbro@transgrammaractivist A "leak" that Trump will "ban porn," is for: > "How do we make Trump look better to Evangelicals, to spite having a public track record as an LGBTPedo-loving, Family-Wrecking, Hooker-Screwing weirdo, with lifelong "NYC Values" on social-issues?"
Last time they had Mike Pence go out and do his wavering preacher-voice bit about putting God first, to cover that base. This time, Trump is on trial for trying to pay off a whore, among other things.
It doesn't help he keeps holding those ~annual Mar-A-Lago Fag-Fests, either - with the following themes: 2021 - "Let's use Civil Rights Laws to Force Doctors to Faggot-Mutilate Children" 2022 - "Let's Celebrate Biden signing the Degeneration of Marriage to include mentally ill feces-wallowers" 2024 - "Melania is back, to host a Fag-Fest"
@sickburnbro I hope to get people not to vote for either half of the Trump/Biden tag-team. Look what he just supported last week with Johnson.
Making the libs "feel bad" doesn't compare to seeing that lying, back-stabbing, war-mongering, gun-hating, Death-Vaxx pushing, LGBTPedo-loving piece of filth lose.
Team-Biden is bad enough, but they don't have an army of blind cultists, who think they are "on the right" as they support that Limousine Liberal Neo-Con, screaming "USA, USA," to cover for the Uniparty's anti-American policy.
@sickburnbro Brix is STILL lying - pretends they didn't tell people they needed to vaxx to "protect others" - when they KNEW this deadly product did not stop transmission/spread.
Also: > “They were very effective for what they were supposed to be used for, which was preventing severe disease and hospitalization or deaths.” No - the opposite is true, based on multiple nation's statistics. The vaxxed are MORE likely to get, be hopsitalized from, and die from covid vs the unvaxxed.
She is also lying about the side-effects: > “That happens often with immunizations that if the natural disease can cause it, then it also sometimes can be seen in certain profiles of the vaccine. "
TWO points lying, with that remark: - ONLY the elderly and very sick were EVER at risk of harm from Covid - while the Trumpcine Death-Vaxx harmed and killed healthy young people, who were NEVER AT RISK from Covid. - The Trumpcine Death-Vaxx caused types of injury which the virus did not - from the lipid nano-particle, DNA contamination, and concentration in areas of the body / organs which the virus did not affect.
@sickburnbro Yes. Because they couldn't take pictures of the actual classified docs for release to the public.
Similarly, Trump could not legally hold up a classified document to a reporter - some "invasion plans" - and say, "I can't declassify this one, because I'm not POTUS any more."
So, yes, the raid/trial was/is politically motivated. But also, Trump is an idiot.
@Cornelius@Dagnar As addressed in "WarStrike" episode 2, if you start any sort of activist-group and exclude Jews from it, you will be targeted for destruction by Jewish Power. This is true whether the group has a "left" or "right" POV.
Then factor in how Hollyweird directs public-sentiments among the normies (80%+ of all people). In the same episode, they addressed how "Jew-friendly" Judeo-Christian Evangelicism (Billy Graham, Pat Robertson, etc) was pushed by Jewish Hollyweird / Tee-Vee from a small minority of Christians at the end of WWII, to the largest religious faction, a few decades later (and to this day).
@sickburnbro The confiscation of foreign-assets crossed a big red-line. > "Oh, so you can just steal the money which we need to hold overseas, in order to do business with you, if we don't obey your latest whim?"
@Alduin@sickburnbro As a means of exchange, it is quite functional. I always thought bitcoin was silly. I could have made money if I didn't think that.
But, I still think it's silly - as a store of wealth - even though many holding it have a lot of wealth as a result. Tulips did something like this - though, they were actual physical goods with some inherent value.
Bitcoiin reminds me of the classical "dollar-auction" - but one that just keeps on bidding-up. At least, until the power goes off.
