I think there will come a day when mastodon is on it's way out like diaspora is now because it's so artificially limited ( tho even they have encrypted dm's lmao ) when something else comes along and shows actually you can do both timelines and groups at the same time, support other protocols like websub, while running on less resources etc. And think there are a lot of such projects being worked on currently.
like it really seems like Mastodon gets paid by Meta to do nothing while feeding user data directly to zuckerberg, and so what they do in the updates is fuck with the css on the webUI and other pointless things to look like they're doing something, meanwhile there's so many basic problems they don't even address, like how much of the racist harassment shit that comes up be solved by simple regex filters, something that should be foundational to any moderation system.
And they have this entire playbook for feature requests where they gaslight people into thinking it's not technically possible because it's not in the spec or some bullshit, until every other competitor has implemented the feature, and then they when they do it they say "we just wanted to do it right", like no you didn't want to do it, or really, you didn't want to pay someone to do it, because all their money goes into mastodon.social and advertising and C-suit salaries, like it took them years to implement edits lmao
mfs out here with a coherent sense of self rather than assemblages of atemporal fragments of identity pulling each other down like crabs in a bucket, I can't even relate to ya'll
the hatred xmpp gets is a little overblown, yeah it is unstable, the encryption is janky and poorly documented, but like homie, are you actually doing anything that requires this super high threat model? or are you just shitposting? half of ya'll mfs are openly inciting terrorism on fedi, which doesn't even pretend to be private
if you are doing that kind of stuff you shouldn't be chatting about it, or you should be coordinating over the deep web(if at all) on a dedicated device that probably isn't a phone lmao
it's just like, if XMPP+OMEMO were really this horrible insecure thing no one should trust, you would think they'd have found a whole bunch of 0days by now - i'm looking around and I haven't found any - that is how actual security researchers demonstrate the security vs. insecurity of an app or protocol, they do some penetration tests and find a vulnerability and publish it, to the benefit of the software they're testing and to their own careers
They don't just skim the docs and say 'oh this has unserious vibes don't use it" in a blog post, and then call whoever pushes back against that very shallow criticism a cargo cultist, that's not at all what an actual hacker does, a hacker will do the fucking work and not just talk out of their ass, resting on their status as an 'expert' because they know that credentials don't mean shit in real life
^^ such a transparent grift that, like had this "expert" tell me don't ever use XMPP but actually Whatsapp is the most secure thing out there. Ya know, the closed source Facebook app that asks for all the permissions. absolute clowns - it really is a sign of the age that any semblance of scientific rigour has been replaced with dogmatic punditry and most cannot tell the difference.
@abolisyonista@ni.hil.ist the marxoid love does love shitting on anarchists at every moment even if it means allying with the right, like I remember the reaction the the CHAZ/CHOP in 2020, marxoids just uncriticaly sharing right wing propaganda about it
There's a weird resentment they have towards anarchists, it is similar to how conservatives feel about liberals, like a fox news host hating on Obama because he's suave and cool, Leninists are not cool ( with the rare exeptions like Che Guevara, and one can scarcely imagine such a figure emerging today ) so they hate how cool and fun and hip anarchists are, when really they should be the cool ones everyone admires, the problem is the masses are too stupid and haven't read all the theory, that must be it, we'll see who laughs last
i'm half kidding but really people's motivations are often that petty
The stiuation in Honduras in recent years is a good case study in this, the left-wing LIBRE party has mass popular support and has continued to push fro progressive policies, but in practice making various concessions to foreign capitalists ( our town just got a Denny's and McDonalds yay ) , so it's pink as hell, neo-liberal socialism, and trying to hold onto political power with the ever looming threat of a foreign backed nationalist coup forces them into incredibly compromising position, so most of their 'reforms' end up being very minor / maintaining the basic functions of the government like maintaining infrastructure ( tbf things the previous regime failed to do )
If the nationalists get back in power ( there's an election year ) would mean basically a doge, the complete liquidation of any social safety net and probably the murder of thousands by right wing death squads -- rural paramilitaries continue to assassinate labour and indigenous leaders -- so even this milquetoast social democracy is worth fighting for, but to even suggest, for example the expropriation of the American megacorps like Dole isn't going to fly, the media is, obviously, controlled by the elites who are all anti LIBRE and paint them as extreme communists despite their milquetoast policies
So i think an American socialist party, or possibly socdem takeover of the democrats would look very similar in terms of a highly opportunistic and compromised populist party which inevitably stagnates
The answer in both cases is an autonomous workers movement, pushing from the outside to be more radical or else
i actually like people engaging with my posts, kinda the whole point of being here is the other people, if you don't like interaction maybe post on a blog or in a diary
@abolisyonista@ni.hil.ist despite my many issues with varying kinds of anarchism, the thing that has always prevented me from going marxist is sheer intellectual lazyness and dishonestly when criticizing their rivals on the left, especially anarchists, which in itself calls into questions their claim of theoretical rigour, in my experienced the best marxist theory tends to come from anarchists, or at least marxists who operate outside of these old isms, like Immanuel Wallerstein or CLR James
so all you very intelligent people are actually spending your time watching and commenting on a giant Apple commercial? i'm not saying you're a bunch of brainwashed consumerist losers but yes i am, stfu, literally talk about anything else
there really is no escape from this shit, it all makes sense to me now, this is why fascism is inevitable, why westerners won't do shit to stop the genocide, why trump won etc. because everyone has been raised from childhood to be a perfect consumer conformist, it is impossible to hold any radical positions, because the only thing anyone actually believes in is commodity fetishism. so any political stance is just a a skin, a phone case, an in app purchase, can't wait to move out to el campo
goes to Honduran rainforrest -- all the campesinos have iphones -- head explodes
Religion: :abunhd: Buddhist Gnosticism :explode:Philosophy: :sanity: Epicurean Skepticism :blobfoxdoubt:Politics: ๐ด Anarchist Communism ๐Tendency: Insurrectionary AutonomismOccupation: media expropriator Hobbies: I make music; write songs, play guitar, drums and synth, I fuck around with php and python but am bad at into, like to read philosoophy, science fiction, history... My Greatest Strength: I don't give a fuckMy Greatest Weakness My Greatest Strengthyes, I'm a hackerno, I don't know how to codedeal with itFree free to interact with any post or DM me or whatever assuming you're not a bootlickerhe/theyfuck the police#acab