@sickburnbro Some of his civ-nat angles are better than status-quo - but there is also this:
> “I think that there’s two things that for critical race theorists drives them crazy, one is interracial marriage. I think that interracial marriage is a sign of progress,” said Rufo, himself a part of an interracial marriage.
> “I think also America is going to look very different in 100 years. You’re not going to be able to tell, ‘you’re black,’ ‘you’re white,’ ‘you’re Hispanic,’ ‘you’re Puerto Rican,’ whatever. It’s going to be very complex, and ultimately that’s going to be good,” he added.
@sickburnbro@Escoffier@drake_koefoed@CrustyB Good was formerly done by the NIH and at universities - the unis then being state-subsidized vs corporate-funded. We would need to rewind parts of this back to the 70s, and other parts to pre "Rockefeller Medicine" days - dig out all the rot.
@drake_koefoed@Escoffier@sickburnbro@CrustyB I want doctors to be relatively wealthy - like they were, when we had the best health-care in the world. I want the best and brightest to become docs vs some other high-paying profession. It wasn't doc's salaries which created this problem.
We were not short on hospitals in those days, because the non-profit hospital org could easily get a bank-loan at very low interest to expand, if the need / business was unfilled in an area. There was very low-risk to the bank, of the loan going unpaid - because old people are going to need periodic "repair" - and a smaller % of younger folks.
Where a govt-financed system may be needed, is in primary-residence home-loans, as RFK-Jr has proposed. But, this cannot be based on Fed-Reserve money, to be paid back at a higher interest rate than the low-interest loan, thus becoming a tax-funded subsidy / ponzi-scheme.
I do not say this in aversion to going after the elite who used corrupt-practices to 'de-home-own' millions of Americans. I would fully-support a law to force Blackstone/Blackrock to sell their residential real-estate holdings back to those the banks foreclosed-upon post-2008-crash - and at the bargain-price the banks sold those homes to THEM (blackstone), but refused to offer the former-homeowners on a re-finance.
@drake_koefoed@Escoffier@sickburnbro@CrustyB In the Good Old Days - Not-For-profit insurers did not try to block paying out legit-claims, because their charters made "the insured" their primary interest. Contrast to "the shareholder's profits" being the primary interest of "for-profit health insurance," now. This is why docs did not need an army of staff to get paid, back then.
The ONLY reason a corporation is needed, is to raise RISK CAPITAL. Medical has a guaranteed-market, due to the human condition, so this is a STUPID system to use for that function.
For stuff like smart-phones, a for-profit system is well suited - though, even in this case, "planned obsolescence" must be criminalized. I could do a long-tangent here on lightbulbs and computer chips (Intel AND Apple) ... see the film "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" for a brief primer on that subject: youtube.com/watch?v=BWJC5ieUAe4
@drake_koefoed@sickburnbro@CrustyB@Escoffier Competition does not increase costs, other than advertising-costs borne by all players. That is one reason why Big-Pharma could not advertise prescription drugs to the general-public, before the 80s. However, there was corruption in the medical-journals at that time (still is, today).
Yes - the other major problem with folks covering their own medical costs/insurance, is that MOST Americans live hand-to-mouth - cannot find $400 cash in an emergency.
@sickburnbro@CrustyB@Escoffier Healthcare was also less expensive, because the insurance orgs were regulated to be not-for-profits, and most hospitals were not-for-profits, run by the senior-docs who practiced there.
Obamacare was the "solution" in the "problem reaction solution" chain of events, which was started by 'de-regulation', which made costs skyrocket. In fact, Obamacare-type legislation, including the "individual mandate," was first proposed by Senate Republicans - written by the Heritage Foundation. They needed "left-cover" to pass it, hence Obama's role.
Goal: Save Civilization by removing the so-called "Jews" from power, then reversing their poisoning of our homelands - deporting the 3rd Worlders they flooded in, re-institutionalizing / banishing those infected with LGBTPedo-disease, and de-toxifying medicine and food.